In T243631#5885686, @Tchanders wrote:

Wiki	Wiki's name in canonical form	On-wiki user page (red or blue link depending on page existence)

Have been discussing this with @dmaza - this is trickier than a local user page because of being an external wiki. Could we make a separate task for this?
(I also wonder if a red link might be misleading since the text is the wiki name, but that might just be me!)

@Tchanders Should we move this to Done?

In T238782#5884950, @Tchanders wrote:

I have a few questions about the acceptance criteria:

• There is a new tab next to Preliminary check for Compare (need to come up with a better name though).

Should we make a separate task for coming up with a name?

Boldly closing this one as AHT has moved on to other projects now.

In T231577#5881113, @dom_walden wrote:

Briefly retested muting and unmuting users on Special:Mute on enwiki. Also checked that I could use it to mute globally (when I set the option globally).
Also tested Special:Mute on https://www.wikidata.org and https://commons.wikimedia.org.
I don't think I can test eventlogging on production.

Thanks for the task, @Tchanders. I updated the description with the mock.

@Tchanders Let's take that to a new ticket. I'll check-in with the users and Prateek and see if we can do this a different way. We can have a follow-up ticket for that link. For now it's okay to ignore it. I'll update the task description.

In T238782#5871128, @dmaza wrote:

@Niharika Usernames and IPs look like they are links. Where are they linking to?

Thanks @jwang!

FYI Special:Mute has been launched on all wikis today.

In T238782#5846183, @Demian wrote:

Yes, IP subnets (ISP) and vpn/proxy likelihood. If you have it in the plan, that's perfect. I was a bit concerned there was no reply in months ;-)
Grouping by subnet might be a fundamental design decision, that's worth thinking about in advance if it would be implemented.

I'll boldly mark this as resolved. Please reopen if you think that's not the case.

@jwang If you could export the existing analysis you've done so far and attach it to this ticket or link to it from here, that would be helpful.

I removed Figure out how often are the same users muted multiple times from this task description. It was an idea that came up in my meeting with @drochford. It would be more useful to collect that data after we've launched the feature changes and there's an uptick on mute list usage.

This is good to go. wmf16 has been rolled out everywhere. Let's get this out coming Monday.

We'll probably tackle this at some point after we have the basics of Preliminary check and Compare done.

In T243631#5853422, @Tchanders wrote:

@Niharika Adding this link would only make sense for WMF sites:

User's global contributions page (in the guc tool - https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/, no other place to do that)

If a third party was using Special:Investigate, it wouldn't make sense to send them here; they might get no results, or nonsensical results if there's a username match.

In T238782#5846160, @AronManning wrote:

@Niharika is this under consideration or will it be?

@dbarratt We had a conversation about this in a team meeting but I don't remember the outcome - will the user be able to run multiple investigations at once or will they not? I am perfectly happy either way but that will influence my choice of the mock we go with.

@Tchanders I updated the task description. The only weird thing is that there is no central global contributions page so we need to link to the toolsforge tool for global contribs.

In T238782#5839397, @dmaza wrote:

@Niharika @Prtksxna on the following point from the acceptance criteria There is a visual indicator to distinguish the usernames and IPs explicitly entered by the user.; What happens when the user enters and IP Range? Do we care to mark the ips in that range with the visual indicator too?

The visual indicator @Prtksxna picked in the mocks is that the usernames and IPs entered are in bold with a darker background:

Got it. Thanks for pointing that out @dmaza.

Putting a date of this as a reminder for us to enable the feature everywhere.

Thanks @DannyS712.

@Prtksxna Assigning this to @dmaza since he's working on it already but please add the missing mock (button/icon to add other users from the same IP to the results). Thanks!