1. Proposed entry points

As suggested by @SGautam_WMF, we can move the "Notability Risk Warning" before the "References" step. For cases where the risk assessment indicates that sources are mandatory, we can enforce that in the later step. In this way, we won't be asking for sources to create a biography that later won't allow the user because of the notability restrictions.

For the notability check, as a starting point we can consider a simplified way to define the conditions.
We could capture some conditions as tags that can be combined:

1. Observations on current entry points

@MNeisler pinging in case you know about some existing analysis showing any data on the current entry points people use to get to Visual Editor on mobile.

Thanks for sharing the initial thinking on how to approach this technically, @SBisson. Overall, it makes sense to me, and I like how existing elements (wiki pages and Wikidata items) are re-used. Some thoughts and questions to understand the implications below:

EditCheck support for citation needed seems quite useful to surface a relevant opportunity to contribute.

In T260131#11473804, @ngkountas wrote:

@Pginer-WMF the "Publish as a new section" option is available on mobile for non-lead sections. The screenshot you shared above is for a present lead section. For lead sections, we do not include the "Publish as a new section" option, because we do not have any target section title that we can use for such publishing. If we want to support the "Publish as a new section" option, too, what target section title do you think we should use?

Thanks @cchen for the useful analysis.

I went ahead and merged T115045: ContentTranslation issues with references (tracking) since having two trackers does not make sense now that we have just one version of the tool.