Sounds good to me. I'll merge it tomorrow if Ed doesn't beat me to it.
Waiting on @Nirzar's review.
That's what I was thinking. I'm gonna ask Sati on her thoughts on this. Maybe once a day within the first week of the event and perhaps once a week for a month or two after. Hard to tell.
Think so too. Let's not create any limits for the time being.
@MusikAnimal How hard is it to get total number of bytes added and total number of bytes removed as a statistic? I imagine not too bad?
Why does the icon appear to have extraneous space to the right?
Mon, Mar 19
Yeah, I don't think we'd show retention between the dates, that would be confusing. The flat/downward trend makes sense according to the definition of retention being followed right now.
I think we're all done here.
This got resolved with that patch. Thanks, Sam!
Sun, Mar 18
Sat, Mar 17
Fri, Mar 16
I still think adding a "Submit" button makes most sense.
The Timeline displays an error message until 2 users, a wiki, and a start date are provided.
That sounds confusing to me.
Looks fine to me. One little thing - the "Last updated at" should have a suffix with the timezone. It's not obvious just by looking at it that it's in the event timezone.
Yep, that sounds like a great solution. I was under the impression that we were only looking at the TemplateData API and hence we didn't know if the template exists or not.
Increasing the priority on this.
Thu, Mar 15
I agree with Leon. I think this is a benefit of syntax highlighting where it helps identify incorrect syntax.
Wooo! This is deployed in production now! Thanks @MaxSem for all his work on this.
@MusikAnimal Interesting. We should have a way to make sure that the i18n we're fetching is not broken. Maybe a helper function that does a try/catch before handing us the string.
Oh, duh. :)
Na, I think we don't need a script. We can manually update 'em.
Wed, Mar 14
For https://tools.wmflabs.org/grantmetrics/programs/2018_Black_Lunch_Table/BLT_hosts_Art_and_Feminism_2018_@_Triangle, the retention is still counted for all participants and not just new editors. Bug?