As Xabriel's manager, I approve.

thank you @Papaul.

Thanks for this @Dzahn. Platform Engineering are reaching out to DC-Ops to see what our options are.

General update on cross team:

Approved, thanks @jhathaway

@Jdforrester-WMF I recall this issue from, at least, more than a year ago. I don't think, but am willing to be wrong, that Platform Engineering owns completing this but who does own this right now? (Apologies if that is already evident and I just missed it, curious where it fits in priorities and if it should move up/down)

@Dzahn thanks so much for the help

@jhathaway done, thanks

thanks @hnowlan, @Isaac and @STran for jumping on this.

Thanks for catching this, I've asked @hnowlan to take a look.

@Tgr That is an entirely reasonable question - maybe that is a reason for Platform to remove itself for now from the maintainers list. I think logically this would live near the API Platform team. Having said that, I think, we would need to maybe consider putting it back in stewardship review because we aren't resourced to support it in the manner you describe fully. Having that aspect as a key criteria for stewardship would be great - that taking responsibility should come with appropriate resourcing.

Should this close as by Platform Engineering is responsible for this extension?

hi @kostajh, no, this task refers to the Image Suggestion API service, the T304891 refer to the Image Suggestion Dataset/Data Gateway Service so they are distinct.

@Wurgl Thanks, that's super helpful to know! To be transparent, RESTBase is in a deprecated state and it is going to be difficult for us to pick bugs that are not unbreak now level. I will do my best to keep this in the stack and slot it in.

@Physikerwelt What is the severity/urgency for this issue?

Just to be clear, on why I added this task to the Platform Engineering Icebox. We acknowledge the existence of this task but progress on it is unlikely. If anyone can walk through the urgency/priority that would be helpful.

As @tchin 's manager I approve.

@Snwachukwu Everything here can go. Thanks.

@brennen Amazing thank you so much

@brennen @thcipriani Would it be possible to get a sense of when this might complete? It's moving in the direction of a blocker for us. This is a good opportunity to ask what the process is for that. Should we raise priority? We don't have an urgency field we could use and raising the priority feels presumptuous of us(we know you know the task exists and we know you'll get to it when you can).

As Platform Engineering manager, I approve.

Approved.

On that basis it makes most sense to add me and Atieno(Atieno is a new EM on Platform she is setting up her phab/gerrit at the moment). Do you want me to submit a request for this @Dzahn?

@Dzahn Is it possible to add @MNadrofsky to the approver lists as well as he is the Platform Tech Director to cover Engineers? If the structure is that it should be team EMs rather than Directors we can add me and Atieno Njira for Platform.

@Pchelolo will support on this project from Platform Engineering for Q3. So at @RLazarus can start including Petr from now. Not sure how this will be tracked but from PET's perspective Petr would be matrixing these hours so it would be for you all to track, does that make sense or do you need program manager resources too?