T310833 strikes again! As noted above, the screenshots are not visible :(

In T373711#11464890, @Escargot_rouge wrote:

With CodeMirror, there is now a lot of red waves under word that are not recognised by the browser
Would it be possible to tell browsers not to show these waves inside CodeMirror with Vue, JS, CSS ans Lua contentmodels?

Should go live with this week's train.

I don't have any data to definitively say what happened …

A RedirectSpecialPage class, as it is called, must always redirect. So the idea is to simply redirect to the homepage if given something invalid. We could throw an exception I suppose and catch it, showing an error similar to what you'd see with Special:WishlistIntake/Invalid, but this adds a lot of complexity for little gain, methinks. The main purpose of Special:Wishlist is for internal use in i18n messages, anyway.

The number of places where we have to check $wgWatchlistExpiry has grown since this task was filed. Running this by the MediaWiki Stakeholders' Group sounds fine. The only argument for keeping it is with third party usage. Such users here include myself and presumably Sam, who were also incidentally co-authors of this feature. But the line must drawn somewhere… I see folks asking for even more features with respect to watchlist expiry, so my opinion has since changed. At this point, the maintenance burden is probably outweighing the benefits of offering a simpler experience for smaller wikis.

In T373711#11437138, @IKhitron wrote:

I tried CodeMirror for a couple of times, and as for now it's not comforfable for me personally to work there.

In T373711#11436106, @IKhitron wrote:

Is there a way to opt out from this for CodeMirror Beta users?

CodeMirror 6 + the new modes have been running well on Beta for a while. Let's get this out to all Beta feature users next week to see what folks think :)

Okay, got it! Thanks. I'll get this fixed.

Sorry I missed the ping! Yes, it can be closed :) I don't think there has been a single complaint with Twinkle + temp accounts.

In T409402#11422655, @Diskdance wrote:

One link could be https://zh.wikipedia.beta.wmcloud.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&action=edit.

Seems to be resolved now? All rechecks worked for me in the past hour.

I've gotten this in two different repos:

• MediaWiki-extensions-CommunityRequests https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/quibble-vendor-mysql-php82/20276/console
• MediaWiki-extensions-CodeMirror - https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/quibble-vendor-mysql-php83/20377/console

0>>! In T409402#11354205, @Diskdance wrote:

It's highlighted in the image. As for CM6 for JavaScript, yes, it's included in the beta feature.

Based on the screenshot this is the old version of CodeMirror. You could try seeing if it works in the new version by going to your beta preferences and enabling "Improved Syntax Highlighting".

To be tested on the Beta cluster first.

In T410662#11407606, @GMikesell-WMF wrote:

@MusikAnimal, very minor, but can you review the AC2 Page History video? It's more of just the highlight at the end of the video.
…

6. ✅❓ AC2: Confirm that the summary does not report “Description updated.”

The status only changed but when comparing it shows status but also one of the tags highlighted for some reason even though it wasn't touched.

❓Page History	✅ Other Places
F70654132	F70654134