Wed, Sep 11
Tue, Sep 10
All the lexemes have been uploaded. We can start now thinking on new projects to do with this.
It makes sense. I have answered also in the other thread, as I thought that it was the opposite.
Ez dute erantzun, hainbat modutan kontaktatu arren.
I think that 2 is not sensitive at all, I filled it when I thought you were asking just the opposite.
Thu, Sep 5
Do we have any news on this? Thanks!
I think that this is solved, isn't it?
About the namespaces, I don't really get what you are asking for, so I think that your feedback here is the best option. If we had to exclude mainspace, then Txikipedia should be excluded. If we have to include one, also the other.
Privacy statement can be found here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lankide:Theklan/Proba_orria&oldid=7052601
- I can't see the non-translated part. We have translated everything that was translatable.
- Don't get what we have to fill there. I willed the namespaces to be monitored... @Trizek-WMF?
- Can you give me an example of what the "homepage tutorial title" is, please?
Wed, Sep 4
I have cleared the cache many times and nothing. Even with your example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Synemosyna_formica
Tue, Sep 3
I would suggest the system we have on euwiki (copied from cawiki). It can be deployed in a couple of hours and works perfectly.
The code used was added to common.js
The upload is happening now and will go on in the next days. Now we are the language with most senses and forms.
Mon, Sep 2
- Yes, it should be Wikipedia:Txokoa
- Yes, it is here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laguntza:Sarrera
- Yes, I misunderstood the idea. It should be displayed (also) on Articles, Txikipedia and maybe on User namespace, that would be the first landing place.
If that happens we can change it in the future, isn't it?
Ok... we don't have a "Help desk" as it is now. We have a Village pump and we use Topics, so everything is archived automatically. If it is completely necessary we can create something like Laguntza:Hasiberriak and have it use structured discussion too.
Lehen pausoa eginda, arkeologia ondarearen zerrenda eskatu diet.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I can't get it working.
Hello! Is there any news on this?
Solved. The optional one hasn't been translated. If it changes to mandatory, we should take a look to that in the future.
What does exactly "Explain how your Help desk is archived =" mean?
Missing descriptions are on their way and will be soon there.
We had some recommendations on the report. Please @Edagit, finish them so we can close this issue.
Wed, Aug 28
2019 abu. 28 7:34 PM erabiltzaileak hau idatzi du (nettrom_WMF <firstname.lastname@example.org>):
nettrom_WMF added a comment.
I went back and looked through the measurement plan in order to see what we proposed there and what discussions we had around these measurements. The three questions in the task description appear to be all of them. One thing that isn't captured above is the note that the first question is our proxy for "time on page", which we use in placement of a ping-based approach to learn how long users stay on the page. The concern was that users left the Homepage too quickly, as reflected in our leading indicators (where we found that they don't).
Another thing that isn't mentioned is the discussion around using hovers for measuring time on page in the measurement plan. One comment in that discussion mentions that we should primarily rely on click-through data, and have the hovers as a backup. So my first question about this analysis is whether we're seeing something in the click data that we're reporting that suggests that we're concerned about how specific modules are performing?
If we are concerned, what modules are we concerned about, and how will the design of the Homepage change depending on what the findings of this analysis are?
Cc: Aklapper, JTannerWMF, RHo, Trizek-WMF, nettrom_WMF, Catrope, kostajh, SBisson, Etonkovidova, kaldari, marcella, DannyH, ppelberg, Cntlsn, leila, Theklan, MMiller_WMF, Urbanecm, Taiwania_Justo
Aug 11 2019
Jul 15 2019
Jul 12 2019
This is still happening.
Jun 28 2019
We have a bunch of words and forms uploaded in Basque, they should be at least 5.000, and as euwikt is quite dead, this could be a good boost to the project.
Hello @Trizek-WMF! We need some help with this issue: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat#Allowing_Bakun_Itzulpenak_translating_pages_at_Meta
Jun 27 2019
Jun 17 2019
Could I have some news on this, please?
could I go ahead with this. I have some time allocated for it in the next days. Thanks!
Jun 13 2019
As far as we know, there isn't a way to revert a topic (i. e. because of spam) without deleting it.
But reverting a message on a topic shouldn't be understood as deleting a page.
Sorry. The issue is here: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic:V0bvaesa112xgnbp
Jun 11 2019
Jun 10 2019
Posted two times (we changed the Village pump system while discussint) and found no opposition: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topic:V0owhrrulfvf44ay
Jun 8 2019
Have you tried to do it without logging in or being a new editor? Without logging it, it points to wikitext editor.
I see the subtask resolved but it seems tha the red links still point to the wikieditor in euwiki. Is it a different issue?
Jun 6 2019
Ikasleek hainbat lan igo dituzte Txikipediara, bideoak barne. Egon dira ikasle batzuk proba orrian utzi dutenak eta ni ibili naiz horiek sartzen. Egia esan azkenean lan bera izango litzateke formato kontuak konpontzea. Bideo batzuekin arazoak, betiko moduan, Commonsen. Kasu honetan ere fundamentorik gabe. Bideoen edizioa oso txarra izan da, orokorrean. Ikasleek bideoak egingo badituzte, euren kabuz, orrialdetxo bat behar dute tresnak erabiltzeko eta kalitaterik ez galtzeko.
Jun 5 2019
I have opened it and the first one is a diff of one letter in an article. What should I do with that?
That sounds great!
I think that "Article quality version 2" is not bad... currently I don't think we need something more catchy, as this is a private task!
Jun 4 2019
I'm currently building some statistics on the ORES assesments to our project article list and I'm seing that the Start-C-B part is quite inconsistent. We can have a start article with 5.7 points and a C with 4.9... even we can have a good article with 5.9.
This is still happening.
Jun 3 2019
Waiting for WMF to accept the report.
Final budget and report sent!
Tokikomek proposamen bat bidali du, proba piloto gisa uztailean Aiurri aldizkariaren artxiboa digitalizatzeko. Tokikomek langile bat jarriko luke (praktiketan) eta gu arduratuko ginateke lan hori ordaintzeaz eta formazioa emateaz. 1985tik aurrerako artxiboa digitalizatu, antolatu eta Commonsera igoko litzateke, wikiproiektu baten barruan.
Jaso ditut aurtengo artikuluak. Batzuk oso ondo daude, beste batzuk oso eskasak (ohikoa den moduan). Proposatu genien artikulu eroak egitea, baina ahalik eta modu serioenean: erreferentziak zer diren eta nola erabili zen gakoa.
Saiatu gara Lazkaon proiektu bat garatzen, baina ikasle bakarrak eman du izena. Beraz ez da egingo eta beste modu batez antolatuko beharko dugu ikasleen parte-hartzea. Irakasleen aldetik indar gehiago egin beharko da.
Ikastaro interesgarria, ea fruituak ematen dituen hurrengo urtean.
Beste irakasle batekin egon nintzen aurrekoan, Wikipediak nola futnzionatzen duen azalduz. Badirudi hurrengo urtean aukera egon daitekeela bi departamentu batzeko proiektura.