In T233561#5570753, @MBH wrote:

@DannyS712 @Tgr @Zache I wrote a bot that reviews all edit sequences that was not reviewed due to this bug. I wrote it for ruwiki, but if you want, I can launch it for your wikis too, if your wikis grant "editor" flag to my bot.

Would it help for debugging if we could replicate this in test2.wikipedia.org?

AFAIK all Flaproblems what i have seen can be explained with settings from wmf-config/flaggedrevs.php is not loaded.

In T233561#5537057, @Tgr wrote:

I see all the groups I should be seeing (["checkuser", "sysop", "*", "user", "autoconfirmed"]).
The error message says The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Editors, Reviewers.
What it should say (and does if I load the page in incognito mode) is Administrators, Editors. So this does seem like an issue with site configuration being messed up occasionally.

I tried to check yesterday if the patrolling is working or not too, but there are not many wikis where the patrolling and flagged revs are both wgUseRCPatrol and FlaggedRews are both enabled. Also when revision is manually reviewed then it will be patrolled too which will mask the problem.

In T233561#5537071, @Neolexx wrote:

To the best of my knowledge en-wiki doesn't use FlaggedRevs extension (as a replacement for the native patrol mechanics). Compare

I made a small script for myself to see if the UI (javascript) code thinks that I am autoreviewed or not. Script colorifies the usarname on the top of the page and prints a list of the groups on the end of the page.

@Reedy do you have any educated guess what is going on here?

Confirmed in fiwiki too (user Aulis Eskola is in 'editor' user group which have autoreview user right and his edit should have been automatically reviewed)

• https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toiminnot:Loki?type=review&user=&page=Painokytkin&wpdate=&tagfilter=&uselang=en

Based on huwiki configuration I think special:unreviewedpages is allowed only for Administrators and Editors. Ie. users with autoreview right should see a permission denied error on Special:UnreviewedPages.

pushing this little bit up. It would be nice to get goodfaith working.

In T209224#5496088, @Halfak wrote:

... We should instead look at the number of edits that need to be reviewed in order to catch most of the vandalism. Without something like ORES in place, this is really just a factor of the total number of edits. ...

I would amend the patch and edit the task description to include removing the redundant nys.

@Reedy I think that we are happy that you are maintaining it and thank you for fixing the configuration.

Hmm, problem may be just because 'ukwiki' => false is missing from wgFlaggedRevsOverride setting in InitialiseSettings.php ?

seems to work, thanks

https have error NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID

• https://wikipedia.fi/

Yes, we removed the local bot flag from Xqbot and its edits are not automatically reviewed.

• https://fi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pan-American_Highway&action=history

@Samat Is there any comments from community to the results?

for sju, sjd, and rmf this will be already done in T226701.

In T226701#5304443, @Urbanecm wrote:

@Yupik Are the two changes dependent on each other in some way?

Reported again in fiwiki by three users. One commented also that mobile site was working better.

In T222309#5265020, @Cparle wrote:

Live on commons now. Ok to close the ticket @Yupik @Zache @Keegan ?

now sms is added to beta commons config it works in captions in file info page. However it still doesn't work in upload wizard (missing in both: caption and description language selector)

Also https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Revision_table is outdated

@Aklapper Ok one blocker removed

(@Aklapper) if this is something which needs to be asked from WMF then from who or where it needs to be asked?

@Zoranzoki21 Do NOT enable VisualEditor on those wikis. Enable on only in fi.wikibooks.org

Hmm, code should be live in Commons. sms is still missing from user interface because language is not configured to commons.

AFAIK. SDC captions are same thing than Wikibase labels. It would be good thing if supported languages for monolingual texts and terms would be same. Terms = captions, labels, descriptions, aliases.

Also related to that is there some reason why moratoira cannot be removed as RFC by @Dereckson was closed without resolution and biggest voiced reason for it in first place was that nobody actually did enabling?

So if we do not want to use wmgExtraLanguageNames for SDC (per T222309#5156677) then it needs to be fixed in code too?

