Dec 6 2017
I tested it and it works. Thanks a lot, that was really quick!
Dec 2 2017
Nov 26 2016
@Tgr, I would argue it's a self-deceit. The current grant list page is too complicated. If it was a simple "allow read-only access only" setting - then maybe your argument would be valid.
Instead the current grant list page is hard to use (a user is supposed to hover every checkbox to figure out what it does and decide if they need it) and confusing (it lists even the rights that are not actually available to the user). I'm pretty sure almost no one will use it as intended. Instead, most of the users are going to check every checkbox on that page and forget about it. And nothing can be done about it. So adding the 'grant all existing rights' checkbox is not going to change anything security-wise.
Nov 23 2016
@Tgr, could you please elaborate on what you mean by "unhealthy habits"?
Nov 11 2016
Nov 8 2016
@Anomie thank you very much for the clarification!
@Anomie So, essentially every extension that uses custom rights is broken for bots now. I kinda have a feeling this should've been addressed somehow before deploying action = login deprecation.
Aug 14 2016
Aug 30 2015
I would advocate for the removal of the workaround from T2295, it would make everything cleaner.
Dec 22 2014
Dec 14 2014
In my point of view, it would've been better to use something like L<nowiki>'</nowiki>''homme'' est (or L'<nowiki></nowiki>''homme'' est) than to implement all that half-broken hackery from T2295