@Legaulph
Sorry for the delay, I cannot insert new features in the next version. I have to stabilize the precedent features. But I can insert new features in 2020 (when I have a little time).

@Anomie
I found the problem in my last code.

@Anomie can you help me ?

I replace "cookie.txt" by "/tmp/cookie.txt" and it works now. I will update the doc on Mediawiki.

@tstarling
It was for a feature improvement proposal because I needed it for another extension. Unfortunately, I am too busy. I do not know when I will need to change this extension again and so when I can implement the @Reedy's requirements and search why I inserted sometimes comments in this code... Sorry :/

Sorry for these 3 files, I'm tired ;)
It's done.

I will merge before october... at the next update.

Sorry... I cleaned. It's ok now.

After a checkout to 1.33 of Mediawiki
I have also a problem with vendor/wikimedia/less.php/lib/Less/Tree/Mixin/Call.php

Great ;)
Bye

In T227845#5327494, @Truegeex wrote:

Sadly I get the same error with your workaround: "Undefined index: desc".

@Truegeex You can use this quick fix with BOUND and BIND for the moment :

I think it's solved. I do not see the error anymore.

New patch :
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/mediawiki/extensions/Push/+/481527/

For example, a SPARQL service of one university:
https://io.datascience-paris-saclay.fr/sparql
Another example, a SPARQL service of a laboratory:
https://sparql.lri.fr/sparql

@MarcoAurelio It's ok for me.

@MarcoAurelio Thanks, it works.

I have a problem with gerrit

Ok, you have a doc/tutorial/good example ?

Remarks : for the moment, the installation is too complex (with endpoints in the file extension). Another solution need to be imagined.

In theory... with wfLoadExtension( 'LinkedWiki' )... you can use composer and yarn at the root of wiki to install/update all dependencies of extensions and skins of Mediawiki...

@hashar
You can re-try. Bye

My point of view on licences about data was personal, I didn't work for Wikidata and I didn't do massive data import... I am only an user.

OK I will merge alias

I will remove NC... I hope you know what you are doing.

@Legoktm CC BY-SA 4.0 is ok ?

For me, CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 is better. I developped since 2010 this extension almost alone and I dont undestand why I will give this time for nothing to private companies.

9 or 8 years ago, I choosed CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 because it was the same license of Wikipedia, 9 years ago. I don't understand the problem after 9 years.