@Ladsgroup: sure. Try https://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orlando_Gibbons&action=protect

@Aklapper: the community has consented to implement this. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Warung_Kopi_(Teknis)#Mengizinkan_para_peninjau_meninjau

Thank you, much appreciated!

@Ladsgroup I've talked to a few, and it seems that no idwiki crat is comfortable with using the bot for user right assignment. Would you consider doing it, if you're not too busy?

Pinging Indonesian crats: @Meursault2004 @Rachmat04 @RaymondSutanto @Arifin.wijaya

@Ladsgroup hi, could you take a look at this? Thanks!

In T268317#7219225, @Ladsgroup wrote:

no it wasn't part of this change.

In T268317#7214799, @Ladsgroup wrote:

In T268317#7212093, @SpartacksCompatriot wrote:

Would it be possible to automatically give Reviewer right to all users that currently has Editor right in this change, since the protected mode would render the Editor status obsolete anyway?

That would be rather complex but not too much. I deploy the change and let us know if there is a problem.

This would look like something that needs community approval first. I'll start a thread on the village pump and get back to you with what the community decided. Thanks a lot again, @Ladsgroup!

Works now. Thanks a lot! https://id.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Istimewa:Catatan&logid=16049978

Still doesn't work for the moment.

@Ladsgroup seems like sysops has not been able to designate Pending Changes upon articles. Is there any problem?

@Ladsgroup thank you very much!

@Ladsgroup I don't think so. idwiki already have a Reviewer user right, which roughly has the same rights with the Pending Changes Reviewer right at enwiki.

@Ladsgroup exactly as T121995, yes.

@Urbanecm @Ladsgroup I've renamed and updated the task, as requested.

@Aklapper yes, that would make sense. Does the Extended-Confirmed protection came with it or it needs a separate task?

@Urbanecm the 2017 consensus was achieved to apply just the Pending Changes protection (as it was applied currently at enwiki), and to apply the 30/500 Extended-Confirmed protection.

@Urbanecm @Peachey88 community approval aside (which has been achieved at least once), what really is the technical issue of replacing FlaggedRevs?

I don't think a new RfC is needed in this one. The 2017 RfC was quite clear about replacing FlagRev with pending changes.

In T228745#6707963, @Exec8 wrote:

I would agree that a simple domain wmincubator.org is best way forward. My suggestion is <lang_code>-<project_code>.wmincubator.org. For example: hil-wp.wmincubator.org or pag-wt.wmincubator.org. Once done, I can work on infoboxes, tables and charts extracted/ queried from wikidata. This also make capacity building & outreach activities easier with one standard process. Under the current environment, you have to teach new users about prefixes (links, categories, creation of new pages, etc) and then teach them again editing without prefixes once the project is hatched/ graduated from the incubator.

The new ones would do fine.

Yeah it was edited manually. Thanks, @tomasz.