@Revent agreed. I'm taking the liberty of subscribing you to T167815: Conduct MP3 patrol discussion, you'll find the discussion there to be relevant.

From what I understand, hiring is being finalized for a Multimedia CL as the team is being put together to start the Structured Data project.

The (start) list of pages is here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_Guidance/Index

The assembled document doesn't seem to actually need this assessment in its current form. I don't see the usefulness in completing this task as it is. The third column might be revived as "uses" or something like that.

@Quiddity I think this is something we can achieve together, between me organizing the page to match a new workflow with your help in creating a template/advanced styling of the help page. We'll talk soon when you wrap up some other projects.

In T163540#3252608, @Whatamidoing-WMF wrote:

Any suggestions on a page name at mw.org?

Initial index is assembled and living here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_Guidance/Index

In T115853#3110324, @Qgil wrote:

I recommend to focus on teams here. Project templates is a different topic, there are a couple being used and then there is the one we started prototyping last year (in relation to a TCG task that I cannot find).

Initial ORES review is up and running, so closing. Will continue to document ORES/TCG work in that space.

The TCG needs further review between product and TC. These discussions are to be arranged by TC and product leads, they are out of my control.

This will be happening with ORES this quarter.

March meeting done, scheduling April as we speak. Closing this task as completed.

In T160684#3121958, @Qgil wrote:

How to edit a wiki page or how to use a Talk page look like too basic instructions for this scope, right? Community Liaisons edit wiki pages and use discussion pages, but these are not skills specific to CLs.

I would like to thank all participants in this and related tasks here on Phabricator for their communication and handling of what was and is a delicate and sometimes tense matter on the wikis. I truly appreciate it from everyone.

One preliminary, introduction meeting was held in February. In March, we aim to start discussing a concrete issue.

Finished re-drafting as a whole. The document lives on a wiki, so it's living and can still be edited as needed.

Spot on, thank you.

In T141703#2877174, @MarcoAurelio wrote:

In T141703#2877151, @Aklapper wrote:

Are these open SUL-Finalization tasks automatically also tasks that require work in the MediaWiki-extensions-CentralAuth codebase?

@Keegan does not seem to be working on SUL-F anymore (?).

In T125815#2604394, @Qgil wrote:

What about scanning the content of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/Communities, move anything interesting to the Technical Collaboration Guideline and then set a redirect from that page to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_Guideline ?

Revisiting it with fresh eyes, and it's fine. I wasn't worried about nothing.

In T138436#2925885, @Qgil wrote:

Is this task stalled or supposed to move to Community-Liaisons (Jan-Mar 2017)

This review and re-drafting should be completed by the first half of this quarter (Q3FY16/17, so second week of February, or about five weeks from now), following discussions that are to be had at the 2017 MediaWiki Developer summit and any additional last minute feedback on the talk page.