Still the case.

In T301737#7884214, @301295_kTH wrote:

but there is not any comment on the talk page of my task 3, if there are any improvements or any suggestions please let me know, it will help me in the future to improve my work.

Hi all, sorry for the delay in replying. Everyone now has replies on the talk page (basically, everyone's work was accepted as completed), and we'll take this work into account while assessing and deciding on the internship. Thanks everyone for your work during the contribution period!

@301295_kTH Task 2 looks good, you can count it as completed on Outreachy, sorry for the delay. I'll reply about the task 3 issue on the task 3 ticket.

@301295_kTH please see the 'Application and timeline' section of T300207 that describes how to do the timeline.

It's up to you, you can add them all, or just the one you think is most appropriate. You should put at least one URL per task though.

Hi all, sorry, something unexpected came up. I’ll check and comment on your tasks as soon as I can, but please go ahead and submit applications now, you don’t need to wait for the tasks to be checked first.

Hi @301295_kTH Nearly there! I've left feedback on the talk page, at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Varsha_ahirwar_from_India/Outreachy_2 . You can also find the article you should use for task 3 there.

@Prince418 Your proposal still seems substantially the same as Lennard's, just with some rewording and rearranging, which still isn't OK. I don't think you've tried the microtasks either? I'm not sure of the GSoC rules for submitting this, and the deadline is today.

In T301733#7859898, @301295_kTH wrote:

I have completed task 1, here is the link to my Wikimedia page - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Varsha_ahirwar_from_India/Outreachy_1.

Hi, @Bisola7 you have a reply in your email inbox, @Akandoria you have a reply on the talk page.

@LennardHofmann Thanks! Those changes look good. I can now see it in the Google dashboard. With "I might have to fix urgent bugs reported after the deployment of a key part, while I'm already working on the next feature" - yes, this is the norm when developing community-facing code!

Hi @LennardHofmann, this is looking good! I think you also have to submit this via Google's system (please make sure you do so!).

In T300207#7847279, @PinRathod wrote:

Hello Everyone, I'm Pinalee an Outreachy applicant from India. I want to contribute in this project. Looking forward to work with Wikimedia foundation. Thank you.

@PangolinMexico @Jiehui_Ma You have replies on the talk pages!

I've marked this as 'Closed to new applicants' on Outreachy as there are now several people that have completed all three tasks. The project is still open for contributions, though, and will remain so until the contribution period ends. And if anyone new still wants to have a go at the tasks, that's also fine.

In T301735#7842777, @Antima_Dwivedi wrote:

I have completed task 2 and expecting feedback from you.

In T301735#7840746, @Azaya89 wrote:

Hi @Mike_Peel, here's my completed task two attempt. I await your feedback, thanks!

https://github.com/Azaya89/Outreachy-Wikidata-project/blob/main/myscript.py

Note: I'm unable to create a new wiki page for my Outreachy task 2. I get an error message saying my IP has been blocked on all wikis due to Open Proxy. Is there a way to resolve this?

In T301733#7842935, @Akandoria wrote:

Here is the link to my webpage for Task 1: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Akandoria/Outreachy_1

Hi @Amitha67 and @Sonali.Rastogi welcome! Please try the first microtask to get started, see T301733

In T302098#7840913, @yedil_s wrote:

Hi! My name is Yedil Serzhan and I am studying for a Master's degree in Computer Science. I had experience with Lua while I was developing games that require fast execution. I would really like to work on this project. Do you suggest that should I start working on microtasks and reading through the codebase from now?

In T301733#7842314, @Appledora wrote:

Hi @Mike_Peel , I am very very late to the party. But I have started getting familiar with WikiData and creating my page. My question is probably redundant and dumb, but I am curious about what's your expectation from this microtask. For our created pages, would you prefer it be structured and represented in a conventional Wikipedia article style? Or would you rather prefer a more descriptive page (something like a jupyter notebook) that would represent the creator's thought process and explorations? Thanks.

@PangolinMexico You have a reply on the talk page.

In T300207#7829839, @Tamandeep_singh wrote:

I found this project very interesting and I have started doing the tasks provided by you.

Great - please have a go at the three starter tasks, and let me know when you're ready for me to look at your work!

@Azaya89 @Emmanuel-Wachukwu @Antima_Dwivedi You have replies on the talk/discussion pages for your tasks.

In T301735#7828235, @Jiehui_Ma wrote:

In T301735#7828215, @Mike_Peel wrote:

Yes, your understanding was correct. I've tried to clarify the task description accordingly, does that look better?

Thank you for updating and helping me confirm this! Based on these details, I think my codes and functions has followed the requirements.

I would be grateful if you could then check my submission and comment on my coding styles. If there are coding lines too vague for you to understand, plase feel free to tell me. I am still working on to improve my current contributions.

Thank you for your time!

In T301735#7826125, @Jiehui_Ma wrote:

I am a little unsure about my understanding upon this task:

Yes, your understanding was correct. I've tried to clarify the task description accordingly, does that look better?

Hi, everyone should have replies now (please check the discussion/talk pages of your submissions), please let me know if I've missed any!

