In T368610#10039344, @jrbs wrote:

In T368610#10037447, @Zheng_Zhou wrote:

B'crat @Wong128hk also stated that WMF’s security team is already investigating activities that may have obstructed procedural fairness of this RFDA.

I think you mean the Trust and Safety team, as far as I know the Security team is not looking at this.

In T368610#10037542, @SCP-2000 wrote:

@Ericliu1912 @Zheng_Zhou Please discuss this matter on zhwiki instead of here. This isn't the place to discuss policy. Thanks.

In T368610#10037450, @Ericliu1912 wrote:

Under current rules, local bureaucrats has the final say on whether the poll should be extended. It is always possible to deal with other problems (including the legitamacy of the extended poll itself) after the whole procedure had concluded, so there's no reason not to go forward with it.

The zh.wiki community never reached a consensus w.r.t. extending the poll. Local policy did not stipulate the procedures related to extension, either. Local policy did require Stewards as scrutineers, and we would like to request Stewards involvement as the B'crats are trying to extend the poll without disclosing result of the current poll. B'crat @Wong128hk also stated that WMF’s security team is already investigating activities that may have obstructed procedural fairness of this RFDA. Under the circumstances, shouldn’t the zh.wiki community hold and wait for result of security team’s investigation? I don’t see how extending the poll for 1 week can correct any potential issues with procedural fairness.