I've created the document at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E2UERKWEaXhHZsax9_OBeukudxUmjuRKuDgabWX3_4k.

I'm in favour of adding the columns. If we find that it would be better to have them as subprojects, that should be easily done through bulk edits.

Both meetings mentioned in the description are now in the calendar.

Is this about the job opening that has now been filled?

The Piwik module was disabled during last Drupal update, see T207354#4677368.

• Updated Drupal core to 7.60
• Disabled piwik module
• Updated libraries module to 7.x-2.5

In T151877#4666290, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

In T151877#4657965, @HannaLindgren wrote:

@Sebastian_Berlin-WMSE will test installing this on his machine to make sure it doesn't just work for me. If it works for him as well I'd consider this task resolved.

I've created the subpages for the projects. I used the tables for logs since there was a majority in favour (2 to 1 :)) and that meant I didn't have to rewrite the log intro.

I still think that it's likely that log entries are related to tasks even if it may not always be a one to one relationship. When that's not the case, you can always leave that column empty.

I added the text for the second project to the same page and did some minor adjustments.

In T206758#4661600, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

I'm missing the link to the Phabricator board (I would naturally expect to find it somewhere early on).

I added the link to the Phab-project in the first paragraph.

Draft for one of the project is up on https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Sebastian_Berlin_(WMSE)/sandl%C3%A5da. I added some mockup things for the log to show how it could look. I also moved around some of the text a bit, but I think everything from the meeting document should be included.

I made a UML use case diagram and added it to M263. I'm not sure if the use cases associated with storage (Lagring) makes sense or if that should really be an actor. Those use cases wouldn't be in the application anyway, since it specifies use cases for the target groups.

Is idea to still have put things that don't fall under these categories in WMSE?

I changed to use only one mock containing all the flow charts (M263), to not have to create so many mocks.

Annotating a recording: M266.

In T205854#4657610, @Lokal_Profil wrote:

It looks good. do the colours have any particular meaning (backend/browser/TTS-service?

First version up: M265. STTS are working on the TTS-server diagram and I will incorporate that when I get it. @Lokal_Profil, could you take a look and see if anything is odd?

Created one for reviewing a recording: M264.

Created one for recording a sentence: M263. I assumed it should be in Swedish, but can change to English if that's preferable.

I've started on a document https://nextcloud.wikimedia.se/index.php/f/18509.

In T197242#4638029, @mobrovac wrote:

Also, the current idea is to start using the upstream translators directly, so I would suggest submitting your changes to the Zotero translators repository directly.

What remains is to update instructions on our wiki for how to connect to a meeting and add to an information bullet for the next week meeting.

I have created an organizational unit for the videoconference account to limit what apps it has access to. I turned off as much as possible except for Hangouts, which Meet is apparently part of, and Calendar, which is needed to get invited to meetings.

Blocked by T197242: Transition citoid to use Zotero's translation-server-v2.

I've created an account (videoconference@wikimedia.se). It's not part of the office team, so it doesn't have access to any of our drive files, which is good.

There are more functions that could be presented as mockups. These will have to be identified from the list of target groups.

From my initial read through: