Means? The change which was on waiting for ages got resolved automatically?

Me as enwiki account creator(acc team) and an ipblock got me. I can't change my network as that's the only network available at my location so, it's not just accounts creation, but it has stopped me from using urlshortener. And I don't know what else. No user rights are going to help me in this situation. Hopefully this ticket gets resolved soon. I am not comfortable using the acc tool for account creation but rather I prefer using it manually at special:createaccount. Thanks in advance

Thanks a lot 😊

Yeah I will note that, actually I am not a code literate but I want to help in other aspects. So few things might not reach me.
I am informing the same to community too.
Yes, we will need templateeditor protection level too. As that's what triggered me and others in the community to this ticket.
We wanted to freeze few pages/ completed books as any other source project but not at admin level. So there should be scope for few others to edit those pages too. Thanks

[[ s:mr:Special:Diff/139607 | Community opinion ]], I have informed the community about the changes in the original proposal. I hope this will not wait anymore as we have been waiting for this for the last 5 months now. thanks

Which makes the following
पेट्रोलर patroller

Mark others' edits as patrolled (patrol)
Quickly rollback the edits of the last user who edited a particular page (rollback)
View recent changes patrol marks (patrolmarks)
Not create redirects from source pages when moving pages (suppressredirect)
Confirmed (confirmed)

@Zabe , @Aklapper, I am extremely sorry for the actions. Will remember that.

I recently came across you have resolved similar task here, bangali wikitionary, I hope you will resolve this. thanks in advance

I don't understand what is the need for community confirmation again and again and how many times we need it? and delays like this, it was started four months ago. I don't know what was wrong in the processes I followed, I would be happy to know that, as I believe learning helps. But keep things pending for four months and asking again for community consensus, which means you are again buying time of one month. Basically, the delays were another way of saying NO. As per my knowledge, this was doable and it's still doable only if you want to. If I am wrong in understanding processes please enlighten me, I assure you that I will not repeat my mistakes.

Let's say it and accept that we never wanted to do this, I am really not happy with the attitude and time-consuming processes which are been forced without any reason. I hereby stop myself from writing anything on this thread, you are free to do anything with it. I am really tired and disappointed with the help I have received for this particular task and the time wasted altogether. thanks and regards.

Another gentle reminder, when are we doing it?

A gentle reminder! did we abandon the whole task? or just an account creator group? The account creator group was there, But we thing we need is, admins should be able to add/remove account creator, template editor, and patroller groups. thanks

In T270402#6745608, @Urbanecm wrote:

Done :)

In T270402#6724762, @Urbanecm wrote:

Sure. I'll do this later today.

thanks in advance

Sorry for not being aware of the processes here. But is this task being taken by someone or its just waiting for attention? Analysis is happening or not? I can't see anything more than status updates. Please let me know what we are doing with this task. Thanks in advance

In T270402#6711731, @Urbanecm wrote:

Because of deployment freeze, no changes may be made now. This will be
taken care of in January 2021, once deployments are possible again. Thank
you for the patience.

Its been one week since the community was notified and the very request is non-controversial and mere developmental, can we go ahead with this now? There would be nothing much to do without these rights and facilities to import.

Can't we just go ahead with account creator, patrollers, and template editor? (admin can add and remove!) And leave edit filter manager and importor for now.

I have been having second thoughts about importer and edit filter manager, given the security risk. But the whole purpose of this discussion and community vote was to encourage editors to take up something from admin rights and contribute. probably we can create these user rights and only stewards can grant these? But account creator, patroller, template editor can be assigned by admins locally?

We have received clear support from the community when this would be taken ahead?

In T269067#6658867, @Bugreporter wrote:

See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Limits_to_configuration_changes#Changes_that_are_likely_to_be_declined - some groups may be not necessary and users should be encouraged to request adminship instead.

Thanks for sharing those links, i would create these pages tonight, once I
reach home.

It should have been done ages ago, now every hour we add to it is late. Do you even understand what we have missed till now?
Like we need to get all of such tools on war-footage, It's been few years that such tools were introduced and we didn't get it because of certain guys, who were unwilling to democratize tools to produce wiki- itself. So Marathi wiki was made into almost inaccessible for many of Marathi folks who didn't know certain kind of Marathi.
Now I want to get all that which was stopped by them. Which includes powerful citation tools like citoid.

https://mr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE:%E0%A4%9A%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A1%E0%A5%80/%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95_%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A8#Enabling_Citoid_on_Marathi%2F%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A0%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%B0_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%9F%E0%A5%89%E0%A4%88%E0%A4%A1_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%81_%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%A3%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%80 this is the link to that disscussion thread. As expected not many are interested in it. except few.

I have posted about the same on village pump/technical issues. Let's see who comes for this task, otherwise, we will have to go ahead with whatever is possible.
thanks

I wish I knew where to start with such topics but I didn't. That's how I had posted it here, No such discussion has happened on our local Marathi wiki,
Sureshkhole

thanks all of you who supported us...workshop was conducted without any technical issues because of your efforts.