https://guc.toolforge.org/?src=rc&by=date&user=ListeriaBot

Here is another example of a false positive: <math>\partial</math> in the article https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/D

Thanks for the answer. I assume that "it found" should be read as "IAB found".
What I don't understand is how "somewhere on some wiki" should be read or interpreted.
Why should "somewhere on some wiki" have an influence on a specific reference, including a specific access date, in a specific article in a specific wiki?
We do not want IAB to replace a reference to a site with a random snapshot that is "a guaranteed working snapshot with *similar* data". We want a snapshot that is likely to contain the *same data* as was present at "the specified access date". In this particular case I am told that there is a significant difference between the contents from December 2018 and from June 2019.

This sounds similar to phab:T216318

Ta bort blanktecknet efter "=" så får du fler "hits".

Here is a smaller example showing the lines in the wrong order:

@Cirdan Please have a look at the link I provided and also previous edits made by IABot in the same article.

This is a slightly modified post from the project chat on March 18, 2018, see
Wikidata:Project_chat#interface_for_data_entering_is_confusing_for_time_value_with_century_precision

Here are my 2 cents to this:
This morning I noticed that there were between 8,400 and 8,500 pages in the Pages with script errors category on svwp. I made "null-edit" to all of them bringing the category size down to below 20 pages. But the category keeps being filled again at a slow but steady pace. Right now there is more than 130 pages.
Most of the pages do neither show the category in the footer nor display the fat red Lua error message in the text, but still they are put in the category.

Thanks for the prompt response with explanation on what was ongoing. The cluster s2 now seems to be fully updated.

URL to diff: