User Details
- User Since
- Aug 19 2019, 10:42 PM (244 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
- IRC Nick
- apaskulin
- LDAP User
- Alex Paskulin
- MediaWiki User
- APaskulin (WMF) [ Global Accounts ]
Today
Hi @Salima_Rabiu, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I appreciate the detail you put in to the approach and solution sections. I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.
Hi @QuillPusher24, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I appreciate the sections about scope and challenges in your proposal. And thank you for your contributions to the docs! I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.
Fri, Apr 19
Hi @Areeshatariq, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I really like the detail you put into your proposal, especially in the timeline. I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.
This is now complete. We've gone through all the fields and agreed on conventions for each type of field and specific parameter and property. We'll continue to adjust this as we complete the spec updates and the information architecture for the site before we publish it as part of the process to add an API to the docs site.
Oops, my mistake, I forgot we don't resolve tasks immediately in this sprint process. Moving to sign off, but feel free to change if that's not the right column.
Thanks for the reviews! This is great feedback. I've updated the task to reflect the consensus from reviews here and in Slack. I've added a link to both these decision records on https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/AQS_2.0#Decision_records
Thu, Apr 18
Question: I am trying to compare this https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Interwiki_linking and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Links#Interwiki_links . How do we know which information is missing since the content on both pages is not the same?
Hi @Tabah-B, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! Can you include the number of hours per week that you would be available to work on the project?
Hi @Mhmohona, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I really like the detail you put into your proposal, especially in the schedule. I also appreciate that you added a stretch goal to develop a maintenance process. I'm going to move your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal.
I'm moving your proposal into the Reviewed column. We'll let you know on May 10 if we've selected your proposal. Thanks!
Just wanted to +1 this task and say that I encounter this issue a lot
I think “REST API module” is ok, contrasting with “Action API module” and “ResourceLoader module”. I also like “API group” or “API endpoint group”. It’s boring (in a good way), and I think it introduces the least amount of ambiguity.
Tue, Apr 16
Thanks for opening this, @Tacsipacsi! I think this is a good idea and would simply the theme code that allows some specific keyword literals.
Version 1.0.0 has now been released! A big thanks to everyone who contributed to this! Further improvements will be tracked outside this task.
Fixed in v1.0.0 by enabling the betterlinks plugin, with the exception of the link on https://doc.wikimedia.org/mediawiki-core/master/js/module-mediawiki.storage.html which is tracked by T362427: Phabricator links processed twice
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0
Released as part of v1.0.0 and documented on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/JSDoc#Plugins
Released as part of v1.0.0
Mon, Apr 15
Hi @user_123, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you would be available to work on the project? Thanks!
Hi @NidhiParab, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you would be available to work on the project? Thanks!
Hi @Agatevureglory, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project? Thanks!
Hi @Ibom99, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project? Thanks!
Hi @Network-charles, Can you update your statement of interest to include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project? Thanks!
Hi @Sahil-tgs, Thanks for your interest in Season of Docs! I really like the emphasis on usability and communication. Before I move your proposal into the reviewed column, can you include the number of hours per week that you're available to work on the project?