In the discussion on Meta, some people are giving good reasons for why that the word "block" would be potentially damaging to reputations. More so than the current sanctions like editing restriction or a topic ban that the partial block will be replacing or enforcing.

Thanks for the thorough testing!

Well, the important thing is whether or not we want unsubmitted AfC drafts, or does any draft count as unsubmitted? I think you said there were some 80,000 other drafts that aren't part of AfC, none of those have the "Draft AfC submissions" category.

Or actually... I should get clarification: Is "unsubmitted" meant to include drafts that aren't part of AfC? If it means anything, usually non-AfC drafts won't get submitted to AfC, because that requires adding the template and correct parameters, which newbies don't know how to do.

@MMiller_WMF It looks like Category:Draft AfC submissions contains only unsubmitted drafts, making our work a lot easier.

I don't think Earwig's Copyvios tool was built to search imagery and other media. Neither is CopyPatrol, hence removing the tag.

Thanks for the fine suggestion! The median is now shown whenever the log scale would automatically be shown, which a rough detection of a spike in the dataset. The formula used for this might need to be tweaked. I don't want to always show the median because I think many people might be confused by it.

Unrelated to the issue at hand:

Indeed this was fixed with T197281. Thanks

In T197555#4296399, @Lofhi wrote:

some people have had trouble disabling syntaxhighlight.

In T197592#4296759, @RoySmith wrote:

I don't know for sure that CodeMirror is that cause. I'm basing that simply on CodeMirror being recently enabled, and this is the first time I've noticed this. I tend to blame newly observed breakage on the most recent changes :-)

It's actually a highlighter, but I agree it looks like a pencil and thus may cause confusion.

Thank you!

Hope you don't mind me traiging as high priority.

Related T184857

Or actually, any page that Tyagiaman edited: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&format=json&prop=revisions&rvprop=sha1%7Cids%7Ctimestamp%7Ccomment&rvlimit=100&rvstartid=845694425&rvexcludeuser=Tyagiaman&indexpageids=true&redirects=true&titles=Prakash%20Vir%20Shastri

It's the combination of Tyagiaman and the Tyagi article. Without titles= I get an empty response: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&format=json&prop=revisions&rvprop=sha1%7Cids%7Ctimestamp%7Ccomment&rvlimit=100&rvstartid=845694425&rvexcludeuser=Tyagiaman&indexpageids=true&redirects=true

Thanks for closing the duplicate, mateg! I searched the board and couldn't find an existing task.

This was originally requested as part of T145912, when we were intent on using cu_changes to add public IP range contributions functionality. As I'm sure you recall we ended up creating the ip_changes table with T163562. As such, I'll close this since I'm unaware of any desire for it beyond the original use case. Thanks for your time!

Nice find, TheDJ! This issue came up again at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Permalink/845996645#Syntax_highlighting_will_no_longer_turn_off_/_Forced_into_2017_Editor (which I assume you were following)

In T197052#4284422, @Niharika wrote:

This does not seem like a problem. File(s) is fine for edit summaries.

It's just rare, I'm guessing. Pageviews Analysis is pulling this from the Pageviews-API, which returns zero: https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/metrics/pageviews/per-article/en.wikipedia/all-access/bot/Michael_Jackson/daily/2015070100/2018061400

Yes AutopatrolledCandidates, TopArticleReviewers and WishlistSurvey are part of the MusikBot repo but run as Community Tech bot. I have my own micro-framework which is why it's in the same codebase. One day I might make it into a library or submodule and we could then move those two tasks to their own repo. There's also the pain of setting up the Ruby environment on the community-tech-bot Toolforge account :/

I was just debugging this. The <ref></ref> link is put there by ChartInsert, right?

See also T62856. In my opinion we should support setting global preferences too via the API, to be consistent with the other APIs in MediaWiki.

In T196396#4281729, @zhuyifei1999 wrote:

Shall we take a backup of the files?

Which browser / operating system / skin?

👍 for setting the default to be by date. It seems this is usually what you'd want.

Done! Only took 3 months =P

Done! The timestamps of the first/latest edits are also now links.

Fine idea! We can make this happen