This is how it looks on 15,6" notebook (cs.wikipedia.org).

1. Overlapped text.
2. I don't like also the second sliding bar but it is probably necessary for smaller displays.
3. Cat-a-lot overlaps V22 button.

I am sorry for the late reply. Thank you so much for your extensive message. I hope it will be possible in the future (as technologies are faster and faster these days). :)

@matmarex @ppelberg I think people should be able to change the look of the button to the original one. Is there any CSS/JS to bring it back?

Can I turn it on if I am not selected?

Browsers: Chrome, Internet Explorer, originally reported by David V. to me, forwarded to @Whatamidoing-WMF

Not only mobile app but also mobile web: T294636

Note: Topic Subscription Tool creates link to the specific comments but when pinging, it still links to the section.

Oh, good point – it is as you said, @matmarex. Excuse me for encroaching your and Peter's time.

Please see T284821, maybe it is related to this task.

Now it works but in "Console" is one error.

I do not like the current interface. I always click on "View as a normal wiki page" because it is better for me.
Reasons:

1. Some content is not available (for example templates like https://cs.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0ablona:%C4%8Cl%C3%A1nek_WikiProjektu_Simpsonovi)
2. Replying is not clear, I cannot see how many colons (:) is there (I must count them).
   
3. I can reply only to the last comment.
   
4. I also cannot see the first discussion without a title.
   

In a nutshell, it is bad and I am happy that you will work on that. Thanks in advance! 🙂

Yes, it works for me too, I cannot replicate it now.

If it is possible on Turkish projects, it would be fair for it to be done on Czech ones as well. I would like it to be easier, but task T42465 has been here since 2012 and not being worked on it (probably). The configuration change is a relatively easy operation, I think. If these icons will be changed, you can write to me or at Pod lípou where will someone help with translation.

Another request: https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:W68h41l5pzxio9eo

Another request from user @Ijoe2003 here.

BTW when I click on the setting button, it will open #mw-prefsection-rendering. Would it be possible to add a link to the concrete section? For example, this link referees to the concrete section: #mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Thanks in advance.

@Esanders Will it be enabled or disabled as default?

Hrm, after reloading I cannot see any icons… And ?safemode=1 does not help.

In T269471#6671944, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

The current beta feature for the reply tool is called Discussion tools. Does this mean that the same preference will control both? (I have no problem with that, just think that it’s important enough that it should be decided on explicitly.) Also the variable controlling beta vs opt-out (currently opt-out on arwiki, cswiki and huwiki, T249394) is called $wgDiscussionToolsBeta—I’m pretty sure you don’t really want to make this work-in-progress feature opt-out on these wikis. (@matmarex, as far as I understand the patch, it would do exactly this, so please fix that before merging.)

@ppelberg Thanks for the info. I find out new error, which should be important to fix before deployment as a beta feature – see T274974.

Hrm, right now it is again at cswiki (1.36.0-wmf.30 (ef13e33)).

In T274783#6831758, @ppelberg wrote:

@Patriccck: we appreciate you filing this task. Can you share more about the unique disadvantages advanced users may encounter when using the New Discussion Tool?

David, perfect, thanks for the info. If I'm not mistaken, there will be a tutorial before the first use of the New discussion tool. It would be great to mention that you can use the old way by opening the "add topic" link in a new tab (using CTRL and click on the "add topic" link).

Perfect, thanks. I support the Reply Tool on the mobile web but it must work :-).

Hmm, there was a link yesterday but now I cannot see it. Was there any software change? For example, here is the [reply] link (but it is maybe intention).

@ppelberg Hello, please see Meta – Stewards Elections. There is a good voting style I think. What do you think about it?

Of course. I see this error message when I click at [ reply ] (instead of reply form):

@Whatamidoing-WMF Please write it here.

@Tacsipacsi Uploaded. I hope that it is OK (what about a licence?)

@Tacsipacsi Is it OK, now? The only icon is not here, I do not why (see original file).

@ppelberg That is the problem, I do not understand how works translateable pages at mediawikiwiki, therefore I noted it here.

BTW this page should be probably updated too. There is no info about Reply tool and New discussion tool.

Do you expect that some discussions are partly voting and partly classic? See this.

And another request for this, from the Czech Wikipedia (user F.ponizil, private messages). He also wants special toolbar in source mode witch special characters [, ], {, }. I agree – it can be a quick way to add special characters.
Be the way, he also wants support for this type of discussion like this, see T259865.

Peter, will there be something like ?dtenable=1 in Reply Tool (for example ?dtenable=2 for New Discussion Tool)? See https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedie:Pod_l%C3%ADpou_(technika)/Archiv_2020-1#Reply_tool

Hi there, is there any preliminary date of deploy?

Related talk page: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Vzs4ur30kpi1ef5t

Another example here.