In T301733#7809236, @Mike_Peel wrote:

Hi, I'm sorry, I'm temporarily unavailable - I'll reply as soon as I can, most likely on Tuesday.

In T301735#7809237, @Mike_Peel wrote:

Hi, I'm sorry, I'm temporarily unavailable - I'll reply as soon as I can, most likely on Tuesday.

In T301735#7807932, @Nafiya_Ahmed wrote:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Nafia-Ahmed/Outreachy_2 @Mike_Peel Please check this.

In T301735#7811315, @Kundaichasinda wrote:

Good day. I have encountered an error when I was trying to edit my script. My terminal is telling me that my username is not defined, but it is defined. In my user-config.py file I have this line of code, usernames['wikidata']['wikidata'] = 'Kundaichasinda', because Kundaichasinda is my username. May you please help

Hi, I'm sorry, I'm temporarily unavailable - I'll reply as soon as I can, most likely on Tuesday.

Hi, I'm sorry, I'm temporarily unavailable - I'll reply as soon as I can, most likely on Tuesday.

In T302101#7800908, @Ajay47 wrote:

Hi @Mike_Peel, I am Ajay from India. I have been working in web development where I worked on both frontend and backend programming languages. I like learning and working on different languages and technologies. I am very interested in working on this project.

Just to comment that the example came from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:LongPages - you can see the first page of these is either COVID or journal article items. It maybe a case of changing the approach of an editor or two on-wiki to avoid these situations arising, more than it requires software changes, though.

Just discovered this wasn't possible when trying to link Commons to Wikitech via Wikidata... (https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Clusters and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikimedia_servers should interwiki to each other) Any chance of it being implemented please?

In T301733#7782376, @SakshiKaushik wrote:

Hi,

Can I work on this task? I am an Outreachy Round 24 applicant and seems like Wikimedia aligns with my interest and experience.

Posted at https://github.com/fuddl/wd/issues/71 - closing this task. Thanks for the pointers for tracking the issue down.

Aah - if I disable https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Tools/Wikidata_for_Web then this issue goes away. So I guess I should report this to the plugin developer instead, I guess at https://github.com/fuddl/wd/issues since I'm not sure they are on Phabricator.

It happens in safe mode in Firefox, but does not happen in Firefox Private mode. It does not happen at all in Safari or Chrome. I'm using Extension:WikiEditor - but this is the [ edit | edit source ] links themselves, before you get to the editor.

In T302098#7739043, @srishakatux wrote:

Hi all! Our mentoring org application is under review. We are being asked by Google to provide additional information on projects - expected size of the project: 175 or 350 hours and difficulty rating: easy, medium, or hard. Based on my analysis, I have added two data points to each project on the GSoC 2022 page on MediaWiki.org. If you disagree with it, feel free to make additional changes.

@srishakatux Please could you include @Pigsonthewing as a mentor for the proposal on Outreachy (he's now registered on Outreachy under that username), and also give him view permissions for the Outreachy tickets?

In T300207#7729949, @srishakatux wrote:

In T300207#7729942, @Mike_Peel wrote:

Sure, could you remind me where to do that please?

Yes, step 4 here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Mentors#_Before_the_program

In T300207#7729925, @srishakatux wrote:

@Mike_Peel Also, upload the project on the Outreachy site whenever you feel ready, and I will then approve. Thank you!

In T299453#7713589, @srishakatux wrote:

@Mike_Peel Yes, works :) Also, are you still considering to promote T273109 via GSoC?

@srishakatux Thanks! Let's make a fresh start with the project description - follow-up is at T302098.

@srishakatux For Outreachy round 24, would T300207 work? It would be jointly mentored by me and @Pigsonthewing and builds on the work we've been doing for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_Q .

In T300649#7668843, @Mike_Peel wrote:

Something definitely went wrong with the extraction of the P1030 constraints - I'll look into that and provide an updated file, but for now you could just remove those lines (any containing 'P1030').

Something definitely went wrong with the extraction of the P1030 constraints - I'll look into that and provide an updated file, but for now you could just remove those lines (any containing 'P1030').

@JTannerWMF It might be interesting to look at the time between the edit and the rewriting/revert, rather than just looking within 30 days. I suspect there will be a long tail to this distribution that will extend much beyond 30 days (e.g., I've reverted cases after several months) - but I'm not sure how significant that will be.

@srishakatux Would T273109 be suitable for this round? Would require a student who knows Lua already, since I couldn't teach that myself.

I find it useful on Wikidata - when if an item is deleted, there's nothing left for non-admins to see but a QID and this short bit of text, which basically gives the label (the same as you'd see just from the page name of the deleted article on Wikipedias).

I've proposed this again for this year's wishlist, at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Miscellaneous/Improve_map_display_at_the_poles

I've proposed this on the 2022 Wishlist at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Reading/Display_links_to_sister_projects_on_mobile

I've proposed this on the 2022 Wishlist at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Reading/Display_links_to_sister_projects_on_mobile

Re-proposing for a 5th time on the community wishlist: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Miscellaneous/Check_if_a_page_exists_without_populating_WhatLinksHere