In T278192#7158132, @elukey wrote:

Added a request to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories/Requests for the new repo!

In T280197#7067687, @hashar wrote:

I have send a tentative patch upstream to url encode POST made to conduit: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/plugins/its-phabricator/+/305522

I've just taken such a backtrace dump and pushed it as P14957

As Majavah said, it just happened again. I've restarted apache on gerrit1001, which again made the issue go away for now.

@CKoerner_WMF I've been told that all new repos should live in our Gerrit. I can create a Gerrit repo for you, and the code you upload there will get pushed to GitHub automatically. (This is a 1-way replication though. Gerrit overwrites GitHub. Changes on GitHub don't flow back to Gerrit.)

(Just for reference if others read this in future: valerio.bozzolan is currently owner of all repos underneath wikimedia-it in our gerrit. So this is not a policy issue, as he could add people/adjust projects on his own)

The repo has been created.

The Repo has been created.

Not sure if we want to have that plugin or even look into it. I guess with the GitLab switch on the horizon, the answer is a “No”.

The Gerrit repo is now ready to use.

I don't have much opinion on which test results to include. @Krinkle suggested on https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/609519/2/modules/gerrit/files/homedir/review_site/static/gerrit-theme.html#277 to limit to only "Main test build succeeded" comments, which led to omitting the results of the other tests.

In T268020#6631592, @hashar wrote:

From Luca, we can put the extra .jar in $GERRIT_SITE/lib like we did previously for the mysql connector. Gerrit adds that path to CLASSPATH and it thus discovers jar in there automagically. Or in short: no need to mess with systemd configuration / environment variables.

After seeing T268009, that task indeed looks like the culprit for the behaviour described here. I'm afraid, it will have to wait until T268009 is fixed :-(

In T268009#6627009, @hashar wrote:

Upstream provides a .war file, unfortunately we still build our own Gerrit since we need at least one cherry pick on top of their stable-3.2 branch.

The link https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter/+/dashboard/default:recent works for me and shows the dashboard.
And https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/admin/repos/mediawiki/extensions/AbuseFilter,dashboards shows the list of dashboards as it should.

I briefly tested log.jsonLogging for the 3.2 upgrade. According to my notes, the format for @timestamp is slightly different (Z as timezone vs. +0000. That's more of a pain on the Java side than one wants to), the @version differs, and IIRC exceptions are slightly different.

I removed you from the mediawiki, labs-tools-wikibugs2, wikimedia-portals, and Gerrit Managers Gerrit groups ;-(

@MarkAHershberger: The Gerrit/Git part of the unarchiving is done. Can I leave the rest (Extension's Wiki page etc) to you?

You're right, that we're trying to use CamelCase names for new extensions.
But for one reason or the other, you'll find quite a few repos where naming is inconsistent. Like all lowercase. All uppercase. Abbreviations not using consistent casing (E.g.: API vs. Api).

I've just created the gerrit repo mediawiki/extensions/IPInfo. The Phabricator mirror is at rEIPI.

I just hope this is a temporary glitch.

According to Gerrit's backend storage, the above mentioned changes are both starred by you. So the emails you received are expected.

In T257218#6375473, @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote:

Shame about T257218#6342783, I really liked it (and didn’t vote in the poll for that reason). But okay.

Since it seems the second poll with the circled original gerrit did not happen, I'll try to move forward with the green git icon (winner of V21).

In T259147#6365032, @hashar wrote:

I have at least a couple use cases:

In T230743#6363028, @mpopov wrote:

Requested analytics/wmf-product/jobs Gerrit repo

The poll has ended. 54 people voted.

It seems we're left now with too many choices to move forward :-)

Yup, that's not good.

Making the web UI work, would need more than just a few adaptions. Hence, declining.

In T48148#6316142, @Tgr wrote:

On Gerrit master CI checks are rendered differently, so you can't quote them anyway.

In T257218#6316146, @Tgr wrote:

Where is the logo from? I would have expected to find it on Commons but didn't.

Nice! Thanks for confirming.

As explained in the bug description above, our comments/reviews/... are not getting sent to a third party. Hence, closing this bug.

The Repo got created yesterday

Repo has been created.

In T257218#6300373, @Tgr wrote:

We could also make the favicon a little more distinct, e.g. enlarge the git icon in the middle to overlap the circle and touch the edges of the image. I can attempt that (not right now but eventually) if you think that's a reasonable approach.

In T257218#6300204, @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote:

For what it’s worth, I find it much harder to identify WMF Gerrit tabs now

In T257218#6299492, @Tgr wrote:

It's common for websites to have a different logo and favicon, [...]

In T257218#6299451, @Tgr wrote:

Did we use a different favicon previously?

Is this functionality intentionally disabled?