Tried another more narrow contact approach

Currently blocked by T252388: Upgrade demo wiki OS, since communicating is a lot easier if there is a live demo site

Issue around attachments has been resolved. awaiting final signing of attachments before being returned

Still waiting for an answer

In T253504#6188895, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6187729, @Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE wrote:

In T253504#6168448, @Eric_Luth_WMSE wrote:

Number of underrepresented users editing. Per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7u3623U2gtmXYVUJBuHKdXg_GJWBhHbT5ayxOeN3RY/edit#gid=1413988015

I don't think there's a way of getting a reliable indication here, since users don't have to self-identify?

I've gone through and (very stereotypically) counted the among of editors with traditionally male names, traditionally female names, and names we don't know. That is, as I've understood, how it has been done previously. Not an optimal way..

@Jenny_Brandt_WMSE Could you take a look at the issue with the three documents missing from the diarium?

In T246086#6188305, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

I'll open up the linked document, add a contact us link and also link in the WMDE site visit report

I'll open up the linked document, add a contact us link and also link in the WMDE site visit report

@Pppery and @kostajh thanks for the update =)

In T199414#6175964, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

Worth considering is if we should also rename the WikispeechServerUrl variable to WikispeechSpeechoidUrl

Too late

In T253720#6171723, @Jenny_Brandt_WMSE wrote:

The two new board members have been informed that they will have to write a short summary. I think the idea was that they could write on their own wiki, and we could link that to the webpage on wikimedia.se (where to board is introduced).

In T252125#6175708, @AxelPettersson_WMSE wrote:

Training done, but one board member called in sick.

In T253721#6171682, @AxelPettersson_WMSE wrote:

Check list item was added May 19: https://se.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Checklista_f%C3%B6r_%C3%A5rsm%C3%B6te&diff=prev&oldid=85435&diffmode=source, added for this year also now: https://se.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%85rsm%C3%B6te_2020/Checklista_f%C3%B6r_digitalt_%C3%A5rsm%C3%B6te&type=revision&diff=85536&oldid=85524&diffmode=source

@Sebastian: Would it make sense to move the current text under the Documentation mw:Extension:Wikispeech#Complete_list_of_configuration_options into the description parameters of the extension.json?

mw:Extension:Wikispeech and mw:Extension:Wikispeech/Speechoid on wmflabs updated.

Worth considering is if we should also rename the WikispeechServerUrl variable to WikispeechSpeechoidUrl

@HannaLindgren mentione that this has been done on the STTS side. Wikispeech-WMSE still has to do it on their side (mw:Extension:Wikispeech and sub-pages)

Waiting on T248162: Use revision and segment ID as input for synthesizing speech

Also consider sticking the script in it's own repo (if it's likely re-usable by other actors).

There are some issues about unittests needing to be re-written/re-structured. That might be broken out as a Technical-Debt task

Is this possibly blocked by T248162: Use revision and segment ID as input for synthesizing speech

We are going with Speechoid. Left to do is to go through documentation and eliminate any TTS-server after which this task can be resolved

In T253720#6171634, @AxelPettersson_WMSE wrote:

I think this is doable. Is there an example from Giva what is required?

@Jenny_Brandt_WMSE Maybe you know?

Can they add a link to a CV on their personal web page or something like LinkedIn?

I think it would be better to have any relevant info on the page so as to not require any members to have to go to a third party site to find info about their Board. By having it on the user page we can also slim the information down to only what is relevant for our context. I'm thinking we don't need more than what e.g. WMF board has.

@Jopparn @AxelPettersson_WMSE You two have dealt with the onboarding in the past, do you think the above suggested solutions is doable? Especially when it comes to the board members without a wiki-background.

Is there an update on the state of this?

Ranking of municipality (or County might work better) of percentage of illsutrated objects (to get a feel for if any länsstyrelse are worth targeting for 2021)