If they have not been reverted, I think, they are very likely good edits. Some bad ones might not have been reverted but I don't think they would be too many. Having said that, I don't think it would be a problem if they are included in the review. The eswiki dataset was around 8000 (if I recall) so I think 7000 it is manageable. I will defer to your expertise, whatever you think is better from the technical point of view.

Sorry for the delay. I have been somewhat disconnected these days. I just got admin rights in eswikiversity so marking the edits of the admin group members as trusted should address my concern. Let me know if you need any additional information.

I just found the questions in Github. I think most of your concerns might be because eswikiversity is a very small project. I am the only regular contributor there for some periods of time. My background is in software development, so if you let me know how I can see the data and what are your questions, I think should be able to answer them.

Thank you very much to everyone!

@Ladsgroup Sorry to comment on a closed task but the ORES filters are not yet active in the eswikiquote recent changes page. Do we need to open a separated task for that purpose?

es-r3 is complete.

I can help over the weekend. I emailed @bmansurov as requested.

The translation for "Edit quality (20k sample)" is "Editar calidad (20k muestra aleatoria)"

Sorry! You are right. Thank you a lot for checking! It is really appreciated.

Thank you very much! Just one question. Do you know why it doesn't work on user space?

This should be complete now. There are 60 labels pending but the last 2 worksets I pulled were all edits on deleted pages and the one before them had only 1 live edit.

This should be complete now. There are 40 labels left that belong to deleted pages.

@Harjotsingh Thank you very much for the fixes and enhancements you did as part of this project.

@Trizek-WMF I noticed there are a couple of calls for help with the translations in the Announcement. Is this available somewhere in Meta to translate? It is a lot easier to do the translation there and then replace the raw code of the translated page than trying to translate the message with all the code and formatting tags that was posted to the VPs.

Got it. Thank you very much!

Ok, so this change will modify the default behavior for the whole wiki. No changes needed to the individual quizzes. And if a community wants to revert to the old behavior, they can add a code like this to their Common.css.

This is also happening in the Spanish projects (eswiki, eswikiversity, etc.)

I am little confused on how this is supposed to work from the quiz writer perspective. Right now, if I don't want a quiz to have feedback, I do not incorporate it in the source code. If the quiz has feedback in the source code, it is shown for all questions that have it regardless of whether the user passed or failed the question.

Would it be possible to set up something like the table classes ?

If you allow me to make a comment, audio files can be embedded inside a quiz as you can see here.

Wow, that was quick. Thank you very much!

I can see this in the non-WP wikis but the name shows as "special-characters-group-greekextended", even in the English wikis.

@Tgr: Thanks! Richdec also confirmed that he is able to access the site now.

For reference, this conversation was also opened in the VP at eswiki.

Hi! Will this also fix the other portals? Or are they still pointing to Meta?

Well, that is not what Chris Koerner said in the portal improvements page in meta and they seem to be in gerrit. Is there any way to find out for sure?

The stats in the other portals have not been updated since the move either. They must be updated as well.