In T226479#5281941, @matej_suchanek wrote:

Note there is also T189321 and a Patch-For-Review https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/pywikibot/core/+/461372.

In T226479#5281941, @matej_suchanek wrote:

Note there is [...] a Patch-For-Review https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/pywikibot/core/+/461372.

It's probably worth having another look at the suggested implementation (and related comments) with the way we now know WikibaseLexeme and WikibaseMediaInfo work to ensure its compatible/extensible.

In T186200#4559300, @Pintoch wrote:

Also, I think it would be very hard to clean up this implementation while maintaining compatibility with existing user code. Given that pywikibot has basically no releases and people are encouraged to use the master branch, I don't see how a breaking change like this could be carried out without creating a big mess. So in short, I don't see how that can be done at all in pywikibot's git repository. But I would be very happy to be proven wrong.

As a first question. How does pywikibot deal with files with structured data today? Does it ignore it (loading remaining info correctly), does it drop it (meaning it gets deleted on re-save) or does it crash?

Shifting as this is caused by the migration

Note that both donera.wikimedia.se and wlm.wikimedia.se might also be used for other things (e.g. databases)

There are a few more subdomains pointing to the old website over at https://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Lista_%C3%B6ver_dom%C3%A4ner which are likely broken.

Do we have a related task about inventorying which laptops are being released to the hardware exchange program?

Thanks. Which of the Glesys machines was it on?

Once implemented a blurb should be added to https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Uploadtext pointing regular users to Commons.

Svensk länk: https://www.dustin.se/product/5011129602/ideapad-s530

Note on #9:

En budget ska upprättas över framtida planerade ekonomiska händelser. [...] Budgeten ska upprättas för det kommande verksamhetsåret. Man kan också redovisa det senaste årets utfall som jämförelse mot budgeterad period. [...]

So what we send in is the budget for 2020, we can include 2018 as a comparison.

• Payson

With T225483 this part of the task can be removed

@Jopparn Do we have a particular time in mind for when we want to send this in? Is there a particular board meeting before which it would be good to have everything ready for signatures

The new pdf is at https://www.insamlingskontroll.se/sites/default/files/Anvisningar%20f%C3%B6r%20ans%C3%B6kan%20om%2090-konto%2018-10.pdf

Lets schedule a meeting for after Wikimania (and recuperation period) to go through the guidelines again. Both to incorporate any feedback but also with an eye to any parts which we have in practice chosen to ignore or de facto standards which have yet to be written down.

This is scheduled for July

Inventory these in June but any work should happen later

@Xqt Thanks for catching and fixing these.

In T225417#5246769, @Dvorapa wrote:

In T225417#5246700, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

In T225417, @Xqt wrote:

• mo.wikitionary.org is redirected to ro.wiktionary.org

This doesn't seem to be true. At least my browser gets a server not found... On the other hand ro.wiktionary.org also doesn't exist.

My browser also gets server not found for wikitionary.org :D just a typo

I just encountered the same on Commons when trying to save translations to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_Sverige

• tastydata is PY2 and related to a live service (https://wikimedia-sverige.github.io/tastydata/), the python part of the code is not in use today.
• ÖDOK is PY2 and related to a live service (http://offentligkonst.se), the python part of the code is still in use.

@Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE @Sebastian_Berlin-WMSE
In addition to repos in our three github accounts, and WMSE's account there are likely some gists which we still make regular (at least yearly) use of. We should probably consider moving those to the scripts repo.

In T225417, @Xqt wrote:

• mo.wikitionary.org is redirected to ro.wiktionary.org

This doesn't seem to be true. At least my browser gets a server not found

In T198676#4857414, @ArielGlenn wrote:

Piiiinggg... what is needed on this?

Files sent to @AxelPettersson_WMSE

If there has been no update on this it might be worth calling Bahnhof to check what is going on.

@Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE did you ever get to the bottom of this?

Didn't https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/320649 fix this?

Might be able to re-use some of the piping in T222244: Allow logging to tool SALs from Toolforge shell

Pattern was created a while a go and is in use in the template available through GSuite

In T224955#5233625, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

• Google+ deprecation: It should be enough for us to check that we have no mentions of our G+ profile anywhere and that the old one isn't tied to our GSuite account/G+ isn't activated. support article

Nothing in use

Actually handled through T220181: Sort out Google+ accounts

In T220181#5246426, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

We should however go through the references to Google+ on our wiki and delete any non-historic mentions.

Neither of these are connected to our GSuite account so neither survived the closing down of G+.

In T200418, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

We might have to update our Swish number in Zynatic since its currently entered with spaces to be easily readable on e.g. invoices. If so we might follow up with a request to Zynatic that the numbers be displayed with spaces (as per how Swish does it).

Not necessary. The current implementation distinguishes between the integrated Swish number (the new one) and the one displayed on invoices (the old/public one).

Ones this is up and running we need to revise our Invoice message to mention that Swish and PayPal are both available if you log in.

Is this the last bit of this task to be handled? Might be worth breaking it out as a separate task with a check-list to see which of the existing messages need updating.

The end result looks like we now have two numbers (one for donations and one for integration with Zynatic)? We should probably make a note about the second number on https://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Sverige. Not so that people use it but as a way of re-assuring anyone who spots that the number is different. A footnote should be enough.