Jun 11 2018
Mar 28 2018
I just want to be clear that we need to understand the relationship between the load times and how much people use the site. (PVs/UDs) -- it helps us understand how people use the site and the boundaries of how much speed contributes to usage.
Dec 4 2017
what if this fix was in the eventLogging code itself?
We gotta figure this out - this error needs to fail sooner than hive!
This really should be addressed in the schema validation for event logging.
Is this possible?
Aug 6 2017
Can we please rerun the usage numbers across all of the wikis using Matmarex's technique above. I don't really feel like we have consistent usage numbers.
Jun 16 2017
Folks -- this is for a high priority, community visible project (ACTRIAL) -- we really need this data. How can I help move this forward?
May 23 2017
May 14 2017
A quick review of Dan's data shows that articles created by autoconfirmed users are definitely deleted at about a 30-40% rate.
May 13 2017
Thank you everyone for the hard work!
May 10 2017
Thanks Neil -- there is some urgency. Please do an initial estimate of time
and we can get some help if need be if this will go past Friday.
May 9 2017
Just to capture Kaldari, Danny and my discussion on this -- we actually need to know how many deleted articles were created by autoconfirmed users.
Jan 24 2017
The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
Jan 23 2017
omg -- it works and it's wonderful. Thanks all!
Jan 5 2017
We had the meeting and have a good understanding of the issue. There are some technical issues regarding keeping the UX the same as the GET version so we're going to have to assess the tradeoffs around different implementations. We'll keep the ticket updated.
Jan 4 2017
yes -- today!
Jan 2 2017
[Comments by @TheDJ on the original thread]
Dec 14 2016
I will set up a meeting with designers and move this forward.
Sep 29 2016
Bumping this -- any ideas of when/if this needs to happen?
Aug 26 2016
Please work with discovery on methods - assessing lists of ranked results
is what they do.
Aug 24 2016
Don't know how useful this will be but Discovery has a tool that can be used for humans to test search results:
Jul 15 2016
Yes but maybe not to DR. It's relevant to finding a scaling factor for
unique devices to estimate a correspondence to actual people.
Jun 23 2016
Hi Folks -- this task lines up with work reading is doing with Comms on metrics. I'd like these efforts to be aligned as they are critical to the how the Reading team measures and communicates its impact.
Jun 22 2016
May 4 2016
It's not the money per se - it's just a budget formality of putting the
money in the right bucket.
May 3 2016
@kaldari Are we still considering google? Was there a budget problem with using their service?
Apr 29 2016
I haven't logged into anything except my MacBook in months so I think
you're good to go!
Apr 28 2016
Sorry Chase -- I don't actually need this now since I don't manage the
analytics team anymore. Probably best to remove the access.
Mar 21 2016
I'm honestly not sure what this would accomplish now. The Reading team has abode by community wishes communicated by an RFC and have disabled the feature. All of the people who were responsible for Gather on a decision making level have been gone for more than a year.
Mar 17 2016
Thank you Ori
I would like to delay this patch (not deploy today) until the discussion has a chance to finish up. However, I can't actually do this. Can someone grab this task?
Feb 29 2016
To keep the archives happy:
Feb 26 2016
It turns out that per @Moushira, Village pumps also don't render well on mobile.
Feb 25 2016
Other pages with issues on mobile:
Feb 24 2016
Looks like MassMessage then?
ok -- we have the text of the message. Can someone please tell me how to
Feb 14 2016
See ask for docs/resources on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T123142
Hi all -- Nemo's asking for some documentation on this service. Any chance we can get this scheduled? Happy to help find the appropriate resources.
Jan 17 2016
Dec 31 2015
From my perspective, I want T114072 to happen because it helps with
presentation issues but I don't have the context to part of a discussion.
Real time editing seems more suited for the summit.
Dec 28 2015
Dec 15 2015
Dec 14 2015
Hi Quim -- we'll take a look next week. It's very connected to the work on the mobile presentation that we're doing right now.
Dec 7 2015
If people turn it on, then off, will we be able to count them?
