In T244847#9700468, @Spinster wrote:

After hearing reconciliation service (re)users, hearing emerging ideas, and seeing the reality of the Wikimedia movement's capacities, I decided to also create this ticket: T362149: Alternative, affordable, lower-barrier approach(es) to reconciliation

I am wondering if the Wikidata:Embedding Project can play some role here?

We discussed this task at the GLAM Wiki conference in Lisbon. It would be extremely useful to have this enable to encourage good checks by uploaders, enhancing the quality of contributions to our platforms.

Hello @RKemper ! Tagging you but feel free to tag someone else; I'm bringing this task to the attention as it's a new one, but it perhaps may have slipped under the radar because it's a subtask of another (finished) one...

Via a deprecated (?) documentation page I found instructions to create requests via Phabricator like this: T398820: Add RKD to WDQS allowlist (this is a real request)

I'm removing myself as assignee. I have worked on this a bit but don't realistically have the capacity to continue pulling the cart here and want to give the floor for others to accomplish great things! It's a valuable thing to work on, as it will make images and data on Wikimedia Commons so much more usable to the world at large.

I'm removing myself as assignee and am tagging this task as Stalled. I haven't had the capacity to follow SDC-related community documentation in detail and don't know if this has been further done, finished, or not. The page I started that was mentioned above hasn't been added to or linked to by anyone else, and so I think it's eventually best to either remove or redirect it. (I do think it's pretty useful, but if others are not working on this, it may not be as useful as I think it is.)

I'm removing myself as assignee. I have worked on this a bit but don't realistically have the capacity to continue pulling the cart here and want to give the floor for others to help accomplish great things! It's an extremely valuable thing to work on, as it will make images and data on Wikimedia Commons so much more usable to the world at large.

I'm removing myself as assignee. I have worked on this a bit but don't realistically have the capacity to continue pulling the cart here and want to give the floor for others to accomplish great things! It's a valuable thing to work on, as it will make images and data on Wikimedia Commons so much more usable to the world at large.

I'm removing myself as assignee. I automatically assigned myself when creating this task but it's really one for community contribution! It's a valuable thing to work on, as it will make images and data on Wikimedia Commons so much more usable to the world at large.

I'm removing myself as assignee. I automatically assigned myself when creating this task but it's really one for community contribution! It's a valuable thing to work on, as it will make biodiversity data on Wikimedia Commons so much more usable to the world at large.

I'm removing myself as assignee. I automatically assigned myself when creating this task but it's really one for community contribution! It's a valuable thing to work on, as it will make musical data on Wikimedia Commons so much more usable to the world at large.

I can't speak for the project itself, but I am following the Biodiversity Heritage Library's efforts to add reliable structured data about depicted species to illustrations on Wikimedia Commons. The Smithsonian has recently invested in @TiagoLubiana as a Wikimedian in Residence and @Ambrosia10 is also doing a lot of effort on it in her own time.

In T380737#10353018, @rook wrote:

@Spinster any thoughts on this?

Not sure if this is the same issue, but since several weeks I get automatically logged out of all Wikimedia projects every day, sometimes several times per day. I tried in different browsers, cleared cookies and browser settings, hasn't helped me. User:Spinster

There is some movement on this, thanks to a comment in the SDC Telegram group.

Connecting this task to T362149: Alternative, affordable, lower-barrier approach(es) to reconciliation. Reconciliation will be a key part of this effort and this will be a great opportunity to have impact by researching more flexible and affordable approaches to that functionality.

Ticket created after a discussion in the GLAM-Wiki Global Telegram group.

After hearing reconciliation service (re)users, hearing emerging ideas, and seeing the reality of the Wikimedia movement's capacities, I decided to also create this ticket: T362149: Alternative, affordable, lower-barrier approach(es) to reconciliation

(Repost from meta:Talk:Artificial_intelligence/Bellagio_2024)

Works perfectly fine for me in my own PAWS installation by the way.

I referred to this ticket here https://github.com/OpenRefine/CommonsExtension/issues/99

In T337023#9425675, @Jarekt wrote:

I can revisit the Module:License code and work on supporting more cases. If someone wants to help I could use a tester adding cases to Module:License/doc cataloging cases where current code gave adequate result and when it did not

A main issue to make this work in a clear way: the different layers of authorship, dates and copyright in such files.

Update: apparently there is a template {{License from structured data}} started by @Jarekt in 2021 (?) which has the basics for this.

Oops, duplicate of T352865 which I had failed to find here!

This task was not done during the hackathon, but still very valid!

Showing the structured data by default (not in a separate tab) would IMO very much help with its broader adoption.

It would be very helpful to find some examples of files to try to model. Digitized recordings of older but notable songs? Maybe members of Wikidata-WikiProject-Music have suggestions?

Getting started here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/Modeling/Works_without_Wikidata_item

Related:

• T326244: Investigate using Search API Facets from ElasticSearch
• T251573: (Tool idea) Build a prototype / proof of concept faceted search for Structured Data on Commons (I also created that ticket a few years ago but I am certainly thinking I want more than prototyping and more than an external tool)

Also mentioned this ticket on the general SDC talk page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Structured_data#Faceted,_SDC-powered_MediaSearch_for_Wikimedia_Commons

I created a high-level task so that community and stakeholders can weigh in on the general topic of faceted search for Commons. T337106: Faceted, structured data-based MediaSearch on Wikimedia Commons

Created overarching task for faceted search. I would really like to see that implemented and it would be great to get a conversation going: T337106: Faceted, structured data-based MediaSearch on Wikimedia Commons

In T335910#8864538, @Susannaanas wrote:

• Most of the media files are about creative works without a Wikidata item.

I have started here - the page can of course be moved and named differently. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/Minimalist_Wikitext_information_templates

I plan to work on this project at the Wikimedia-Hackathon-2023 and it seems relevant here: T335910: Improve Structured Data on Commons data models (and their documentation) as a basis for Lua Infobox templates

In T244847#8502964, @Pintoch wrote:

Here is the current status of this issue:

The team at TIB (headed by @Loz.ross) is now maintaining the current wrapper and has contributed improvements to deploy it on other Wikibase instances:
https://gitlab.com/nfdi4culture/ta1-data-enrichment/openrefine-wikibase
Thank you to them!

Hi @Spinster ! We can certainly at least investigate if we will be able to get the extension installed! Could you open a dedicated ticket for that? With any details on what you see as making it tricky to get into PAWS?

Yay, it's amazing that you spotted the version update. Thank you for filing this :D

Yay! So many kudos to everyone who helps with the PAWS version of OpenRefine! 😁

Is this task still valid? Does it make sense to do "other OpenRefine cloud Wikimedia things" besides the PAWS installation?

We haven't had action on this topic for a while, so changing status. I think it's still relevant?

Thanks for reporting this! I recently did the steps above using OpenRefine 3.7 beta2, and the problem persists.