@santhosh Thank you for your detailed response. The example you mentioned, "Supporting digitization of old books that require special fonts for better reproduction," is directly relevant to ws-export in Bengali Wikisource (T344532). Including the Kalpurush font would significantly enhance the accurate digital representation of Bengali texts. By "official," I did not mean government-recognized but rather that Kalpurush is widely used across Bengali publications, print media, and offices. As a typeface designer, you may already be aware that Bengali Wikipedia and its sister projects use Kalpurush in their logos and wordmarks, further highlighting its significance in Bengali content. Additionally, its small file size would have minimal impact on loading times. Therefore, I kindly request that Kalpurush be included at least as an option in the ULS's font list.

@DreamRimmer, I'm not entirely sure about the appropriateness of this "under discussion" flag/tag—whether it's right or wrong. While @Yahya initiated a WP:CONSENSUS discussion here, neither he nor anyone else has provided comments on-wiki, specifically on the Noticeboard. However, I did comment in this discussion, and no one opposed my input.

In T382822#10425069, @Yahya wrote:

You sought community input, some members opposed certain aliases, and now you've concluded that community consensus isn't required? Does this mean you intended to bypass community agreement? I supported option two, which clearly indicates that I do not support the other options, and the same holds true for others. Regardless of what is stated elsewhere, no feature or configuration change should be implemented without community agreement.

In T382822#10424998, @Yahya wrote:

There clearly isn't consensus on all the aliases listed here. So, what is the justification for requesting all of them?

Sorry for using wrong form

We initially requested the Kalpurush font for ws-export (as part of a WikiConference Hackathon project) because, unlike many other free Bengali fonts, it has a suitable license. As a widely used, recognized Unicode font favored by the FOSS community for Bengali books and periodicals, its absence from ws-export is a key omission.

see: User:R1F4T/AFCRH.js

Thanks to @Ishtiak_Abdullah and @SHEKH and translation from the list is completed. without the Adiutor page, as it is not marked for translation.

commons:Help:Gadget-GallerySlideshow
commons:Commons:Abuse filter
commons:Help:Gadget-ACDC
commons:Help:Gadget-ExtraTabs2
commons:Help:Gadget-UserMessages
commons:Commons:AutoWikiBrowser
commons:Help:VisualFileChange.js
commons:Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot
commons:Help:Commons Commander
commons:Commons:Flickypedia
commons:Commons:Adiutor
commons:Commons:Gadgets

In T379610#10328781, @Peachey88 wrote:

Apologies for the delay, Bangla-WikiConference-Hackathon-2024 has now been created.

Github Repo: potasiyam/Kalpurush

as a part of Bangla WikiConference Hackathon 2024

I apologize for raising the issue in Phabricator lately. Due to some misunderstandings among us, the task opening in Phabricator got delayed. I hope this won't be a problem and that the project workboard will be opened by the 13th Nov, as we intended to start working on the 14th.

License files should also be included when proposing one or more fonts.