Hi Adam -- we should review this "soon" as it potentially impacts users who are trying to increase page performance by not downloading images but have the additional undesirable effect of disabling the cache.
Dec 3 2015
T114542: Next Generation Content Loading and Routing, in Practice (+ T111588: RFC: API-driven web front-end, T106099: RFC: Page composition using service workers and server-side JS fall-back)
T114072: <section> tags for MediaWiki sections
T113210: How should Wikimedia software support non-Wikimedia deployments of its software?
T113540: What can the Search API do for you?
Nov 30 2015
I have experienced this bug multiple times over the last few weeks. It
causes the article to be unreadable on my iphone. From my perspective this
is a high priority issue.
Nov 24 2015
Nov 23 2015
I think we can find a balance between a power user's IDE view of editing
with lots of tools versus and relatively simple editing experience for
newbies/anons. I'd like to think of the two experiences as 80/20 rather
than 100% either way.
Nov 21 2015
Hi Moushira -- would love your feedback on this. Thanks!
I think so -- this is primarily is response to some discussions with
community folks who say that they actually will pull pages up in a mobile
to see how they render. It would be nice to have this be part of the tool.
Nov 20 2015
We're pulling this into this sprint; there are a few minor UX issues to explore but we'd like to get this done now.
Nov 16 2015
I agree with the SWAT deployment. Thanks for the quick response all.
Nov 2 2015
Argh -- wrong parent.
Argh -- I'd like to move forward with the suggestions Adam captured in the
previous comment. I'll create a sub-ticket for the IRC channel and for
communicating this out.
I'm disappointed that it took this long, but it is done.
Oct 29 2015
I wonder if we redacted the W0 numbers in 2.0. I seem to remember some
concerns about sharing those publicly.
Oct 23 2015
[continued] so I would support keeping the status quo for now.
Thanks Krenair - qchris has my complete trust and support for any access he
feels is appropriate.
Congrats Dan and team -- nice to see this so close.
Oct 22 2015
Anne's doing this as part of her work for the readership team and I approve.
Oct 20 2015
I agree with bd808 -- we need to decide what data we need to support our
use cases and record just that, subject to normal privacy/ethical concerns
of course. We should take this approach across the board.
I talked to Bob West -- there are some other options we can investigate for
populating the lists.
Oct 19 2015
We're going to post publicly -- ticket should not be closed until this
happens. Anne/Jon are point since they both worked on the analysis.
Thanks for the bump -- the task status (stalled) is definitely accurate.
Oct 16 2015
Oct 13 2015
Oct 8 2015
I support keeping things simple for this project and simply replacing the
source and definition of the page view logs as Dan proposes. Our
definitions will improve over time as will our ability to identify and
Oct 5 2015
I spoke with Kevin on this -- he'll follow up with you, but yes, this is a
high priority task. If we can't finish by the requested date, we (you) need
to say when it will be done. We do have workarounds in the short term.
Hi all -- Terry has asked that this be finished by the next scorecard (10/19). We need to let him know the schedule -- do we have an ETA?
Oct 3 2015
@JKatzWMF and I were talking about this today and I wanted to capture it. What if we acknowledged that there were actually two applications here -- an editor stack that needed to support 100,000 users and an consumption app that needed to support millions.
Thanks Erik -- that worked. I'll be taking the phab training next month :)
Oct 1 2015
Hi Erik -- I can't seem to bring up the image in the attached task. It says
the image isn't viewable.
Sep 28 2015
Nice work Baha! Let's run this by research as well, I'm sure there will be
feedback on seasonality, etc.
Sep 19 2015
Sep 18 2015
Sep 15 2015
Hi Quim -- I'd like to second @Spage's proposal that we form a working group around Gabriel's proposals. The audience teams have been working to create some product requirements to accompany these proposals and it would be very constructive to report on these discussions at the summit.
Sep 2 2015
Folks -- I'm going to respond to the wikitech thread; let's continue the discussion about the why's behind this project there. It's more accessible and it would be better to have a single discussion thread.