Yeah. I don't see any particular reason to roll this back for 1.35.

What version of MW?

MW-1.33-release wasn't marked as archived, done now (also updated the description)

Removing MW-1.33-release as it's EOL

In T257837#6301659, @sbassett wrote:

In T257837#6301387, @Reedy wrote:

We can in theory use generic-node10-docker like the design/landing-page repo does..

Is this likely to remain just static html and browser JS? Or Node for anything more serious?

Thanks :)

We can in theory use generic-node10-docker like the design/landing-page repo does..

Whatever we do here... We should probably also give back to Research and enable it there too, as from what I can see, their repo doesn't have any CI

Request added at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gerrit/New_repositories/Requests/Entries&diff=prev&oldid=3961344

Is this still an issue?

The information includes single-letter abbreviations for time units.

Unfortunately not.

Python social_core incorrectly escapes text in AuthException

Unfortunately, I think you've misunderstood the point of the parent task. That is requesting it for Wikimedia wikis, not for third party hosted wikis, which we can't do anything about

I suspect it's a case that Content Pages are expected to be higher traffic, and therefore there's more benefit from having caches for them...

It does look like TimedMediaHandler has at least some support for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV1 as part of the WebM handler

It probably also requires a Product type decision of whether "we" want to do this

Marking stalled as per T257652; there's a lot of prep work that needs doing before this is done

Marking stalled as per T257652; there's a lot of prep work that needs doing before this is done

I suspect this task tree doesn't make much sense in the order its in...

In T256079#6298125, @Jdlrobson wrote:

Anyone able to look into this one? Should be a simple one - adding '1.35' as a parameter to the hook execution!

We don't bundled TemplateStyles, so it won't be.

In T257507#6298076, @Isarra wrote:

If the IP block exempt right onwiki also works (at least some of the time) per T254568, maybe I should just go request that? I never bothered because I so rarely actually edit anything anymore, but if it also covers this, that would be an actual reason to request it. Also then maybe I'd actually bother to update documentation on mw.org slightly more often...

Mostly good to go (from the security side) next week. I note there isn't a seperate task for Privacy, and I don't know if James has anything too much to say, but will leave it open for him.

In T257623#6296096, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

@Reedy Thanks for the patch! Is there any chance to get this deployed today? I know WMF employees want to enjoy the weekend, but volunteers enjoy the weekend by editing Wikipedia and might create inferior CSS rules to work around this issue before Monday.

Looks like it, yeah.

Setting $wgDebugRedirects = true; makes an HTML page appear, seems it's almost certainly not a apache config issue

In T257578#6293762, @Varnent wrote:

There is definitely an interest in modifying the configuration of Governance Wiki to allow folks to have accounts again, participate in talk pages with them, and also help with translation of content. I think achieving those things is basically a matter of getting some engineer time to do the complicated things necessary to do things like the SUL activation and effective engagement methods for translator and people with feedback or questions.

This is at least partially a dupe of T205347: Enable SUL accounts on Governance wiki

Stalling until next weeks train has been run and the script is then on all WMF deployed MW branches

I ran the essence of that script against outreachwiki earlier, so the block should've been removed now

Caused by rMW0abb9338f870: Mostly drop old comment schemas