Wikimédia France member, working on GLAM partnerships and tools to track impact of actions.
User Details
- User Since
- Nov 24 2014, 10:51 AM (585 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Léna [ Global Accounts ]
Jul 24 2024
The one that prompted the issue is https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucie_Castets ( you can see that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucie_Castets and other languages exists)
Apr 5 2020
Correction : removing the spaces in the template solved the problem
Jan 16 2020
May 19 2019
Irrelevant since we use pattypan for the first generation of CSV
May 18 2019
OpenRefine + Pattypa is enough
May 17 2019
Irrelevant
Requirements:
- should be readable (nice website on toollab, not a wiki page)
- should be easily translatable
- should be easily updatable (use of markdown)
- should be updatable rapidly (github repo with a trigger to update automatically
Since OpenRefine already generates the QID of the items generated we don't need to do dev work, "only" to create a very user-friendly help page that details every step for GLAM institutions and Wikimedia photographers.
Resolved by OpenRefine
This is already done by OpenRefine
May 19 2018
May 18 2018
Mar 3 2018
May 19 2017
Top down : manually translate general categories, add statements to each subcategory
Jan 16 2017
Dec 13 2016
Jul 12 2016
@Pyb Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu l'as enlevé de WikiCon alors que c'est pour faire un poster comme on en avait discuté ? Ou tu préfères que le tag soit juste pour l'organisation et pas les contenus ?
Jul 2 2016
Jul 1 2016
Jun 7 2016
Apr 1 2016
When are you planning to have this discussion ?
May 25 2015
Won't be able to present this afternoon, leaving at 3PM :(
Apr 13 2015
Example of a result expected for such an extension : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paintings_by_Vincent_van_Gogh_in_the_Kr%C3%B6ller-M%C3%BCller_Museum
Feb 21 2015
Great news, it works \o/
Feb 20 2015
Will try tonight (in 10 hours) or Monday evening, really busy week and week-end :(
Feb 18 2015
Gilles it's really ok that this bug will not be corrected any time soon. (Well no it's not but it's not your fault :) I understand the burden of understaffing and the painful logical consequence of having to only work on very critical bugs). My main issue was with the lack of communication, I don't know how it can be done. Maybe an automatic email sent when a task has its priority set to normal saying to not expect a correction before a looooong time ?
Hi everyone.
