Added to: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2018/47

Makes sense.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2018/46 <--- added. Looks OK?

I first noticed it roughly 22 hours ago.

I have tried in different browsers to make sure it's not a local caching issue.

Added to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2018/45 – makes sense?

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1c3WeqtrjROVEynTtl_iIgyj5iusblHt8 if anyone for some weird reason is very interested in the notes that were the core part of my short presentation (ignore the Swedish part to the right, that's notes for an upcoming non-Wikimedia talk).

Mailing lists emailed.

The MassMessages have been sent out.

Village Pump posts, mailing lists and users who participated last year tomorrow, I think, to give us a day to figure out any larger problems.

Tech News delivered.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2019/Invitation_list for personal invitations.

The second day is fine.

Excellent, thanks.

@Quiddity, can you handle IRC once the wishlist is open for proposals?

As of 25 October:

Written, sent to Seddon to make sure the CentralNotice part of it makes sense.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Johan_(WMF)/Creating_Wikipedia

Of course. That's part of our support. What Erica meant was that we have a structure in place – we don't have to invent a communications strategy, just build on what we have done previous years. Anyway, we have scheduled a meeting on Wednesday, we should be able to iron this out then.

Noted.

"Before this all abuse filters that prevented edits had the same error message"?

Thanks. I simplified the language a bit further for en-1 and en-2 speakers:

@ovasileva Thank you for marking this for inclusion in Tech News. Making sure I don't misunderstanding, something like this, in very simplified terms with a link to this Phab task?

@jmatazzoni Erica is unfortunately out of office for the time being. Let us talk about this when we meet on Friday.

It's basically looking how we can fit our earlier work into the widening of our scope – less "so what can we do?" and more "so these things we have concluded, how do they fit now?".

And yep, thanks for the user-notice part. I'm not writing it myself because I wouldn't really know what to write about it.

Since I never seem to find time to do this properly, at least the two main recommendations:

The only remotely potentially possible slot that week if all six of us are to be present would be Tuesday at 15:00 UTC, i.e. 8 AM Pacific Time, but only for 20 minutes.

Done. It's a bit late for @Aklapper but worst case he'll simply have to decline (or we could try to find a spot the week after).

Removing tag as I suppose it was kept from the parent task rather than because this deserves being mentioned in Tech News. Please re-add if I'm mistaken.