Let's check if I have understood the system correctly @Nikerabbit

In T222309#5210269, @Cparle wrote:

Is that what we want?

sms needs to be configured to the backend also as supported language. For quick testing defining via wmgExtraLanguageNames or wgExtraLanguageNames is fastest.

I updated the flagged revs reviews stats graphs and fiwiki as reference.

btw, there is already wbTermsLanguages variable in mw.config.get() variables initialized in WikibaseMediaInfoHooks.php which contains languages supported by the backend. Not sure though if it is gonna be deprecated as it seems not to be in use anymore.

I would like to understand what i am actually looking here: (ie in one year huwiki's "active anonymous editors" editing level raised to same level than in fiwiki. Before that they were editing with accounts and now they are making edits without logging in?

Testing request for somebody. What Structured data on Commons does if wgExtraLanguageNames is set.

Notes related to structured data on commons labels/descriptions

Adding language to labels

• wmgExtraLanguageNames = labels, descriptions
• Example: T220118

i defined that would be out of scope for this hackathon because it is unlikely that we can do anything for it here in this timeframe.

Hmm, it definitely changed variation of damaging model values to better. No opinion yet for real life the difference.

Question number 1 is why southern sami does work in all places, but inari sami does not?

@Mahveotm why this is blocked? Or more precisely if it is because my comment then year is now full and it can be reverted.

It seems that "With the election results validated by the constitutional court, MPs are to be formally sworn in on 15 May". Source: BBC, 2019-05-09, How Benin's democratic crown has slipped

Confirmed in fiwikis village pump too and example edit.

I believe it was @Amire80 who suggested that we should instead be using language-data (which is also used by ULS) for all these cases. I don't know how one would go about doing that though.

Heikki Kastemaa, Kulttuurinavigaattori, was a resident at The Finno-African culture center Villa Karo in Grand-Popo, Benin from December 4 2017 to January 20 2018 presenting and promoting Wikipedia. After that Heikki has followed Wikipedia usage related Africa to that and made presentations about it so this would be support material for that. Most likely we would also write a blog post related Benin elections with larger open society focus than just Wikipedia shutdown. (ie. the inability of opposition parties to participate to elections, new social media taxation, mobile internet usage, etc)

In T54971#3718220, @Tpt wrote:

A hacky way to do it is maybe to create fake "sites" per languages. We would for example have amiincubatorwiki would be a fake site that could be used for sitelink that have exactly the same configuration as the one of incubatorwiki

In T165585#4773411, @Amire80 wrote:

Soon, when we start the technical architecture work. (I'm not totally sure who "we" are, I'm working on it.)

T166909 Complete edit quality campaign v2 in Finnish Wikipedia is completed.

There is three basic setups. First two are traditional show latest / stable version by default which means that if revision needs to be reviewed before it is show to anonymous reader by default. This default setting is for whole namespace. Reader can always choose to read latest revision and administrators can toggle between latest / stable case by case. If latest version is shown as default then Flagged revs is mainly used as review manager AND for protecting pages.

Fiwiki has FR enabled and it's Flagged revs test pages can be used as for testing. If testing is limited to those those pages I think that it can be done without bot flag and you can ask Flagged Revs permissions for reviewing/unreviewing pages from me (Zache) or if you need stabilization permissions then you can ask those from byrocrat @Ejs-80 . Just reading of review status of the page doesn't need any special permission.

Just linking related ticket T218278 . There are in comments links to stabilizerbot which is bot implementation for this and to Cirdans kokolores repo for the same idea.

@LGoto Why this was closed as invalid? Afaik this bug still exists.

Some communities [citation needed] already do something like this.

Is there example page for Lua/wikicode somewhere?

@Mahveotm In a technical sense, you should just to revert this change.

My suggestion is that because it is almost April the testing period would be a full year (365 days) if it is not a problem for huwiki community and then revert the change. This would make the results of the test more useful to others. This, of course, requires support from huwiki community.

add flaggedrevision extension to wikidata.org? I don't it is suitable for wikidata.org, but i don't think that is what @Tgr asked in the ticket.

If I remember correctly the ar_comment was visible in labsdb before moving to separate comment table.