Fri, Feb 17
Thu, Feb 16
Wed, Feb 15
Tue, Feb 14
Mon, Feb 13
@JAufrecht I think it's all fine, nice work.
Wed, Feb 8
Tue, Feb 7
I admit that 2 may have been a little on the high side /cc @MBinder_WMF.
Thu, Feb 2
Olga may break this into subtasks for each eng.
No estimate, just tracked in the sprint so the team is aware of Olga and Anthony's work.
Wed, Feb 1
Draft is out and awaiting TPG input.
Tue, Jan 31
@JAufrecht is this related the Phab scenarios/engagement experiment we've mocked, or does it track something else?
Mocks are done; Joel did images, I did phab-01 "live" testing.
Fri, Jan 27
Joel and I have concluded that the solution is likely 1 of 3 scenarios, which we are separately mocking up in different systems to see if we are on the same page. Once we have mocked we will present to TPG.
Thu, Jan 26
Joel and I have started collating various proposals for how to integrate Phab with the new workstream ideas.
Wed, Jan 25
Tue, Jan 24
Acknowledge @ksmith's concern with "Light" (that it is potentially confusing with what we used to call "Light Engagements") but OK with what we have right now.
Mon, Jan 23
OK, thanks for clarifying.
Sorry, @ovasileva I still see this task as purple "Needs Triage." Perhaps you prioritized it in a column somewhere? What I meant was "High" or "Normal" etc. :)
@ovasileva Now that this has an estimate, can it be prioritized or declined? Word has it you wanted an estimate first... :)