In T405230#11378910, @Samwalton9-WMF wrote:

@Superzerocool Am I right in thinking that this user is looking for a clarification on the 19th November date?

In T405230#11359641, @Samwalton9-WMF wrote:

@Superzerocool @Nemoralis @BAPerdana-WMF Thank you so much! I've just updated my original message to replace [DATE] with Wednesday, November 19th, could you do the same for your messages? Much appreciated.

In T405230#11340880, @Samwalton9-WMF wrote:

@BAPerdana-WMF @Venuslui @Dogu @Superzerocool @Yahya @Nemoralis Hi all! We are ready to deploy an update to Automoderator that will enable you to optionally select a new (hopefully better) machine learning model to power its reverts. Unfortunately, this will cause Automoderator to turn off when the configuration is deployed, requiring you to reconfigure it. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.

Could you help me by translating the above text, ready to post on your wiki's relevant noticeboards, so that the community is aware? We haven't set the date in stone yet - I want to wait to hear back from you first, but I think ideally we would schedule this for next week or the week after. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks, I've commented on the Spanish Wikipedia community.

Thanks @Aklapper... s any date estimated to be fixed in production? (next week or just few hours?)

Hello, I activated Automoderator on Spanish Wikipedia on Saturday morning, and it began to revert vandalism. I used this configuration to start the tests, and it found around 100 edits/day to revert, which seems too low compared to SeroBOT, but it could be the use of a conservative option. I will follow the tests for some days and try to compare some situations about SeroBOT and Automoderator. Just to ask, which model is using Automoderador?

Here is the message to the Community about activation. Next Monday (May 26) will be the first day.

Oh God, 12 days later, but we have an Automoderator page 🎉... @Trizek-WMF, are all Community tasks done?

@Trizek-WMF sure, I can make it possible with your ideas :). I'll ping you when the pages are created.

@Trizek-WMF hi again, please check if all strings are translated in translatewiki.

In T391248#10795661, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

@Superzerocool, the Moderator tools team plans to work on the deployment very soon. However, we are still missing a few elements from the Community side, listed in the task description:

• 8 interface translations are still missing
• Automoderador user page (it can be created even if the page says 'the account is not registered")
• Automoderador fase positives report page (can be a sub-page of Usuario:Automoderador)

Thank you! :)

In T389445#10675289, @Bachounda wrote:

@Superzerocool I see an edit conflict—let me know when you’re done. :)

Hi, I added some templates and policies from Spanish Wikipedia. Do we need to add a policy (if it is available) about non-sexist language?. I'll ask some power users about jargon in edit summaries.

For that one, you have to create https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Group-event-organizer-member. As a general tip, you can find what message corresponds to given a string in the interface by using uselang=qqx.

Hi, before closing the ticket, how can we translate some strings such as event-organizer?

Just another note: 172.20.0.0/20 are private IPs, so, we can't create exceptions over these IPs (see more information)

The patch is done, but I'll wait until Monday to ask the deployment if there is any change or issue with the request

Hello @Ezarate, Do you know the time of the editathon? (ie: 08:00 to 14:00 UTC-4)

Hi there,

Hi @Richard_Nevell_WMUK... about your request, 8 may be a low number (it's not a requirement to be a high value), but is there any way to register before the event?

Hi @Ezarate, I see you don't provide the IP to be lifted. You could read https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mass_account_creation#Requesting_temporary_lift_of_IP_cap about requirements to lift an IP

Done per this commit, the writer is adding a new closing table by an error in the evaluation of exception. This commit has sorted the inclusion if the test is successful or not.

Resolved per this commit, and it will improve the percentage in some tables.

Closing per this commit and the confirmation in Web2Cit/monitor

Done by this commit and checked with this diff in the monitor.

Closed per this merge. The dirs was renamed as results to result subpages and logs to logs subpages

Almost done in this comit

@Peachey88 done. Thanks for the comment. I'll write a few words in the week before starting the first tests.

Done per diff