@Majavah We had new discussions and reached consensus. see https://w.wiki/3snm

after the new discussion end . we will re-open

In T287322#7245603, @Majavah wrote:

Phabricator is not the place to assess consensus. Please do that on-wiki and either re-open or decline this task using Add Action... → Change Status. Thanks.

In T287322#7245582, @Sanmosa wrote:

In T287322#7245481, @chungchungfei wrote:

In T287322#7245473, @Sanmosa wrote:

The consensus is NOT obvious at all, and I even see some comments which are strong opposes. Some users ignored those comments while handling the proposal. Please DO NOT add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki until a clear consensus is formed.

Are you sure? who are strong oppose? since the new discussion is open I agree hold on until a clear consensus is formed.

At least Bookwith and Yining Chen. I hope a clearer local policy could exist under a clear consensus.

In T287322#7245473, @Sanmosa wrote:

The consensus is NOT obvious at all, and I even see some comments which are strong opposes. Some users ignored those comments while handling the proposal. Please DO NOT add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection on zhwiki until a clear consensus is formed.

In T287322#7245363, @Jonathan5566 wrote:

On hold, policy has been rollback by DreamerBlue.

In T287322#7235901, @Sunny00217 wrote:

In T287322#7235173, @chungchungfei wrote:

In T287322#7235172, @Sunny00217 wrote:

I don't think this discussion has clear consensus for add extendedconfirmed user right and extended confirmed protection.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.

May be I have too much doubt.

Discussions have been going on for more than a month. When the last revised version was published, there was no objection at all, and the consensus was obvious.