@Platonides, since we won't be making the rest of the changes, would it be ok to close this task now?

In T207203#4744986, @Niharika wrote:

I like it. We should make this into a separate ticket though. We can discuss there whether this specific design is feasible to implement or not.

In T209523#4749051, @Volker_E wrote:

Meant, that workboard description and README.md of the wmf-theme differ. I would dump the workboard description and mostly only point to latter as those places got left behind until the next person is possibly frustrated.

@Volker_E Do you mind if I put this task up for GCI?

Thanks for the screenshots! The Gitlab font choice looks good. @Volker_E, is it ok if I put this task up for GCI?

Thanks for the patch Arcayn. Looks good.

Thanks for the patch Mogmog123. Looks good.

Added a proposed design, looking for feedback 👨🏽‍💻

Some more design related stuff:

Thanks for pointing out these issues @Volker_E. I've fixed the typos and updated the clone command to include the submodules. Can you try and test again?

Updated T207911: Inform users that Updating metrics is blocked for x minutes based on the discussion in said meeting.

From the description:

The user will need to refresh the page to use the Update button again.

@Nirzar, I've converted the text to outlines and updated the website. Could you confirm that this image is alright?

In T202592#4743532, @atgo wrote:

@Prtksxna I just adjusted the time range and it works: https://piwik.wikimedia.org/index.php?module=CoreHome&action=index&idSite=18&period=day&date=yesterday#?idSite=18&period=month&date=2018-11-12&category=General_Actions&subcategory=General_Outlinks

In T202773#4716505, @TBolliger wrote:

In my opinion every input field should extend to match the endpoint of the pages and namespace input fields.

Is it ok to have an indeterminate progress bar below the image while it updates. Adding anything on top of the image might obscure part of what the person is translating — https://codepen.io/anon/pen/WYoVNy

@Volker_E, could you confirm that the above VMs are safe to delete. I don't think we need them any more.

In T205496#4725651, @jmatazzoni wrote:

It's not a big deal, but I was a little in the dark at first. @Prtksxna, what do you think?

In T208554#4725905, @atgo wrote:

I'm not sure what this would look like and where it would link. Preference is to keep things simple and clear rather than clutter with additional elements. @Prtksxna what would this look like?

Same as @atgo, I am able to see the outlink actions in the individual report, but the Outlinks report says that there is no data -

Thanks @ArielGlenn!

I tried the interface with some mock data and reducing the margin by such a little bit isn't making much of a difference. Given that this page won't be getting used much on mobile, and the change I suggested makes no significant improvement, let us just stick with Alex's original design on Minerva too 😊

I think the points that @dbarratt has written are appropriate and we can go ahead with them. Do you need me to mock these up (I am guessing no, but still asking before un-assigning myself)?

From the description:

• I would also suggest linking the topics of the first paragraph to the corresponding portals: historia, deportes, arte.
• I'm not too keen about defining it as "gratuita" instead of "libre", although there may be good reasons to use that (what about "libre y gratuita"?). See also https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:La_enciclopedia_libre

Thank you so much, @Dzahn!

This is OOUI territory indeed — T188886: TagMultiSelectWidget misleadingly leaves uncommitted input text visible when unfocused

From the description above:

Next update permitted at hh:mm (timezone/location notation). Last updated hh:mm.
…
Last updated 2018-10-29 18:49 (Africa/Accra).

Thanks @Nuria! Could you point me to some documentation on how to login to and see the data in Piwik?

Hey @Nuria, the URL is going to be bienvenida.wikimedia.org.

Reducing the margins and widths a bit we should be able to keep indentation on mobile. @dbarratt, do you think this would be possible?

In T207776#4703078, @jmatazzoni wrote:

Did you add it because you feel that the more descriptive message was not clear enough? Or just from habit?

In T207776#4703982, @aezell wrote:

If we are counting wikis and there's no notion of time left, then it seems fine.

In T207816#4704031, @Dzahn wrote:

How about bienvenida.wikimedia.org ?

In T206495#4695416, @jmatazzoni wrote:

Edit list screen

• Also please add the "last updated..." anotation to the screen.

In T206483#4695450, @Niharika wrote:

@Prtksxna Dunno if this got mentioned before so I'll mention it - the Filters are not optional. The user needs to mandatorily add participants currently and in future it might change to either participants or category. In either case, the design should not suggest that the Filtering is optional because it's not. It seems to do so right now because the filters are at the bottom and the wording does not make it clear that it's required. Collapsing them by default might also lead to people skipping over them.

In T207816#4699091, @Dzahn wrote:

@Prtksxna Is this a dynamic page with scripting or is it a static page with just HTML/CSS and some images?

@Dzahn thanks for all the suggestions! I am wondering how we'll deploy our static site* by setting up a redirect on a wiki, would you be able to help with that?

Patches still awaiting review:

• https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/jsdoc/wmf-theme/+/465930
• https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/oojs/core/+/405544