This looks great now. I think we can close the ticket now?
Tue, Apr 23
One option: instead of appending it to the data type name we could add a line after the description of each datatype saying "The value type for this data type is foo." And rephrase the top message to say something like "This is a list of all data types and their value types available on this installation:" and then link value type to some documentation page if we have it?
T94019 might be relevant for getting things more in sync.
Perfect. Thank you very much!
Closing this one now and I'll open subtasks for the remaining improvements that were not part of this task.
Mon, Apr 22
Sun, Apr 21
Moving back to todo until http://wikiba.se/ontology# is updated.
❤ for test link
@Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE Can you verify and close this one?
I think we need to make this a bit easier to understand still. Currently if you don't know what you are looking at already you likely won't understand it.
Should be live near the end of the month if I read the tag right.
Ok so we add abq.
Let's quickly check in on the shortened version of the edit summary.
Ok let's move ahead with this.
Thanks all for figuring out a way forward.
@WMDE-leszek can you help?
Let's do it.
Let's move ahead with this. There is clear demonstrated need we want to support.
Anyone up for giving 1-byte's patch a +2?
*poke* about @Esc3300 comment. Let's get this resolved one way or the other.
Yeah given everything we know about re-use I don't think syncing between the different dump formats is more important than freshness - especially given that they are never really going to be in sync anyway.
I think we can remove some more stuff though or make it clearer. Let's sit together and look at it in-person.
Is anything missing before we can create those separate dumps? Any decisions we still need to take?
Fri, Apr 19
Any chance this is related to T221368?
Yeah I am not sure what's happening. So I'd say let's stop the bot until either @Edoderoo or someone from the dev team can look into it.