I want to join those who claim that the problem with IPv6 reverts is persisting. And I honestly do not understand why this thing should not be attacked broadly. IPv6 reverts are an example for the fact that ~250 characters are sometimes too little space, not the one oddity to an otherwise perfect limit, when Latin script languages is the point of reference.

seems fine from the inside ;) thanks a lot

to be honest, without reading through the task you mentioned, I have no clue in how far risk management could plays a role in this detail of our wiki, but the reason for this request is simple: it is strange and a little confusing to see another logo on the log-in page as compared to all the other pages of the wiki.

It is a bug in the MediaWiki export feature.

"powerful": Can work work with a lot of data and digest them according to the user's need. Can search for results live in the wikis, not in a dump.

"Templatetiger" is the name of an online tool:

• https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatetiger/
• https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Technik/Labs/Tools/templatetiger

I think that the wish to have a tool which gives you an analysis of the usage of a category is really easy to be understood.

As there exist wikis beside en.WP: On de.WP the option to allow blocked users to edit "Wikipedia:Sperrprüfung" (appealing a block) would be appreciated. At least by some.

sorry, forgot to mention that: The core of the discussion is at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:Sperrpr%C3%BCfung, but our new procedure caused disturbances and discussions in several places.

it'd already be an improvement if it were made possible to track "article-linked" relating to one's watchlist "as is". A separately definable list of articles to be echoed would be a huge bonus, of course.

in case a name requires to be proposed, "infraprotect" might be an option.