User Details
- User Since
- Feb 26 2017, 8:31 PM (425 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Fajne Farita [ Global Accounts ]
Dec 14 2018
Every time people cannot find a proper term in a language they invent their own. So, jad?
Nov 5 2018
@awight, I think you right and суд is not the best translation to Makedonian (to my Russian ear). Alternative: мислење
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%9A%D0%B5
Aug 21 2018
Evaluation (Eval) ?
Aug 18 2017
the results:
Seems like this feature is not very productive.
I ended up using the following regexes:
Aug 14 2017
ok, this is my ver2:
from revscoring.features import revision_oriented, wikitext as wikitext_features
from revscoring.features.modifiers import sub
from revscoring.features.meta.aggregators import len
from revscoring.languages import english, features as language_features
Aug 11 2017
For the infobox images strategy to be implemented in the most elegant way, it will require changes to both editquality and revscoring, which means two separate pull requests. Is that ok?
My plan is to add this into /feature_lists/enwiki.py
local_wiki = [ ....
sub( wikitext_features.revision.infobox_image_matching( r"(file|image\w*)\s*=\s*((file|image):)?([^\n\|]+.(jpe?g|png|gif|svg))"), wikitext_features.revision.parent.infobox_image_matching( r"(file|image\w*)\s*=\s*((file|image):)?([^\n\|]+.(jpe?g|png|gif|svg))"), name="enwiki.revision.wikilink.if_infobox_image_removed" )
]
Jul 31 2017
Jul 26 2017
For English wikipedia, the change to assuming goodfaith edit when the actual label is null worked well. The AUC score grew from 0.909 to 0.928:
Jul 25 2017
Here are some results of reviewing labels Damaging/Goodfaith and Damaging/Badfaith for enwiki and ruwiki: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Automated_classification_of_edit_quality/Work_log/2017-07-24#Labels.27_validity_test
Jul 24 2017
**a note to the design of the new buttons: