*hot dog* :-P

Hi @BBlack - can you add your concerns to this ticket....we're needing to get this figured out soon. Thanks!

In T191114#4109926, @Multichill wrote:

In T191114#4109676, @debt wrote:

Hi @Multichill - this is a very interesting idea, but it goes against all of our privacy concerns with the Wikipedia community and the movement in general. I believe that this idea has come up several times over the years, but because of privacy concerns, nothing has been done with it (marking as declined).

That's just FUD. Can you provide links where this has been discussed before? Can you explain exactly what the privacy concerns are? I'm not buying a declined without a decent conversation about this.

Moving this to 'later' as we won't have time to work on this anytime soon, and, as this has been around since 2007, it looks like not many folks are that interested in it.

Hi @Multichill - this is a very interesting idea, but it goes against all of our privacy concerns with the Wikipedia community and the movement in general. I believe that this idea has come up several times over the years, but because of privacy concerns, nothing has been done with it (marking as declined).

Cool suggestion, but we won't have time for this type of effort (in the Search team) for quite a while. :(

@CKoerner_WMF and @TJones can help with new wording for this :)

In T156474#4101045, @Izno wrote:

In T156474#4006373, @dcausse wrote:

Yes, but since this keyword will fail before all wikis are reindexed I think we should postpone any doc addition until the reindex is done. A task for adding it to the doc is good idea.

@debt Since you closed the subtask, Help:CirrusSearch does not document it yet. :)

Nice!

I've added the message to Discovery, wikitech-ambassadors, and maps-l on March 29, 2018. This was based off the posting here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Turn_on_mapframe?_We%E2%80%99re_ready_if_you_are

Keeping this ticket here for future tests - all good practices - even if we don't end up running this exact test.

@Jdrewniak - can you take a look?

Thanks for all the info and Q&A! :)

Woohoo - glad to see this progressing (even if I'm late to the party to see it!) :)

Once we re-index, this will be in production (with documentation)

We chatted more about this today - this isn't the mostest perfect way to handle this issue, but it's been running for nearly 2 months now and seems to be good enough for enwiki. Thanks for everyone's help and comments on this.

Great stuff, this will help WMDE with their Advanced Search implementation!

woohoo!

Yay!

Looks nice!

This was also asked here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:U86odd2qnp5d78dp

Hi @jmatazzoni - this is a bit difficult issue. Each wiki is slightly different in their maplink templates, so a 'one size fits all' template for adding a maplink just doesn't exist. It'd be totally cool if it did, but...yeah. :(

This work is being tracked in T172165

This is ongoing: more here T185012
Survey ends February 20th

Thanks to all that have given feedback on this ticket - it's greatly appreciated!

👍

👍

In T175102#3927802, @dr0ptp4kt wrote:

@Pigsonthewing thanks for the ping - deferring to @CKoerner_WMF and @JKatzWMF - I think an update is pending.

Hey @mpopov -- just wanted to let you know that Latvian and Arabic wikis now have mapframe too: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Maps&diff=2695678&oldid=2595033

Howdy all!

Howdy all!

Thanks for the add, @RobH, and I understand. :)

Here's one that I've noticed:

This test is ending when it rides the train and deploys to hewiki today. Please let @EBernhardson know if you have any questions or concerns about the data quality!

In T184944#3902602, @TJones wrote:

• It seems like this mechanism also needs to know how to interact with the general constraint of not surveying too often. Say—using arbitrary numbers for the example—that survey A can be re-asked in 3 weeks, but in general we decide we won't expose someone to any other survey for two weeks after they answer a given survey. So, a user takes survey A in week 0, and so theoretically can be re-asked in week 3. However, they take survey B in week 2, and so shouldn't shown any survey until week 4. Survey A has to know about it's own timeline (week 3 is okay to repeat A) and the general survey timeline (but no survey should be shown until week 4). I think this is covered by checking a "next available date" for the specific survey and a general "next available date" for all surveys.