Aug 9 2018
Aug 8 2018
Jul 28 2018
Apr 14 2016
@Gehel Given that this is approved by Jaime and in plan pending FDC approval do you want close it out and re-open when we finalize on hardware or do you want to keep this open?
Mar 18 2016
@mark Yes, lets move forward with this. thanks
Feb 4 2016
Feb 3 2016
Certainly not me :)
Feb 1 2016
I'd recommend reaching out to Sheree or Wes to help out with this
Jan 29 2016
This will likely fit under the strategic budget so we'll need a brief narrative about going default on Wikipedia and any other projects to explain the increase of machines.
Jan 27 2016
In my previous life managing search clusters we split our corpus by geographic location, then function (full text, prefix, etc) and then partitioned the data to fit into the nodes that we had available (P1, P2, etc). This allowed us to get much more predictable estimates for query patterns relative to year over year traffic trends. Since languages aren't bound tightly to geographic locations language becomes the next best estimate. Given that #3 is the most enticing following by #2.
Jan 26 2016
If we have lost a DC then we should not be doing maintenance on a node. Stability is key then. I'm used to running in an n+1 hardware layout where any of your DC's can fall over and the other(s) can take total traffic while running slightly hot. Then it doesn't really matter which one gets the traffic and your users are happy.
Dec 31 2015
I agree with Gabriel that having https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T113540 informal and for feedback would be best. The phab task has already been really helpful to get some of that feedback. We can think about it un-conference style.
Dec 2 2015
Interest in the following
Nov 20 2015
Data remains unchanged. Re-opening.
Nov 18 2015
Nov 3 2015
Oct 27 2015
Oct 19 2015
Oct 15 2015
Oct 8 2015
Oct 6 2015
That would be useful data to have. @Deskana, are we already tracking it elsewhere? let's avoid duplication if so
Oct 5 2015
@dr0ptp4kt: I'd like to meet this week to discuss. Can you make sure you have your team discussion before?
Oct 2 2015
Sep 24 2015
@bearND @dr0ptp4kt @BGerstle-WMF @Jdlrobson @Catrope - would love to get feedback from you guys about what improvements discovery can make to the search API to make development of products easier and faster
Sep 23 2015
Sep 22 2015
Sep 17 2015
Very happy with the updates. I've been the updated docs actively. Let's resolve.
Sep 16 2015
thank you @Dzahn
Right now were focusing our conversations using discovery@ and traffic on maps-l is really small.
@Ironholds yes, we'll need this to complete our picture of the maps pipeline.
Sep 15 2015
Let's move this to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Maps as this task is not actionable right now
Let's rename please
Sep 14 2015
Thanks @Yurik. Usually I would think about these kind of metrics being in ganglia or grafana but @MaxSem tells me that we can't connect those tools to a Varnish stream. Let's work with @Ironholds to find out what they would need in order to surface these data points. This request would cover the server side metrics and is separate from our existing client side metric KPI's. Implementing these should not block launch.
@Dzahn, let's just rename the lists so that we can keep the archives
@Dzahn, looks like you this patch set adds "tfinc" instead of "tomasz" I'd mention that in CR but gerrit is not letting me in
Checking in to see when we plan to have this live for our alpha and beta users. I know we have some design back and forth but i'm curious if we have a time that were targeting to get this out for testing. thanks
Sep 10 2015
I could see some interesting follow ups to this.
It's fine for now. We'll iterate as we learn about usage.
Sep 9 2015
@Yurik - can you move https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Maps#Production_maps_cluster to wikitech and update as needed?
Sep 8 2015
Happy to summarize
Sep 4 2015
@MaxSem @Yurik - Since both of you are going to speak with MapBox can you find out how they measure this? I'm looking for some standard industry practice. We don't want to have analyze every single zoom, pinch, etc but instead have a higher level of view of what's happening
Sep 3 2015
Sep 1 2015
I mailed Juliet at comms to give her a heads up about this. Not looking for any direct support them as we'll likely focus on-wiki and mailing lists