see https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shizhao/T154237

==== On usefulness
How many tasks could be tagged now with this? If it is just a couple of them I'd not bother in creating a project.

In T171927#3546816, @Mrjohncummings wrote:

There is a list of Chinese heritage produced by the government here that could be used http://www.sach.gov.cn/col/col1644/index.html

Does this seem to be an issue with the OTRS system?

In T133410#3436066, @Tgr wrote:

I believe templates in Flow comments/summaries would be broken in both edit and read mode. But then, complex templates are almost never used in those places anyway.

In T172163#3540360, @Liuxinyu970226 wrote:

Err is this group still active? https://cn.wikimedia.org/ shows activity up to Oct 2015...

zhwiki, commons,metawiki..... same problem.

In T172379#3514125, @Nuria wrote:

I doubt the feed algorithm considers pageviews when removing a page and very likely pages that show up a lot (over and over) regardless of traffic will not get displayed.

Now, that being said the "wiki" article has a lot of bot traffic not identified as such, this user agent below is responsible for a lot of pageviews (~60.000) on August 1st.

{"browser_major":"9","os_family":"Windows 7","os_major":"-","device_family":"Other","browser_family":"IE","os_minor":"-","wmf_app_version":"-"}

In T172379#3511401, @Liuxinyu970226 wrote:

@Shizhao I can only reply one question for now

Why just source 2 lacks data of #1 and #2, and all other data is the same?

T172379#3509744 from nuria

• source 1: https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/metrics/pageviews/top/zh.wikipedia/all-access/2017/08/01
• source 2: https://zh.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/feed/featured/2017/08/02
• source 3: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=zh.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-10&pages={{article name}} (only user data from 20170801, not included bot and spider)

Also @Shizhao your comments are still foggy, at least

It removes pages where we think the traffic is bot-inflated.

only user data

Haven't you seen T172379#3510994? there's at least Antigng-bot and InternetArchiveBot available and you say those are "only user data"?!

@Liuxinyu970226 I mean same data of the same day, but lacks data of "Wiki" and "維基媒體基金會".

@Liuxinyu970226 The views data of the same article is the same in same day, but one of the sources lacks data of "Wiki" and "維基媒體基金會".

In T172379#3502782, @bearND wrote:

MCS does some filtering.

• It removes the main page since that would always be the same.

"Wiki" and "維基媒體基金會" not main page

• It removes pages that are not in the main-namespace. (We mainly want to get rid of Special pages. One could argue that Category pages might be OK. That might be up for discussion.)

"Wiki" and "維基媒體基金會" is main-namespace

• It removes pages where we think the traffic is bot-inflated.

only user data

Also I should mention that MCS responds with the previous days data. So, you'd want to compare https://zh.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/feed/featured/2017/08/02 with https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/metrics/pageviews/top/zh.wikipedia/all-access/2017/08/01. That is because it's part of the feed data calculated on 2017/08/02. At that time (shortly after 00:00 UTC) it only knows what the top pages of the previous days were. It cannot predict the current day's top viewed articles.

In T172379#3497560, @elukey wrote:

Because they are different APIs showing different content :)

Please re-open if you need more info (or just follow up in the #wikimedia-analytics IRC channel)

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A8%A1%E5%9D%97:CGroup/IT , just 126kB, no highlighting