Fri, Nov 15
Ok! Now there's nothing special happening at euwiki and there are not new merges happening, so it should be another thing.
Last days I have been heavily merging some templates, and it may be related.
Thu, Nov 14
Wed, Nov 13
Sat, Nov 9
Mm... I don't know if I understand your point. Currently, we can take whatever we want from Wikidata, this is being used masively on many Wikimedia projects.
Tue, Nov 5
Hello again @Sebastian_Berlin-WMSE! Could I have any clue on how is this project, please?
Wed, Oct 30
How could we train this? I add @Ksarasola to this topic, maybe he has some great ideas.
If it seems solved, we can close it, of course. I only wanted to note that strange situation.
Fri, Oct 25
Oct 15 2019
A really important topic. Many languages are struggling with this, and even some existing languages can't create new projects when they have a couple of volunteers.
Thanks @TheDJ. I'm a bit lost about the topics here, but I think that this issue may be discussed at the Technical Conference.
Oct 12 2019
I'm not talking about "How to choose the best suited technical implementation (MediaWiki extensions, gadgets, "applets", etc) to provide functionality XYZ", but about "What is the path for things to be done". Imagine some kyrgyz university professor who wants to insert some interactive applets done in python at kyrgyz Wikipedia. There's not a Kyrgyz user group or even someone speaking the language at the WMF (as far as I know). What would the path be for this person?
That sounds like a very specific use case. Is there a dedicated task about this with more specific information? That task should also cover if "applet" implies "Java applet" and describe the wanted functionality in a way which allows others to potentially propose safer implementations, plus include links to previous discussions.
I don't know if this goes here, but I'd like to address one issue I thing we have to solve. Like twenty years ago I had a 3 1/4 diskette with a program to see how the planets where in the sky live, or what was the position of the moons of Jupiter right now. I could test with different times, places in the world (etc). Like ten years ago this could be a cool new feature for Wikimedia, something we could add to articles. Now is something we should have added ten years ago. But there is not a simple way to do it and every time I have tried to ask about that I find partial answers, mostly about security problems with applets.
I think this is pretty important for our movement. I have helped some newly created Wikipedias with their templates and modules and it is extremely lenghty and frustrating. They lack everything, and normally technical people is not among the wikimedians in that language. We should imagine a way in which every functionality is present (as images are in Commons) and you can override locally everything.
Oct 10 2019
The problem here is that new editors and not logged-in editors should have the visual editor for default, as the old editor is more difficult for them to understand.
Oct 8 2019
It makes sense, yes. Let's assume we have some good applets to learn physics running on python somewhere. What would be the steps to follow up so we can iframe them on any given Wikipedia?
I have finished the labelling campaing. There was a redirect in the list, so I said it was a stub, because I couldn't finish without it.
The problem is still the same: which is the correct way to implement this? We can have applets that make things interactive (for example, the position of Jupiter's moons) but for that it seems that we need some code review, isn't it? What would the correct jobqeueu be with this?
The article Lantanoide (https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lantanoide) is a good example: structurally perfect, but with lots of wrong wording.
Hello! I have some queue to start with the labelling campaign, but I will follow up as soon as possible.
I have a student who is going to do her end-of-degree research adding content on advanced physics to Wikipedia and, at the same time, creating some widgets/applets to run interactivily those physical concepts, so the viewer can see how if you change some parameter you have different results. She will be working on Python.
On our side: translating all the legal documents can be really tricky for languages that lack a legal writing standard. And it is extremely lenghty.
Oct 7 2019
You can track the error if you click there:
Sep 30 2019
As far as I see, everything seems correct.
Sep 27 2019
It seems that they are loading all the administrative division of any territory using Wikidata instead of fixed templates:
Hello, sorry for the delay.
Sep 26 2019
What should the difference be?
I have redirected it. If it is supposed to be another link, I can figure out something.
Sep 24 2019
Hello! Is there any chance that this will be deployed? Maybe we can start some test on euwiki, if there is appetite for change.
Hello! Do we have any news about this? Thanks!
