@Aklapper I visited this page yesterday to lodge an objection but this further discussion and suggestion were already here. A discussion has been initiated on hiwiki Village Pump and soon the conversation results shall be presented after the due process.

@TheresNoTime @Superpes15 It has been over a month. If this means denial then should I open a fresh discussion for "autopatrolled" usergroup and "only autopatrolled" protection level?

@TheresNoTime, I am sorry that it appears to be "motivated by the desire to copy bigger projects" but that is not the case. This IS a small wiki and very few users are active here; where such page move vandalism or pure machine translations may remain unsupervised/undone for a very long time as these can be easily missed by global monitoring team. That's why we need some protection mechanism. Hope, you will understand.

Same problem is with Content Translation tool which has been misused to create totally machine translated articles in indiscriminate manner without further manual improvements to those articles.

@TheresNoTime, Thanks for your comment. Some recent page moves i.e. to change numerals or just indiscriminate moves to imply an obsolete script for Bhojpuri language here are a few examples (not all to mention) have prompted us to move for such a provisions/request. We cannot protect all such pages to sysop level up to move protection where pages are being targeted in indiscriminate manner. Current protection levels are only autoconfirmed (easily gained automatically) and sysop level. We need an intermediate level (and without local sysop intervention) for which automatically granted extended confirmed would be more appreciable rather than autopatrolled (for which sysop handling will be necessary).

We are open to the inputs. It would be good to have opinions of more experienced persons.

Hello @Superpes15, thanks for such a swift response. To the best of my knowledge "autopatrolled" rights are primarily for checking user contributions, i.e. either new page creations or edits (where flaged reiview system is enabled). Since flagged review is not enabled on bhwiki, we have to review only new page creations. This is not much a gruelling task on bhwiki. That is why we opted for "extended confirmed" group because our purpose is not primarily concerned with patrolling pages.

@MarcoAurelio Thanks!

In T160423#4149372, @Urbanecm wrote:

Community consensus seems to be reached.

@Urbanecm Thanks for your quick response and valuable suggestions. I will communicate these to the community. For the time being, let's proceed with the present consensus and request.

Is there anybody claiming this task? We are waiting! Regards.

It is working fine. Thanks a lot to all of you.

I started using Windows 10 about a month ago and faced this problem. In this meantime, just got my old Windows 7 system repaired and when I tried on that, it worked well. Then a user suggested me to check for fonts. I copied all the fonts (which come with Windows 7 and are missing in Windows 10) to my new laptop. Now, this problem is solved.

Hi, I am facing this same problem for Devnagari Script, I use AWB on bhwiki, hiwiki, and maiwiki. Somebody do something, please!

@MarcoAurelio Thanks !

@Ladsgroup ! Thanks for your kind response! All we need is to get a list of articles from a choosen category and display that list on a project page. Number of such categories is about 20 from which we have to get such lists (one from each category) and maximum number of articles to be listed at an istant would not exceed 100. Also, we need to sort this list by creation date or by the date it was added to the category.

I am aware that it is basically used by wikinews but the reason behind this request is that we don't have any other alternatives. And we are not a large wiki!? I also believe, it is the number and kind of lists created using this extension which will decide how much load it exerts on the database.

Anything happening regarding this task??

Is anything happening regarding this task?

ok @revi !I will do that in the same way.

I am sorry for inconveniance but I want to take this request back. I will request in the Internationalization group. But there is one more discussion which has just started at local community page about this list. I have to finalize that first.

I am sorry for inconveniance but I want to take this request back. I will request in the Internationalization group. But there is one more discussion which has just started at local community page about this list. I have to finalize that first.

I have provided the link to the list of changes to be made. If necessary, I will copy and paste it here too.

I am temp admin on bhwiki. I list here some old discussions (I never participated, I am still not much technical to understand these things):

Ok then. You people can take the final decision whether to install it or not.

thanks ! its working ! I am greatfull to you! --Satyam Mishra

I used this on hindi wiki when I was reviewer there and still use it as an admin. I feel cofortable with it. But on bh.wiki it is difficult to track changes as annon edits dont show any red flag!

thanks Kartik ji!

Yes Sir! without it will be of no worth because we are yet a small wiki and most of the people come here from another wikis. Very few people directly create acconts here.

Ji ! I am not sure How it works. I followed the instruction on meta wiki configuration change request. Plese help!