Mon, May 22
Unless there are any objections, on 29th May 2017 I'll decline the tasks (or move them to another project) and archive the project.
Unless there are any objections, on 29th May 2017 I'll decline all the tasks and archive the project.
@Prtksxna This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
We need to remove this task from the Gruntfile as well - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/wikimedia-ui-base/browse/master/Gruntfile.js;013cf2bc7e6ebe819d5297bb6886b3d6bec9d02b$14. With the package removed grunt will complain.
Sun, May 21
Sat, May 20
Fri, May 19
@Volker_E Should we Decline this task?
Thu, May 18
I am attempting to document things that are needed by OOjs-UI /src/themes/mediawiki/common.less and aren't present in rWMUI WikimediaUI Base /wikimedia-ui-base.less. Some of them might not even need to be in in rWMUI WikimediaUI Base and will stay in OOjs-UI, but I'll try to document all.
Not saying that there is no problem with the radios, but that particular usage is more confusing than the rest. The distance between the two options, and the added circle for help don't convey any hierarchy.
Wed, May 17
Update documentation on Mediawiki: Index and Cards and Layouts.
Tue, May 16
Mon, May 15
If chunks of paragraphs are alright then should T164449: Consider a static site generator for WikimediaUI Styleguide. It still doesn't make things super-easy for the contributor but at least makes i18n possible.
We are already using Middleman for the Transparency Report, and so I have some experience with it.
Wed, May 10
Thu, May 4
Wed, May 3
I too prefer the compact version.
Tue, May 2
Thanks for the links @Jdforrester-WMF! I think I oversimplified the question though.
For example, I was more in favour of Less styles to be compiled on the fly on the browser (despite the performance tax) rather than requiring an extra compilation step, although I understand developers considering these priorities in a different order.
Thanks for your reply @Pginer-WMF! Sorry for taking this task a bit off-topic, moving the discussion to T164246: Discuss build process used in Wikimedia UI Style guide.
Mon, May 1
@Pginer-WMF gave me the impression that we don't want any build tools so that setting up the repo for a contributor is super simple. Is this an exception for a very limited use case, or did I have the wrong impression?
Fri, Apr 28
Wed, Apr 26
Apr 24 2017
Apr 23 2017
Is this to be run locally by people contributing to the style guide? Not by some CI, right?
Apr 22 2017
@Volker_E, sounds good, updated patch.
Apr 20 2017
Apr 19 2017
@matmarex, wow, thanks for the script! Do you think the same bot could be run for both pl and de?
Apr 18 2017
Apr 17 2017
That looks like a screenshot of ve.ui.WMCategoryWidget, not mw.widgets.CategorySelector.