User Details
- User Since
- Nov 22 2023, 10:30 PM (125 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- SToyofuku-WMF [ Global Accounts ]
Thu, Apr 9
🫡🫡🫡
Wed, Apr 8
Thu, Mar 26
Steph is reviewing (although it seems like @aude is too)
Tue, Mar 24
Confirmed everything looks good, thank you!!
Fri, Mar 20
^ I have no memory of moving this from QA :o
Gonna be bold and move this to stalled as there is ongoing discussion around the approach in slack
Mar 12 2026
Patchdemo is now working: https://ca06638f4e.catalyst.wmcloud.org/wiki/Sdkjbskdjbfksjdfksdf
Patchdemo was just down and is back up, but I'm getting database errors that don't seem to have anything to do with what I changed - while I'm debugging that, here are screenshots as promised:
Some clear limitations with quicksurveys out of the box 🙃
Mar 11 2026
Mar 10 2026
Proof of concept (w tests) added - some of the aforementioned features are missing, but don't feel the hardest to prove out. Jon and I should talk about batch processing/failure modes/atomic writes, as well as the structure of the data and stuff like local vs global users when he gets back
Steph to work on updating the description a bit to reflect what's needed
Mar 9 2026
To be moved to sign off before the end of the sprint
To be carried forward to sprint 16 - also to be reviewed by a committee of Amir, Steph, and Anne (at minimum! feel free to also take a look)
Mar 5 2026
Got a working script up - remaining todos:
- stream the file so we're not loading potentially 2GB into memory
- spend some time thinking about batch processing/failure modes/atomic writes
- add dry run functionality
- proof of concept the tests bc otherwise they won't get written ):
This is in line with what I remember - thanks for taking the time to look into it and write up the finer points!
Mar 4 2026
From meeting: on Reader Experience, we're going to treat this as a spike - as it stands the work to review seems spooky so let's try to demystify it!
Work would include creating a new quicksurvey component that can be reusable for other data collection endeavors in the future - to be discussed potentially
Mar 3 2026
Mar 2 2026
To be reevaluated after T417403 is complete (from both a product/design and engineering perspective)
Release should happen tomorrow (Tuesday, March 3rd)
Medium in the context of this sprint - will raise in priority proportional to the proximity to March 15th
Feb 27 2026
Believe this is now done, but feel free to correct me @AnneT!!
Also reviewing this one - in theory I should be following my own guidance of clearing out code review column before starting something new 🙃
Feb 26 2026
✋ someone on Reader Experience picking it up
And now it has been reviewed
I suppose if I'm reviewing it I can also put my face on it
Feb 25 2026
To be done in sprint 16
This got merged (thank you Bernard!!)
That seems reasonable to me - as long as we're sure we'll have time pre-GA, beta feature seems like the right place for us to strengthen the foundations and make sure we're "doing things the right way" (for now we can use the data wherever it is available)
Feb 24 2026
This will likely involve a codex release - possibly fix forward, but either way try to fix by the end of the week
From meeting: ensure that no matter what (whether username is there or not), this should link to the "all pages" view - make sure custom lists are not accessible
holding space for instrumentation work getting done this sprint while we determine scope
On hold until tech news March 1st
Feb 19 2026
Thank you @Volker_E for catching!! There is indeed a patch for review 🙃
Steph reviewing
Feb 18 2026
Explicitly and formally a proof of concept ticket - no code will be merged, but this will give us something to talk about, and prove out the envisioned approach with local testing 🤞
Feb 4 2026
Jan 28 2026
(I'm also looking for the right place to document our thoughts around reduce motion)
This is https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/WP25EasterEggs/+/1228533 right? I can tag it if we'd like
Dec 23 2025
Questions:
- the event are not differentiated between add an article to the Saved or to remove?
- clicking on a saved article seems to produce only init event - is it expected?
That doesn't feel right - let's follow up on this in the new year
Dec 22 2025
Adding our team so we can move this across our workboard! Let me know if it is bothering you 🫶
Dec 12 2025
- Correct, this is fine - approved translations take priority, although I think we noted that they're a bit long
- @PBradley-WMF @LMora-WMF do you mind confirming this is okay? My recollection is that we said we're not doing anything with the sidebar this month, but perhaps I made that up
- If I'm not mistaken, the URL for all pages should be to Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Wikimedia_Foundation_Legal_and_Safety_Contact_Information, which would resolve to the correct non-English language version if one is available
Dec 9 2025
Approved and moving to QA
Dec 8 2025
Steph and/or Jan to reach out shortly - we would ideally work on this immediately as it's impacting visually impaired users in a big way
Sorry micromanaging - this seems reasonable
Loren to review my no code
Steph did this - will find someone to make sure I did it right
Dec 5 2025
A bit unofficial, but posted in the project channel (https://wikimedia.slack.com/archives/C092G2CFB43/p1764952320563829) so that portion is ready for signoff
Dec 4 2025
Dec 2 2025
^ different deployment, but we can probably leave this in signoff instead of moving it and then moving it back in two hours
Nov 25 2025
@aude to backport on Tuesday, December 2nd (with @LMora-WMF and potentially @Volker_E shadowing)
Nov 20 2025
Adding to the sprint since it got merged
Heroes, thank you!
Nov 18 2025
Loren told me the role="region" issue is not a problem, and I was able to confirm the aria live region is now present, so this can be signed off!! It's THREE (3) minutes past 5 so I am setting a bad example by still being online 😔 apologies team
Done and QAed and backported - to be tested in prod whenever T409650 gets picked up, but signing off as we're pretty confident with this one
Looks good - only one failure and it's the infamous 5 items grid



