@Andriy.v, second ping to my reply above.

More than a week seems to be passed, I'll go ahead and make the code.

This wiki does not use FlaggedRevs, so we would have to use the autopatrol version of autoreview. It would probably be autopatrolled and patroller.

I've read your reply, but do you have any link to the discussion?

There is an alternative option, wgRestrictUserPageEditing. However, this would require a user group to have the editalluserpages user right (either user or autoconfirmed).

I decided to mark this as on hold here (not the discussion) for an additional week as it just received another vote.

I proposed it a little more than a week ago and while there is only one vote in favor, I did not see any objection to my proposal.

I posted this discussion to the village pump, proposing to no longer allow bureaucrats to remove (and not grant) importer rights. A week and a day has passed without anyone commenting, so there is no objection either. Please implement those changes as I suggested in the initial task, thank you.

I don't think this is completed yet.

I was busy during that time as said above.

The non-existent right was removed. Done.

Done!

As of now, only admins and bots can equip tags on any edit or logged action. Thank you.

@WAN233 do you want those namespaces to be searchable? I'll cover this task.

There are two patches which conflict with each other:

1. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/mediawiki-config/+/1013975
2. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/mediawiki-config/+/992763

A solution is that I would create a brand new patch that does both of these commits, in one patch.

In T426882#11942055, @neriah wrote:

@codenamenoreste, you should wait at least a week after opening the discussion. Also, if you can ping other editors who may comment in support of or against the proposal, that would be helpful.

In T426882#11941997, @VadymTS1 wrote:

@codenamenoreste I can create patch, but the discussion link is bad and not open, give pls a new link

I fixed the link.

Since the global change might take longer to implement, I will do this.

Well, see T426206.

As of now, MediaWiki's page patrolling function on German Wikipedia is now fully disabled. Done.

I'll cover this task, but do you want both autopatrol and patrol removed from the user groups in German Wikipedia?

In T421796#11892100, @Ladsgroup wrote:

Theoretically we could but what's the reason? The full closure of all wikinews wikis will be done in a day or two and then the whole thing can be removed.

Can .* <noedit> be removed from the title blacklist on projects that are now fully read-only (only editable by stewards)? Thank you.

@Davidzdh, I created the patch days ago, feel free to review and notify me of any necessary changes. :-)

I will cover this task, but do you only want the Report: namespace to be searchable?

As of now, only (auto)confirmed users and admins can use ContentTranslation. Thank you.

^ Per above.

Is there a community discussion about this? If so, I'll proceed with the task.

TheresNoTime (a deployer) told me on IRC that the patch might be delayed for now until possibly later today or probably tomorrow.

Another solution would be to allow administrators to grant and remove the confirmed user group, yes?

All done. editor has now been removed, and the same happened for interface-editor (since the latter was probably added by mistake).

The block action for the abuse filter has been activated, with the preset being three days for both registered and unregistered users.

suppressredirect was added to the user groups as of right now, so done.

In T419312#11723244, @BraunOBruno wrote:

@codenamenoreste this doesn’t appear to have been deployed at the set date (March 13); option still unavailable.

In T419312#11706556, @gerritbot wrote:

Change #1251318 had a related patch set uploaded (by Gerrit Patch Uploader; author: Codename Noreste):

[operations/mediawiki-config@master] ptwiki: Enable block action for the abuse filter

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1251318

In T419105#11678299, @codenamenoreste wrote:

I'll start with the task when Bennylin confirms this here, unless anyone objects or says that a community discussion is required.

I'll start with the task when Bennylin confirms this here, unless anyone objects or says that a community discussion is required.

@Unite_together Is there a community discussion about the removal of these user groups?

In T419105#11677381, @MGChecker wrote:

I think the interface editor group is part of the global standard set and unlikely to be removed.

interface-editor only contains one right, extendedconfirmed.

In T417368#11614721, @Nirmos wrote:

Can confirm. This happens if you can't edit that filter.

In T413542#11612731, @suffusion_of_yellow wrote:

This is also completely broken on my phone. . The Ace editor is about one pixel wide. (Android, Firefox 149)