In T245442#5892096, @Seppl2013 wrote:

I do not have the error message that was shown to me when i tried to delete the child but there was one which did not explain why the remove was not possible it simply said something like "failed". Unfortunately i did not make a screenshot.

In T245442#5892071, @Seppl2013 wrote:

• it should not be possible to add two entries https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P40 for the same child

The way Wikidata works, it should be possible. It can lead to a constraint violation, but Wikidata/Wikibase itself almost constraints nothing (only constraint is datatype constraints). If you want to prevent a duplicate entry for a property with a unique value constraint you should make a gadget for that.

Can you check if they work now?

Just checked Edge and I can see the checkboxes.
Firefox also shows checkboxes, even in a private tab
My chrome does have issues. And I see what the issue is.

Yes, if you want to use mfa for labels and descriptions, then you will need to create a new ticket for that as it has nothing to do with monolingual language codes.

That's because the request wasn't to make the language available for labels, but monolingual properties. That are 2 different things.

In T235468#5842286, @Misharim wrote:

Hi,
Sorry for a silly question, but has this been deployed yet? The language doesn't seem to be showing up.
Best Regards
Mishari

I submitted https://github.com/addwiki/wikibase-api/pull/57 to remove the clear parameter from addwiki/wikibase-api/src/Api/Service/RevisionSaver.php as it isn't needed to remove a statement.

For the addwiki part talk to @Addshore he's the maintainer of the addwiki code

Found the culprit in vendor/addwiki/wikibase-api/src/Api/Service/RevisionSaver.php :

In T243158#5819801, @Ladsgroup wrote:

Okay I found out what's wrong, it's the "clear" option. It messes with perception of ChangeOpResult, because it think it added everything again. This is causing all sorts of problem like edit summaries like this: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q81715970&diff=prev&oldid=1096133130 The API request with "clear" true errors out but works just fine if you remove the clear option.

I'm using the Addwiki library to save a new revision. The data that is sent to the API can be found in P10226 (was a lot of information, so a paste would be better than dumping it in here. (As serialized by the Addwiki library)

In T239411#5815588, @Skimel wrote:

Hello, thanks for closing this task, but unfortunately I cannot add wallisian as a language on Wikidata properties (such as Q45025080 "native label"). Can you fix this ? thank you :)

Something else was wrong, scripts now work again while the CSP message still shows in the browser console.

Have been able to reproduce it (or better my bot):
18-12 00:00 UTC / 19-12 00:00 UTC / 21-12 12:00 UTC / 23-12 00:00 UTC / 26-12 12:00 UTC / 27-12 12:00 UTC / 28-12 00:00 UTC / 28-12 12:00 UTC / 31-12 12:00 UTC / 01-01 12:00 UTC / 02-01 00:00 UTC
So it seems there is some datapolution on 1 or a few database servers that provide the triples for the Wikidata Query Service. And it doesn't look like it will be solved automatically.

@jhsoby What is the opinion of the LangCom? I see an IETF and an Ethnologue code in the item about the language.

@AyushBasral Why did you close this ticket? The code doesn't work and I don't see a final LangCom decision.

Also reproduced December 18th and December 19th 12AM UTC.

Indeed it works fine: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q4115189&oldid=1073803719
But when entering this, I didn't get an option, but that's a separate bug. The original request has been implemented.

@Bouzinac Why did you reopen this task which has been merged 2 years ago?

In T240316#5728908, @Douglasfugazi wrote:

Fixed. QuickStatements is working now :) Thanks a lot!

Code isn't live yet and there is a little change needed before it can go live

@jhsoby What's the opinion of langcom?

Also take in account SDOC, so set basic SDOC data

Not sure what the idea behind this task is. So for now it's stalled.

@jhsoby @Lydia_Pintscher Do we need separate entries for Siddham script or should they just use the codes sa and pi ?

@jhsoby I see an ISO-639-3 code, IETF code and an Ethnologue entry. Is that sufficient or is more needed for LangCom approval?

@Misharim Please provide a correct Wikidata link, this one isn't about a language, but an alphabet.

@jhsoby What is the opinion of the LangCom on this one?

@GerardM Now it's clear for everybody why you're objecting. That's not because you're against the language to be used for monolingual, but you want it to be used in a more broad sense. If you would have explained that earlier (instead of your vague statement) there would be no discussion and plans to move forward. So next time, just explain that you've proposed to have the language used for labels etc. that makes the discussion more clear for others.

@GerardM @jhsoby What's the opinion of the langcom?