Fri, Aug 5
Thu, Aug 4
Thanks @Amire80 for working on this! The Growth team hopes to work on a copy edit structured task eventually, so it's important that we use consistent language.
Wed, Aug 3
Growth Ambassador completed an initial Quality of Add a link suggestions review and we found that the majority of article suggestions that were prioritized were better. About 70% of suggestions the were Prioritized were better than the unprioritized (Normal) article suggestions. To be clear this was a manual review, so there is some subjectivity and the results are likely not statistically significant.
Ok, thanks! I've created the associated engineering task: T314518 .
Tue, Aug 2
Thanks for the info, @Tgr . I'll talk with design about this. It sounds like this might be a fair amount of work and user testing showed this "call to action" wasn't a very clear to many people, so I want to reconsider this task.
Mon, Aug 1
Do we need to tune the service parameters for underlinked tasks so instead of trying to link the first few linkable words it finds, it suggests some of the most relevant links?
I'm marking this Epic as resolved since all subtasks are complete and I don't believe the Growth team has any further work planned that is associated with this Epic.
Having multiple info icons within the same module is a little confusing, so I agree this could be a solution:
remove (i), add a cog icon with an option to quit mentorship
Wed, Jul 27
Thanks for reporting this @Iniquity and for adding detailed example screenshots!
Tue, Jul 26
Mon, Jul 25
Perfect, thank you both!
Fri, Jul 22
Thu, Jul 21
I'm fine with: "Changes to this setting won't take effect immediately.", with a link to an FAQ for further details. But I think we should add to the FAQ to make the explanation clearer.
It’s very nice to meet you too, @Novem_Linguae .
Wed, Jul 20
@EdErhart-WMF - I'll mark this as resolved, but feel free to reopen this task if any further data or analysis is needed related to this campaign.
I know some level of accessibility testing is part of the QA workflow, so I'll let @Etonkovidova answer if she thinks an a task is needed.
Tue, Jul 19
Removing T222310 as parent tasks since it was decided that client rendering will make this task too complex to include it as an extensibility goal for the new impact module / positive reinforcement work.
Mon, Jul 18
Declining this task, as this will be completed as part of the New Impact Module work (T222310) and doesn't require a separate task.
I'm closing this task, but this edge case is covered within this task: T313274