The linked patch(es) do work for our tasks but are (partially) red because wikibase QA still walks the added folders - working on that (yay, monorepo).
Mon, Jun 17
According to the blubber documentation, a blubber file is expected to have", at minimum, two variants (1) test and (2) production"
Sat, Jun 15
With this deployed (T225858) to beta we can now witness verbose information in the logs, e.g. a crafted mismatch of entity id to revision id:
Fri, Jun 14
Would be great to get word from the MediaWiki-extensions-CentralAuth people if they have a suspicion where this problem originates from.
While researching this we filed T225814.
I would be happy if we could close this story despite this (unrelated) incident. Verification of the AC of this story should be possible by logging in through the login page of the mobile beta site.
@Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE was kind enough to showcase this to me, click path is a follows
- open mobile item page (trough useformat=mobile query not m. subdomain), e.g. https://wikidata.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Q11&useformat=mobile
- click "edit pen"
- click "log in" in the overlay
- login page in desktop layout opens
- logging in with correct credentials
- item page (same item as before) in desktop layout opens
- scroll to bottom, click the "Mobile view" link
- item page (same item as before) in mobile layout opens (trough m. subdomain)
- warning is shown "Central login - You are centrally logged in. Reload the page to apply your user settings."
- the page behaves as if not logged in
- reloading does not resolve this - message re-appears, page behaves as not logged in
Thu, Jun 13
@Lea_WMDE It would be interesting to see under which circumstances this (the "Central logi" overlay) happens for you - I can't really reproduce this. Even if it does not sound like it could be our fault it should still be reproducible.
Wed, Jun 12
Tue, Jun 11
Thu, Jun 6
Wed, Jun 5
Reminded me of T195402
Tue, Jun 4
Mon, Jun 3
Still the case as of today.
Given this is something we have to and will do at some point, but not a blocker to production (never was), there is little value of preserving an outdated column for it - moving.
Wed, May 29
Tue, May 28
Updated the description
Mon, May 27
Fri, May 24
I'm not quite sure what to do about this. I created a patch to reflect the changes requested but am uncertain if I should hand it in to the other devs to review or if there will be more input about the questions stated above.
Thu, May 23
Wed, May 22
I looked into your change requests - thanks for the very precise instructions. There are a few questions, though.
Tue, May 21
This is now on beta: https://wikidata.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Item:Q11&useformat=mobile
Despite being a subtask of T221831 I put it into product review as it was created / arrived there after the fact.
Mon, May 20
This was created in the wake of T223542 to allow for discussion before we invest time.
@Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE We can certainly do that (at +/- identical effort). The proposal was based on the idea of "returning to a state as if the overlay did not happen", i.e. returning control to the user where we interrupted her. Without the overlay the "publish" button would be focused, hence the proposal. Please mend as you see fit!
@Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE I had another brain wave - please verify that the latter part also makes sense.