@Tchanders I explored a few approaches for displaying the timer.

@AAlhazwani-WMF wrote:
Wouldn't it be better if we really make sure they save their recovery code save before asking them to add a new 2FA method?

I suggest we add the contribs link after check user link? Or add it before, whichever is higher priority as a link.

In T398662#11201432, @kostajh wrote:

@KColeman-WMF we have a pattern for this in CheckUser-SuggestedInvestigations (to expand the list of accounts), can we use the same pattern here for active wikis and list of groups?

@Niharika Do we still need this task since the hypothesis it was attached to is no longer being worked on?

Thanks @Dreamy_Jazz! I'm going to check with Growth team designers about this.

In T404979#11202676, @Dreamy_Jazz wrote:

@KColeman-WMF should the filters be collapsed by default? We can either have it open by default or collapsed by default.

Here are some screenshots of what open / collapsed looks like for reference:

In T404979#11200487, @Tchanders wrote:

@KColeman-WMF @Niharika Does the flow in T404979#11194251 look OK?

I asked about tooltip text in design review and the suggestion is to shorten it to: Can only investigate up to 10 accounts

In T388718#11132408, @STran wrote:

@KColeman-WMF The implementation of the number has changed to be an aggregate count of all temporary accounts found on all IPs associated with the temp account being looked up. As such, the original copy seems to be outdated (Temporary accounts from this IP), Would this copy be okay instead? Other temporary accounts on the IPs. Happy to change it to anything.

I would advise against opening on hover as the card contains links and a menu that we want users to be able to access, and a hover state will make navigating to these more fragile.

@Johannnes89 I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on how prominent this globally blocked/locked message needs to be? Should it be given the same prominence as "active local blocks" or should it be even more prominent (as it is in design options B and C)?

Design update:

In T401128#11101636, @mszwarc wrote:

This is how I imagine this feature:

@KColeman-WMF what do you think about this design?

Thanks, this looks good to me!