User Details
- User Since
- Sep 17 2014, 6:19 PM (158 w, 21 h)
- Roles
- Administrator
- Availability
- Available
- IRC Nick
- andre__
- LDAP User
- Aklapper
- MediaWiki User
- AKlapper (WMF)
Today
Assuming this is about administrators (as users can reset their password themselves), the admin password is shared between admins.
Who of the listed admins are you? Why cannot the other admin provide the admin password to you?
Yesterday
Hmm. I cannot find that string in /SemanticDrilldown/i18n/de.json so I'm wondering where it comes from. Could you open that page by appending ?uselang=qqx as a URL parameter (or &uselang=qqx if your URL already includes a ?), so you could get the raw names of those two strings?
"Edit Column" is still avaliable in this very (Wikimedia) instance of Phabricator, hence closing this task as invalid as I cannot reproduce the problem.
Not sure yet https://github.com/grimoirelab/sortinghat/issues/90 is fully resolved, as owlbot overwrote my changes again - I reported that in https://gitlab.com/Bitergia/c/Wikimedia/support/issues/1#note_41625778
/me forces himself to not repeat things...
Assuming this is about Wikispeech, hence adding project so the task is shown on a workboard
[offtopic]
(@Aklapper might know who?)
I expect another Community Wishlist Survey where anyone can propose wishes. And there are the usual communication channels. I don't think I'm telling news. :)
Nothing resolved here, hence setting declined status
See T100987
When I try to use guc on a user
For future reference (this task is already handled in T176831), please provide a link to "guc" - see https://mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_report_a_bug
Thanks.
Tue, Sep 26
In theory done:
To https://github.com/Bitergia/mediawiki-identities.git f44cdb9..50e1ccc master -> master
In practice let's see after the next owlbot activity.
Hi and welcome @Miriam! If I interpret https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Office_IT correctly you'll have to contact WMF's techsupport as Office-IT does not primarily use Phabricator to track their work and as the project description here talks about "tracking internal Office IT projects" (which welcomes clarification, I admit).
No steps to reproduce a problem were given, hence I'm closing this task as invalid for the time being.
Please see https://mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_report_a_bug for future reference. Thanks for your understanding.
@Anooprao: Can you please provide a specific example of an article, the exact reference text that you wanted to change, and to what exactly you tried to change it? If there is a sofware bug here then it needs absolutely clear steps to reproduce that allow someone else to follow the very same steps. Thanks!
@Dereckson, @Ladsgroup, @Lucie, @Nurieta, @01tonythomas :
There is nothing urgent here; I'm just seeking for (public) thoughts and input on this. If you have any, feel free to add a comment here. Thanks in advance :)
This tech talk has 4,500 views, however it is sadly out of date.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fpkHyCGX1Y
We need somebody to do a new talk! I (rfarrand) can help arrange the logistics and announce it.
This won't fit into my travelling schedule for quite a longer time, and we have approaches like 'Featured Projects' that require our concentration.
So I'm going to decline this for the time being, though I still like the idea.
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!
Assuming this is about WMDE-Fundraising-Tech (feel free to correct)
Alright, I updated https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wm_technical_areas.svg
we have tried rectifying many times but it doesn't seems to be working
Please describe specifically what you have tried, and why it "did not work".
Basically see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_errors:_dates
If I go to https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/(DivX)_ಡಿವ್ಎಕ್ಸ್ , I see the problems listed under ಆಕರಗಳು.
Is something listed that should not be listed? If so, please provide a specific example.
Assuming this is about Edit-Review-Improvements-Integrated-Filters
@Kudpung: There are no news, otherwise they could be found here.
The patch linked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92621#1308458 needs a manual rebase; that seems to be the next step anyone could perform.
Mon, Sep 25
Thanks for reporting this.
- test uses mw-collapsible-toggle: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Collapsible_elements#Simple
- test2 uses mw-customtoggle: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Collapsible_elements#With_custom_toggle_link
[Please add corresponding projects to tasks, otherwise tasks will never appear on their workboards. Adding Mail + Operations as that's also the tags on T159750 ]
Uh, I see - I'm sorry! [Please adjust associated projects in such cases, otherwise folks will not see this task on the their workboard.]
{{done}}
So... I believe that understanding and defining which pages should be Tutorials vs How-Tos vs References is the key.
I urge anybody to read https://www.divio.com/en/blog/documentation/ (pretty much the talk I attended at Write The Docs conference).
Thanks!!
What would "better error handling" be?
@Pablo-WMDE: Please make sure that either the status of tasks is changed to "resolved" once these tasks are done, or that open tasks have active projects (like WMDE-Fundraising-Tech) associated so they can be found on workboards. Could you please update this task accordingly? Thanks!
Sun, Sep 24
No, as for sidebar items it feels more usual to link to some anchors. I would not expect that from a top-level logo link... :)
If you refer to a comment on Gerrit you likely want to reply on Gerrit. So everybody involved can actually see the context. :)
I do not consider this a bug as the name of an anchor on a page is not the same as the name of a page?
Item is now called Changesets Statistics (Open Time in Days) hence closing this task. Thanks!
Hi @Uchup19, thanks for taking the time to report this!
Unfortunately this report lacks some information. If you have time and can still reproduce the problem: Please add a more complete description to this report (a list of steps to reproduce which leave no room for interpretation what to do, describing actual results and expected results after performing the steps to reproduce, attaching or linking to a public testcase, browser information, MediaWiki version information, etc). You can edit the task description by clicking .
Ideally, exact and clear steps to reproduce should allow any other person to follow these steps (without having to interpret those steps) and see the same results. Problems that others can reliably reproduce can get fixed faster. Thanks!
Nothing fixed, hence nothing resolved :)
Sat, Sep 23
I do not think that the AjaxQuickDelete gadget maintainers use Phabricator to track AjaxQuickDelete related tasks (but I am happy to be proven wrong) so I'm afraid this issue is out of scope for Phabricator as we don't track issues of random gadgets here.
Have you considered reporting this on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-QuickDelete.js ?
Requested public project WDQS-Optimizer has been created: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/view/3027/
@Framawiki: ping?
I'd say so. I currently rather see us commit to featured projects (and their tasks) offering mentors than specific tasks offering mentors.
My question is: in which file of luasandbox distribution can I inject a reference to an additional library for the C linker? Or is there an altogether neater way to fo it?
This sounds like a support question and not like a bug report or feature request which Phabricator is meant for?
Or is this a request to enhance the documentation (if yes, where exactly would you expect this to be documented)?
Argh, page setup... Let's try again (works as expected in rsvg-view-3):
@Rammanojpotla: I don't understand... Where were "typos" mentioned before? Please elaborate and see T38594#3617527 - thanks!
I don't see anything specific requested to be done in Phabricator code (yet), hence proposing to remove the Phabricator tag.
Potentially MediaWiki-extension-requests ?
Is this the same as T13524: Add a system messages for categories?
I go to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Clovis,_California?debug=true in Firefox 55 on Linux and I do not see any such error pop-up displayed. :(
Fri, Sep 22
Same applies for "Services" (not many projects/tasks to point to). Or QA/CI. Or MediaWiki core...