Every time people cannot find a proper term in a language they invent their own. So, jad?

@awight, I think you right and суд is not the best translation to Makedonian (to my Russian ear). Alternative: мислење
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%9A%D0%B5

Evaluation (Eval) ?

the results:

Seems like this feature is not very productive.
I ended up using the following regexes:

ok, this is my ver2:
from revscoring.features import revision_oriented, wikitext as wikitext_features
from revscoring.features.modifiers import sub
from revscoring.features.meta.aggregators import len
from revscoring.languages import english, features as language_features

For the infobox images strategy to be implemented in the most elegant way, it will require changes to both editquality and revscoring, which means two separate pull requests. Is that ok?
My plan is to add this into /feature_lists/enwiki.py
local_wiki = [ ....

sub(
    wikitext_features.revision.infobox_image_matching(
    r"(file|image\w*)\s*=\s*((file|image):)?([^\n\|]+.(jpe?g|png|gif|svg))"),
    wikitext_features.revision.parent.infobox_image_matching(
    r"(file|image\w*)\s*=\s*((file|image):)?([^\n\|]+.(jpe?g|png|gif|svg))"),
    name="enwiki.revision.wikilink.if_infobox_image_removed"
)

]

https://github.com/wiki-ai/wikilabels-wmflabs-deploy/pull/39

For English wikipedia, the change to assuming goodfaith edit when the actual label is null worked well. The AUC score grew from 0.909 to 0.928:

Here are some results of reviewing labels Damaging/Goodfaith and Damaging/Badfaith for enwiki and ruwiki: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Automated_classification_of_edit_quality/Work_log/2017-07-24#Labels.27_validity_test

**a note to the design of the new buttons: