Ah, I should've checked the edit history as well — good to know for next time. Thanks, @Novem_Linguae!

Actually, I just separately remembered that I was able to mark my AfC accepts as reviewed before I had the autopatrolled user right — just had a brain fart! Thanks everyone.

Also, the Beta Cluster seems to be having server issues, and I don't have the technical rights there to try and test this anyway. Would someone else be able to help with trying to replicate the issue?

In T382759#10430626, @Novem_Linguae wrote:

I don't think there's a bug here.

Looking at the logs for the draft reveals a potential complication: the draft page was marked as patrolled about 15 minutes after the page creator moved it to mainspace, so the edit conflict (patrol conflict?) may be part of the issue.

I had almost the opposite issue this evening. My account is not autopatrolled, but when I moved the 3Breezy article from userspace to mainspace using AFCH the page was seemingly already marked as reviewed when I got there (03:41 UTC); the curation toolbar did not appear, and I could see the "Add to New Pages Feed" link in the sidebar. The log, however, has no entries for that action. I then marked it as unreviewed and reviewed again (03:53 UTC), which set everything back to normal. Courtesy ping @Soda who I was discussing this with on Discord.

I also mentioned this on mediawiki.org a couple months ago.

Also, I was mistaken earlier about using the "[Mark this page as patrolled]" button on Draft:Sophie O'Brien; that action was also carried out through Twinkle.

I have a hunch that this might be related to Twinkle marking pages as patrolled when performing other actions such as tagging, and PageTriage interpreting that patrol as a review in draftspace for whatever reason. Ctrl+F-ing for "Draft:" in my page curation log shows an entry at Draft:BVP Software with a timestamp matching when I tagged it for G11 deletion, at Draft:Mahesh Bansal matching when I tagged it with {{COI}}, and at Draft:Akg (which I can't verify since it's been deleted, but an administrator could).

Might want to start a discussion at WT:NPP to gauge how many people still use the patrol button instead of the curation toolbar. Also, can we disable the button in mainspace only? That would be the best of both worlds in terms of unlinking it from PageTriage while causing as little change as possible.

That's a bummer. I suppose this would mean the feature wouldn't be applicable to AfC reviews, but maybe it would still be beneficial to allow editors to unpatrol "their own" articles for other circumstances. As Novem Linguae mentioned at WT:AFC, this smaller change may be uncontroversial enough to not require a community discussion.

Also, I don't know if tags can be applied to review log entries, but it would be useful to have UV's log entries tagged so they can be sorted or searched.

This may be related to T263932.

Hey there! I'm not sure if this discussion is exactly the right place to bring up this issue, but it's definitely related. This might provide more context for what I'm talking about. Essentially, previews seem to have instructions to remove any text inside parentheses and replace it with a space [ ] character, and this causes an issue when there is punctuation right after the parentheses. Is this something that can be fixed in this particular situation?