Can we close this issue?
Is this live?
"Iritsi berrien ongi etorri inkestaren pribatutasun adierazpena"
Sep 19 2019
Translated, I think!
Sep 17 2019
It will be quite strange, but yes, scientifically is better to have an A/B test. How long will it take the A/B test?
I don't know how long it can take for you to deploy this. We are ready to start with this as soon as possible, as we would like to start the course for students with the implementation.
Sep 16 2019
@MMiller_WMF is anything missing? We have translated everything, AFAIK. Next week we will start with students' activity and it would be great to have this deployed.
Sep 11 2019
Sep 10 2019
All the lexemes have been uploaded. We can start now thinking on new projects to do with this.
It makes sense. I have answered also in the other thread, as I thought that it was the opposite.
Ez dute erantzun, hainbat modutan kontaktatu arren.
I think that 2 is not sensitive at all, I filled it when I thought you were asking just the opposite.
Sep 5 2019
Do we have any news on this? Thanks!
I think that this is solved, isn't it?
About the namespaces, I don't really get what you are asking for, so I think that your feedback here is the best option. If we had to exclude mainspace, then Txikipedia should be excluded. If we have to include one, also the other.
Privacy statement can be found here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lankide:Theklan/Proba_orria&oldid=7052601
- I can't see the non-translated part. We have translated everything that was translatable.
- Don't get what we have to fill there. I willed the namespaces to be monitored... @Trizek-WMF?
- Can you give me an example of what the "homepage tutorial title" is, please?
Sep 4 2019
I have cleared the cache many times and nothing. Even with your example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Synemosyna_formica
Sep 3 2019
I would suggest the system we have on euwiki (copied from cawiki). It can be deployed in a couple of hours and works perfectly.
The code used was added to common.js
The upload is happening now and will go on in the next days. Now we are the language with most senses and forms.
Sep 2 2019
- Yes, it should be Wikipedia:Txokoa
- Yes, it is here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laguntza:Sarrera
- Yes, I misunderstood the idea. It should be displayed (also) on Articles, Txikipedia and maybe on User namespace, that would be the first landing place.
If that happens we can change it in the future, isn't it?
Ok... we don't have a "Help desk" as it is now. We have a Village pump and we use Topics, so everything is archived automatically. If it is completely necessary we can create something like Laguntza:Hasiberriak and have it use structured discussion too.
Lehen pausoa eginda, arkeologia ondarearen zerrenda eskatu diet.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I can't get it working.
Hello! Is there any news on this?
Solved. The optional one hasn't been translated. If it changes to mandatory, we should take a look to that in the future.
What does exactly "Explain how your Help desk is archived =" mean?
Missing descriptions are on their way and will be soon there.
We had some recommendations on the report. Please @Edagit, finish them so we can close this issue.
Aug 28 2019
2019 abu. 28 7:34 PM erabiltzaileak hau idatzi du (nettrom_WMF <email@example.com>):
nettrom_WMF added a comment.
I went back and looked through the measurement plan in order to see what we proposed there and what discussions we had around these measurements. The three questions in the task description appear to be all of them. One thing that isn't captured above is the note that the first question is our proxy for "time on page", which we use in placement of a ping-based approach to learn how long users stay on the page. The concern was that users left the Homepage too quickly, as reflected in our leading indicators (where we found that they don't).
Another thing that isn't mentioned is the discussion around using hovers for measuring time on page in the measurement plan. One comment in that discussion mentions that we should primarily rely on click-through data, and have the hovers as a backup. So my first question about this analysis is whether we're seeing something in the click data that we're reporting that suggests that we're concerned about how specific modules are performing?
If we are concerned, what modules are we concerned about, and how will the design of the Homepage change depending on what the findings of this analysis are?
Cc: Aklapper, JTannerWMF, RHo, Trizek-WMF, nettrom_WMF, Catrope, kostajh, SBisson, Etonkovidova, kaldari, marcella, DannyH, ppelberg, Cntlsn, leila, Theklan, MMiller_WMF, Urbanecm, Taiwania_Justo