Migrating to PHP 8.5 has become a high priority for the MW Releases Working Group. Please. let us know if it make sense to tag Release-Engineering-Team in this task or if it should go on a different route.

If this is visual diff specific, we are moving to tracking for now and not prioritising. Please, let us know if there's a material bug on wiki to look for.

Hey @Hadoku.me thanks for the enthusiasm and proactivity.

I'm declining this task since it's not our intention to support this as a new feature. Happy to discuss it further if needed.

In T411834#11561465, @Amire80 wrote:

It has been proposed that we allow users to deploy Lua code which is stored in Git to multiple wikis.

Proposed by whom?

@Amire80 you can find more about the rationale behind in this post.

Have any on-wiki module developers been consulted about this?

User research is ongoing and this project is being considered an experiment to assess feasibility.

It's already possible to put Lua code in Git and to call it from all the wikis. See T209310, for example.

It's actually done very rarely, however, which shows that adding Git to the process is way too complicated for most people.

I didn't understand how similar is the linked task to the scope of the work here. But the intention is not to just allow "Git" to be the source repository, but encourage an ecosystem that will improve the developer experience and expand it to gadgets, user scripts, etc in the future if the experiment is successful.

In T414852#11560291, @Jdlrobson-WMF wrote:

@MSantos I looked into next steps here.

1. We need to request a privacy statement for legal (info)
2. We reach out to design research to get a Qualtrics survey setup.
3. We would source translations for the languages we want to run this one.
4. We'd need to work out who to show it to.

#3 is likely to be the trickiest for an external survey so I've been rethinking this as an internal survey to make sourcing translations easier. Please see associated patch and example survey here:
https://228f09fcdd.catalyst.wmcloud.org/wiki/New_York_(magazine)
Alternatively we can setup an external survey and limit the audience to certain languages that we are easily able to get translations for.

If this looks like it will be useful let me know so I can kick off the process to request the privacy statement (which should take a week or 2 from what I understand).

In T414852#11560291, @Jdlrobson-WMF wrote:

@MSantos I looked into next steps here.

1. We need to request a privacy statement for legal (info)
2. We reach out to design research to get a Qualtrics survey setup.
3. We would source translations for the languages we want to run this one.
4. We'd need to work out who to show it to.

#3 is likely to be the trickiest for an external survey so I've been rethinking this as an internal survey to make sourcing translations easier. Please see associated patch and example survey here:
https://228f09fcdd.catalyst.wmcloud.org/wiki/New_York_(magazine)
Alternatively we can setup an external survey and limit the audience to certain languages that we are easily able to get translations for.

If this looks like it will be useful let me know so I can kick off the process to request the privacy statement (which should take a week or 2 from what I understand).

@Taylor I apologise for the late response.

Here are 4 questions that came to my mind, but might be too extensive for a quick survey. Let me know what you think.