Thanks for pointing this out @dom_walden. You're right things have gotten inconsistent with the capitalization and the naming of the product. I've created T311683: IP Info: Audit capitalization in messages to track this. If the initial scope of the task is complete, would it be okay to move this to the done column and do the other changes as part of the new task?

https://github.com/erelsgl-at-ariel/oop-5778/blob/master/README.md
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2258028/rtl-in-markdown

https://github.com/dear-github/dear-github/issues/275

‫امين

⁧امين

r ⁧ (Right-To-Left Isolate) i

‫ בתיקיה זו ישנם קבצים משלושה סוגים:

º סיכומים לקורס "מבוא לתיכנות מונחה עצמים"

1. ‫ סיכומים לקורס "מבוא לתיכנות מונחה עצמים"

&#x202b;test מה זה? YES<br/>

Thanks @bmartinezcalvo. I've updated the new usage examples to use these colors.

Since the we have a thicker stroke width now we might want to consider using some gray instead of the black when the icon is being used for the help popup.

Thanks for the ping @RHo. I've created the task to update the icon now.

My mistake. I uploaded images from an incorrect file. Sorry! Updated now.

In T309829#8015829, @Tchanders wrote:

@Prtksxna 'Connection type' is currently not displayed if it is the same as 'Connection owner', and instead is shown as 'Not available'. Since this now means the data is missing, I've changed this in the patch I've uploaded, so that it now displays even if it's the same. Is this ok? If not, what should we do?

In T309830#8015672, @dom_walden wrote:

Notice that the Not Available is also in italics. @Prtksxna do we want that removed as well?

@AGueyte would it be safe to say that all the headings + one line data would be a common use-case? Can we use that height to be the default height of the open box during the loading state (for those who have already accepted the T&C?

In T308649#7998500, @Tchanders wrote:

Thanks for the mockup. If you could provide some copy for the messages then I'll file a follow-up task.

Thanks for explaining this Thalia!

Thanks @Tchanders. Wanted to confirm that the time out error (last one in the table) isn't recoverable and trying again later won't help.

@Tchanders and I discussed that we need to categorize the error states a bit more:

• How likely is the user to see this error?
• Can they recover from the error? How?
• Is there information that they'd need to share with us for debugging purposes?

@Tchanders and I discussed this and were trying to figure out how much we should support this use case:

• Clicking the popup takes you to the full information page so all the data is accessible
• There are some places where the scroll is working fine
• Figuring out the places where scrolling isn't working might be a bit out of scope (OOUI / browser behavior)
• Not having the click action be triggered when clicking on a scroll bar inside of the popup might get very hacky

@Tchanders and I were talking about this and felt that users trying to interact with a menu while a guided tour is going on is definitely an edge case. Since there doesn't seem to be a clear way to fix this, we propose dropping this ticket. What do you think @Niharika?

Talked to @Niharika and @Isaac about this and they both think that no date would be a good option. Niharika mentioned that it's okay even if it's slow, since it'll show the entirety of the overlap. Isaac said that we could narrow it down to 1 year or 6 months if it becomes too slow.

Thanks @Krinkle! Yep makes sense to have it take up the prerequisite amount of space from the beginning. There have been some conversations around the "shimmering rectangle" loading animation that might make sense here, but that is a different task altogether (both for design systems and dev).

In T307659#7931983, @Niharika wrote:

My opinion is that if the log line is showing up and the IP address is visible, we should show the IP popup as usual to be consistent. @Prtksxna what do you think?

@MusikAnimal from your experience, do you think it’d be useful to have the number of edits and actions separately, as in (2 edits/3 actions)? Or is it ok to bundle them together, as in (5 edits/actions)?

The spd-test tool has this and is linking to the interaction timeline between the user that was queried and the the user in the row. While I think its useful, I'm not sure if we want to officially link to an external tool (that I think this team built) from a MediaWiki extension. @Niharika what do you think?

Thanks for flagging @AGueyte!

Thank you so much Jennifer! This is really helpful. I think the main thing that we were looking for was the 95% of users have no more than 5 IPs. This could serve as a proxy for how many IPs will be behind most temporary user accounts. But I'm also wary of temp account having significantly different behaviors.

@STran I've updated the mock and the question. In a meeting with @Tchanders we discussed that the question might change before deployment but we can use this for the performance and security(?) reviews.

• Changed "Find similar users" to "Find similar editors" (since the special page name is now Similar Editors, not Similar Users)

1. Is this OK?

We're reverting back to the old icon (T306041: Use 'info' icon for the popup button) and so this task might be applicable again.

In T301940#7847167, @STran wrote:

@Prtksxna could you clarify what you mean by this?

Thanks for raising this @AGueyte! I'm still working on a resolution for T301938: IPInfo: Use infoFilled for the popup button. Since there is a possibility of reverting back to the old icon let's keep this one open for now. I'll make sure to update this once we make progress on the icon.

Yep, the feature would be relatively obscure. The most common place that I see this being used would be on top of RecentChanges and History, and only for those who have the needed roles.

A taller popup on Timeless is alright. Thank you for sharing the screenshots @dom_walden!

We talked about this and a related ticket (T280666: Extend color and size guidelines of the Wikimedia Design System icon set ) on the design Slack. Based on that I wanted to note some alternatives:

1. Go back to using the old info icon
2. Use the new infoFilled icon at 16px on Base30 (#72777d). The issue with this is that the icon will look pixelated and we'd probably have to use the opacity hack to get the icon to be the right color (no sure about this?)
3. Update the info icon in OOUI (maybe use the Growth one F35027935) so that its more visible

Yep, makes sense to add more details there. Based on @STran's understanding, I think @Nikerabbit is right, it is meaning 2 from that link.

Thanks for picking this up Kieran! I really like the proposals! 💯
As @Volker_E mentioned we should widen the conversation. @iamjessklein thoughts on how we could do that?

In T301939#7788226, @dom_walden wrote:

@Prtksxna There are some inconsistencies between how this looks on different skins. Do we want to make them all the same?

In T301939#7763973, @Tchanders wrote:

@Prtksxna Do we want to add extra space between the items, or is this task only to fix the space around the outside?

Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that we use only padding. Whatever is the best technical way to achieve this effective padding should be alright.