Ok then let's wait ... no problem. Thanks

Yes deploy it immediately. Thanks

Ok I understand perfectly. Then we rely on you. You decide where to activate it exactly. No problem for us. Thanks

If it were possible we would like to introduce the VisualEditor in each of our individual namespaces regardless of its specific function. Is it possible that you know?

So basically you are telling me that it is not possible to solve this problem? Or better, that can not be solved without upsetting everything? Just to better understand the situation and what decisions will be taken. Thank you

In T200089#4530459, @Jdlrobson wrote:

@Vajotwo can you find out if the user is using a script to make this changes?

@Jdlrobson The user in question denies using scripts to make these changes. He says he does not know how to do it and simply makes a copy paste through the normal editor interface on Wikipedia to make massive changes.

Do you have more or less idea how long it will take to fix this bug? It's not an urgent matter of course, it's just to get an idea. Thank you

Exactly, you understood everything. Those contributions should not appear in the latest changes because I personally assigned the flood flag to that user a few days ago. I am a sysop of this Wikipedia. But they continue to appear as if nothing had happened.

If the vector version of the logo manifest problems you are authorized to use the PNG format instead. Just to clarify ...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikisource-logo-vec.png

In T132185#2191184, @Dereckson wrote:

Do you have a local project consensus to rewrite the motto in lowercase?

In T132185#2191059, @Dereckson wrote:

When do you want the logo to be restored?

In T132157#2191071, @Dereckson wrote:

If you provide a vectorial version of the logo, we can offer HD version too.