User Details
- User Since
- Nov 2 2014, 4:13 PM (615 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
- IRC Nick
- xaosflux
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Xaosflux [ Global Accounts ]
Sun, Aug 16
Over a year on, still getting fatal ungraceful errors with large import requests, examples in: T395902
Still failing with ungraceful errors - this example was today to zhwikiversity:
Fri, Aug 14
Is this still an issue? I can't seem to reproduce a problem with shift-click or cntrl-cick
Tue, Aug 4
releasing if anyone else wants this - the RFC is pretty clear
Declining, as case sensitivity in the local-part "MUST BE" case sensitive per the SMTP specification.
RFC5321(Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) states "The local-part of a mailbox MUST BE treated as case sensitive."
RFC5321(Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) states "The local-part of a mailbox MUST BE treated as case sensitive."
Mon, Aug 3
OK, when created please link here then just close this as a WONT FIX.
Perhaps this can changed to a feature request - to include an indicator on the dashboard that a specific course must be managed upstream?
Sun, Aug 2
Hi, I don't know who it is. from the dashboard side is this just "expected behavior" and instructors should see the Event Center team?
Fri, Jul 31
Thu, Jul 30
Mon, Jul 27
Style guide available here: https://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/your-role-in-article-production/ieee-editorial-style-manual
Thu, Jul 23
I suspect we don't need to protect this as a security issue anymore?
To the requester: if commonswiki wants this, they could unblock this range on their project (and optionally replace it with multiple smaller ranges)
Jul 20 2026
Jul 10 2026
Agree, this is solved. A community discussion and a group request can be used as needed.
Jun 28 2026
Having a confirmation without deactivating the button isn't going to fix the underlying issue - this form gets repeatedly submitted by users who just keep clicking the submit button.
Ideally, after submitting, this button would become deactivated, along with providing some confirmation that the submission occurred:
Jun 20 2026
Jun 19 2026
I tired to remove this from that example wikidata entry above, it failed. Is there a different phab case for claim removal interactions with the SBL?
Jun 7 2026
Jun 4 2026
This seems to be blocked on T121098 ; a project (in this case commonswiki) can't whitelist a subset of a globalblock - doing so would be the fix
May 27 2026
The RFC said that existing processes should NOT be broken - they should be updated.
May 26 2026
May 20 2026
FYI: Just tried and PASSED against the original user story in production.
This issue is still occurring in production
[b247c032-6181-4a96-851f-5fb39a961c8f] 2026-05-20 12:02:25: Fatal exception of type "Wikimedia\Assert\PreconditionException"
Not limited to webui, api same fail:
May 18 2026
Thank you, I've sent a few emails, and some emailauth users have reported back that they are now getting their codes.
Another yahoo user reporting emailauth problems in https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom;TicketID=17933594
May 16 2026
Anyone from the SMTP team looked at this yet? Anecdotally some outbound yahoo mail seems to be working now, but not sure if anything we can do about this is actually resolved?
May 14 2026
Verify - this isn't preventing message on CREATE, just autocreate?
May 13 2026
Confirmed solved in production
Yahoo SMTP sender admin guide: https://senders.yahooinc.com/best-practices/
May 12 2026
Similar to T243937 , closing as no longer able to reproduce. If there is still a current issue, please reopen with details.
I'm going to mark this closed as there are no recent issues, I've personally tested multiple email workflows successful to this domain. Reopen if there are more details that can be worked on.
Ticket suggests this is also preventing things like registration, emailauth, password recovery.
May 5 2026
Note: If I get elevated using a different workflow, then the change content model interface does work during my non-expired time.
Reported in WMF-Stewards meeting today.
May 4 2026
For example, using just parameters I was never able to reproduce the user story from this ticket on desktop.
Yes, it seems that even using all the parameters I've found (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOAPBOX?useparsoid=1&useskin=minerva&mobileaction=toggle_view_mobile ) doesn't reliably cause the server to return the same response.
Thanks, so only by "tricking" it client-side.
Aside: is there a reliable method to access the 'mobile' layout on desktop anymore?
May 2 2026
Such a mechanism needs to be able to prevent "local project overrides" (at least optionally). Global banned accounts, deceased users, compromised accounts, etc. should never be logging in.
Apr 30 2026
Zunny closed their bug ( https://github.com/znuny/Znuny/issues/779 ) - can we get our side scheduled?
Apr 19 2026
Consumer is still approved: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/5709c54e5e241577730e27c13e1a56cf
Apr 18 2026
Apr 16 2026
Seems like this may make https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_reminder_bot no longer needed
Apr 15 2026
Zunny claims to have fixed upstream in v6.5.20
Apr 13 2026
See also T230968
It should also explicitly say that you will be publishing a new page/revision if this workflow is being used to author a new page.
OK thanks, that can be a different UI issue.
OK, forget my comment above -- however this has resulted in a NEW problem - using Special:ChangeContentModel to "create" pages needs work - nothing about it's UI suggests using it will CREATE a page.
The user communication on this seems a bit off, "...all autoconfirmed users can now use Special:ChangeContentModel page to create new pages with custom content models..." ; that Special Page isn't used to "create" pages at all.
Apr 7 2026
I reported there, though that is on a different release (not our LTS train) - but it could be shared code
Apr 5 2026
Can someone check the log.. think it is in /opt/znuny/var/log/otrs.log ?
Apr 3 2026
Possibly related to T421671 ?
FATAL ERROR:
This just started happening today, I think there was a software release yesterday
Mar 27 2026
Note we also semi-regularly get (and process) requests to "un-vanish" accounts just because a project wants the account to have the old name for their records (typically related to disruptive users) so the "system user" is also a bit of a problem there.
Mar 23 2026
I'm not sure what changed, but there is certainly a change around this date, the code referenced above may not be the cause, I don't know what the cause is.
I think this break the rarely used manual account un-vanish process, not to mention simply being inaccurate.
Yes, I'd think the errors should be cleaned up, is a sub-ticket needed?
I'm not sure what the cause of the behavior change is, but this is recent, only seems to be presenting in the last month.
Mar 22 2026
Mar 21 2026
Mar 20 2026
I'm going to close this as no longer able to reproduce, please re-open if you can reproduce the issue.
Mar 18 2026
@Nux for your use case (wanting to copy current code) try ?action=raw
Perhaps that log summary should link to a documentation page?

