Em T284877#7283412, @NMW03 escreveu:

@Aklapper is there any way to merge these commits? It seems Juan isn't active

@NMW03 Sorry for not answering, I've been busy, but now answer your question you sent me in my email: Sorry for not answering it, I've been busy, but now answer your question you sent me in my email: Of course you can change the wordmark to your language, only the change is taking time because I need a developer to do the Code-Review to do so. approved the change.

@KartikMistry, @santhosh @Reedy: Reported bug is still happening. Can someone help me?

Hello @Turkmen! I made a wordmark for your wiki, I want to show it now and finally send it by gerrit thus solving this task
WORDMARK:

@Zabe Could you help me by Code-reviewing the two changes in Gerrit?

@Zabe Could you help me by Code-reviewing the two changes in Gerrit?

Since the task is abandoned and no other developer has commented, I will make the change in gerrit

@Urbanecm @Stanglavine @Tks4Fish So... the system is already prepared to revert, when will they do it?

Thanks @Stanglavine ! Agora falando em português, obrigado por abrir a tarefa para reverter a alteração do logotipo. E se quiser, pode deixar um desejo/mensagem nessa página, clicando no botão na página "Deseje feliz aniversário!" -> Wikipédia:20 anos, antes das 23h59min de 11 de julho de 2021 UTC (20h59min BRT).

Em T285091#7179788, @Bugreporter escreveu:

In T285091#7179770, @Juan90264 wrote:

Em T285091#7179757, @Aklapper escreveu:

@Juan90264: Hi, please ask general Search Console questions on-wiki instead. This task is only about Edu's request and is closed.
See also https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Google_Search_Console_access . Thanks a lot.

@Aklapper: Okay, could you tell me the talk page on the wiki that I can ask exactly what I asked you? Thanks Aklapper!

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech.

Em T285091#7179757, @Aklapper escreveu:

@Juan90264: Hi, please ask general Search Console questions on-wiki instead. This task is only about Edu's request and is closed.
See also https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Google_Search_Console_access . Thanks a lot.

Hi @Aklapper, could you tell me a Wikimedia employee or system administrator who has access to the Search Console? I try to talk to one, on the Talk page of this user who quotes me, about something related to a Search Console function.

@Aklapper Would you help me? The problem came back and already happened here: https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Esplanada/anúncios&diff=prev&oldid=61370517 ; having the page translated in pt-br

@Edu Tomara que esse wordmark já vá para o ar, esse logotipo ajuda a versão mobile e também o novo vector que necessita e tem o mesmo processo de adição (Quando adicionar o do mobile, automaticamente o novo vector usa).

@Urbanecm: All right, the important thing is that the logo works and also thanks for helping with the task. And now it's just celebrating the 20th anniversary of Wikipedia in Portuguese!

@Tks4Fish Certeza que isso não dará errado? A imagem está escrito em código-fonte do SVG.
Mesmo que dê certo ou não, obrigado Tks4Fish!

@Urbanecm: So... You were read the my message?

@Urbanecm: I just forgot to leave the links in the message, ICON: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/WP20Symbols_twenty_v2.svg/50px-WP20Symbols_twenty_v2.svg.png; WORDMARK: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/WP20_ptwiki20_logo_wikipedia.svg/119px-WP20_ptwiki20_logo_wikipedia.svg.png. I also prepared a code that requires the use of [[pt:MediaWiki:Common.css]], if you want we can use this alternative for the new vector, but I need your editing to do this.

@Urbanecm: Can you then place the version of the old vector publicly on the Lusophone website temporarily? Or if there is how, put a version of the logo already prepared for the new vector?

Thank you, @Zabe !

@Albertoleoncio: E Alberto, obrigado por ter aberto a tarefa por mim!

@MusikAnimal: Thanks for doing the task and, in my opinion, the system is working properly.

@Aklapper : I ended up discovering what caused the problem said in the argument, when I saw "Salved", I had the impression
that the translation made afterwards had already been saved. Therefore, I will not prepare the video, because the video would not help, than write as the cause of the error.

@Aklapper: I will take a screenshot in .mp4 to describe the bug. So that it becomes easier to understand.

In T261133#6419171 @Darwinius wrote:

First, there is no pillar being "violated". We are challenging not a pillar, but a "foundational" principle born and implemented at wiki.en in 2005, 4 years after wiki.pt was running as a community. Nobody there was consulted, as far as I know, before alien entities decided that the bizarrery that "anyone can edit" forcibly included IPs - which are not persons, and are not equivalent to them - was something "foundational". Not unsurprisingly, that topic has been controversial since ever at wiki.pt, with a lot of community members wanting to get rid of it, but with fear of challenging a status quo where they had no word, to start with. To me, this was clearly a colonial/imperial-like interference of the wiki.en community into other local communities, which unfortunately continues to be perpetuated.

Finally, about the mentioned "foundational principle", let's not forget the huge fallacy of talking about "freedom" when referring to using IPs to edit. IPs are a liability, both for then persons behind them, for the project and ultimately for WMF, which has the obligation/ideal of ensuring a safe environment for editing the projects. IPs can reveal who and where you are, up to the desk the computer is installed at. Just to mention a well known case from wiki.pt, less than 2 years ago a military police worker from São Paulo, Brasil, which politically edited Wikipedia using and IP from the Military Police network, was easily detected, publicly denounced and subject to disciplinary process and other charges at their workplace, for using an IP he most probably believed was "anonymous", as Wikipedia policies very wrongly call them. This liability and source of danger for Wikipedia users should have been more than enough reason to have thrown that "foundational" principle down the toilet long ago. Yet, inexplicably, there are still people defending it (never caring to explain why, but just parroting "it's the status quo", as you just did). In any case, calling this "anonymity" and "freedom to edit" is nothing but a sad joke.

In the discussion of the Lusophone community, I was in favor of banning IPs, as they are the main vandalists of Wikipedia Lusophone; but the foundation principle says that

Thank you!

@Aklapper: Well could you do this task above (the one in the order)?

@Aklapper: Sorry, I was inspired by this request [[T29728]], which contained Bawolff and Shell. More if you can do the task I asked for above. Appreciate!