User Details
- User Since
- Aug 21 2020, 11:05 AM (27 w, 2 d)
- Availability
- Available
- IRC Nick
- Urbanecm
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Martin Urbanec (WMF) [ Global Accounts ]
Today
wrong task...
Yesterday
@Iniquity If you can just give me a reason (in Russian) that should appear in the notification for the reassigned mentees, I'd appreciate it. I usually use something like "your previous mentor is no longer available, so we assigned you a new one", but the choice is up to you.
Fri, Feb 26
I'll do it next week then.
Thu, Feb 25
@Trizek-WMF Since you are the one who prepares a set of configuration variables for me to use when deploying, can you have a look at this one, please?
@OTichonova @RHo Was tis done? :-)
Inddeed it was, thanks.
@Trizek-WMF I removed T275130 as the parent task, as it doesn't sound to be blocked by deploying to Romanian Wikipedia. Is there any other parent task it is supposed to have?
@Strainu So, you want the description to be kept for editing guide, but link to the MW manual in Romanian, and link the images link to Wikipedia:Imagini? Is that right?
Wed, Feb 24
Thanks @nettrom_WMF. Moving to code review then.
(clearing assignee as no one actually fixed this one)
@Trizek-WMF @Strainu Hi, I'm going to change links in the following way:
Certainly, will do later today.
Done, thanks Kosta.
Tue, Feb 23
@kostajh It seems you created those files. Can they be deleted?
We are heading towards making wiki config editor a fully featured special page that would be self-explanatory. Not worth the effort.
Agreed, this is much better :). Confirmed via calling new mw.Api().saveOption('growthexperiments-mentor-id', null).done( function() { window.location.reload() }); with homepage loaded that the mentor is stored permanently now.
Thank you for asking this question. I am implementing this feature as a class implementing the standard Config interface. That means it should not be extremely hard to move the implementation in the GrowthExperiments to MediaWIki core if something like this would be wanted by multiple parties.
No way to QA this, closing right away.
Mon, Feb 22
I just ran the command @Pchelolo suggested, and I'm indeed seeing the expected jobs there. However, the job is apparently not getting executed for quite a long time, judging by the following query:
Preliminary prioritising this as UBN, unless we figure out this is not as serious as it looks like.